Airports with new (computer tomography (CT)) scanners?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 861
Airports with new (computer tomography (CT)) scanners?
Whilst having the new scanners at LHR will (hopefully) speed up security checks the big bonus for me is the scrapping of the 100ml liquid rule when travelling with just hand luggage. However, if returning through an airport that still has the old scanners then the liquid rule change will not be of much help.
Is there a database/resource listing which airports have the new scanners (and where the 100ml liquid rule no longer applies)? If not, perhaps one of the administrators could create a thread where forum members can ask the question for specific airports?
Is there a database/resource listing which airports have the new scanners (and where the 100ml liquid rule no longer applies)? If not, perhaps one of the administrators could create a thread where forum members can ask the question for specific airports?
#2
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,854
I think it's one of those areas where it will look radically different in under a year so any global database is going to be wrong very quickly. CT scanners are appearing in all sorts of unlikely places like Belgrade, Southend and Shannon, airports in the USA are rushing them through too. Moreover CT scanners and liquid rules are actually separate outside the UK, so some places may introduce CT scanners and still have some restrictions on liquid containers. Realistically we have to work on the existing rules for about another 12 months or so, then things should be quite different.
Incidentally, we all need to hum "Love Me Do" by The Beatles when we use a CT scanner: this song broke The Beatles in the USA and led to EMI having so much cash they didn't know what to do with it, other than face a huge tax bill. They funded projects in all sorts of areas quickly, before the end of the tax year, one such project led to EMI investing in an engineer's hunch as to how CT could be used for scanning objects.
Incidentally, we all need to hum "Love Me Do" by The Beatles when we use a CT scanner: this song broke The Beatles in the USA and led to EMI having so much cash they didn't know what to do with it, other than face a huge tax bill. They funded projects in all sorts of areas quickly, before the end of the tax year, one such project led to EMI investing in an engineer's hunch as to how CT could be used for scanning objects.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 861
I think it's one of those areas where it will look radically different in under a year so any global database is going to be wrong very quickly. CT scanners are appearing in all sorts of unlikely places like Belgrade, Southend and Shannon, airports in the USA are rushing them through too. Moreover CT scanners and liquid rules are actually separate outside the UK, so some places may introduce CT scanners and still have some restrictions on liquid containers. Realistically we have to work on the existing rules for about another 12 months or so, then things should be quite different.
.
.
#5
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TPA/ABZ
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold. GGL/CCR.
Posts: 13,252
#6
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC, Eurostar
Posts: 3,294
Incidentally, we all need to hum "Love Me Do" by The Beatles when we use a CT scanner: this song broke The Beatles in the USA and led to EMI having so much cash they didn't know what to do with it, other than face a huge tax bill. They funded projects in all sorts of areas quickly, before the end of the tax year, one such project led to EMI investing in an engineer's hunch as to how CT could be used for scanning objects.
The first result on Google seems to point to the same conclusion, that although Godfrey Hounsfield and his team were EMI employees (and that cost shouldn't be ignored), EMI contributed less than 15% of the research grant, and the DHSS was the main funding power, ergo British taxpayers. Now, the Beatles would have been significant contributors to that taxpaying effort (thanks to the Rt. Hon members Wilson and Heath, cf the start of Revolver ) so maybe you're right after all!