Air travelers to U.S. set to face tougher COVID-19 testing
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD, LHR, FCO
Programs: BA Gold, etc. etc.
Posts: 1,402
Air travelers to U.S. set to face tougher COVID-19 testing
#3
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US/UK - and elsewhere
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 2,559
Currently the LFTs are all that are needed for air-entry to the US. The key thing is the timing. 3 days (to me) has always been too long given the potential contacts between testing and flying.
#4
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Programs: BA GfL & GGL, FB Platinum, MB Titanium, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,403
The quarantine is the killer as it puts and end to any short weekend or business trips. Plus who is going to want to spend all that money to have to quarantine for that period of time. People just won’t travel to the US.
#5
Join Date: Nov 2010
Programs: UA Premier Platinum, DL Platinum
Posts: 597
The administration is also considering whether to require air travelers to get another COVID-19 test within three to five days after arrival in the United States, officials said.
The CDC did not confirm that, but noted it continues to recommend all "travelers should get a COVID-19 viral test 3-5 days after arrival" and "post-travel quarantine for any unvaccinated travelers."
The CDC did not confirm that, but noted it continues to recommend all "travelers should get a COVID-19 viral test 3-5 days after arrival" and "post-travel quarantine for any unvaccinated travelers."
Mid-term (months to 1-2 years from now), I think the best strategy will be for international airports to set up on-site rapid PCR testing centers with internationally agreed-upon standards and regulated prices so that people can test 2-3 hours before departure. Show up, test, bag check, get result, clear security. You might need to scan your test result QR to clear outbound passport control. (You could also test elsewhere within a day of departure.)
#6
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAS/FCO/JFK/LAX
Programs: DL DM/2MM, BA GGL/CCR,/GFL, A3 Gold, JBU Mosaic, ITA Executive, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 305
Based on the Reuters article OP shared, it sounds like the quarantine requirement would remain only for unvaccinated travelers. Others would simply be required to test again:
At the very least, it's not at all clear from the article that a general quarantine would be necessary.
Mid-term (months to 1-2 years from now), I think the best strategy will be for international airports to set up on-site rapid PCR testing centers with internationally agreed-upon standards and regulated prices so that people can test 2-3 hours before departure. Show up, test, bag check, get result, clear security. You might need to scan your test result QR to clear outbound passport control. (You could also test elsewhere within a day of departure.)
At the very least, it's not at all clear from the article that a general quarantine would be necessary.
Mid-term (months to 1-2 years from now), I think the best strategy will be for international airports to set up on-site rapid PCR testing centers with internationally agreed-upon standards and regulated prices so that people can test 2-3 hours before departure. Show up, test, bag check, get result, clear security. You might need to scan your test result QR to clear outbound passport control. (You could also test elsewhere within a day of departure.)
if it hasn’t been set up at most airports from the day and age of a 500 dollars 24-hours PCR (near LAX, OCT 2020, shameless) it is because someone is profiting big time from this mess and would not give up that profit so easily
#7
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: BAEC Silver, IHG Diamond
Posts: 7,772
My issue with testing a short time frame prior to flying is getting to somewhere to test.
I don't live in say London, where I can pop to numerous test centres on the Tube or by car, get a test and go home.
I'm 2hrs away from the nearest places, so a 4hr round-trip. If I'm working all day, I can't get to these places before they shut, and postal tests take too long.
Next week, I'm flying early Friday morning and need a PCR test. Need to take the Thursday off work to get a test done and to get the result back in time. Early flight again 2 days later, so have to take another test after arrival to make sure it comes back in time.
I don't live in say London, where I can pop to numerous test centres on the Tube or by car, get a test and go home.
I'm 2hrs away from the nearest places, so a 4hr round-trip. If I'm working all day, I can't get to these places before they shut, and postal tests take too long.
Next week, I'm flying early Friday morning and need a PCR test. Need to take the Thursday off work to get a test done and to get the result back in time. Early flight again 2 days later, so have to take another test after arrival to make sure it comes back in time.
#8
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,237
It has to be said that at the moment there is no certain rule, these are all speculative pieces from the press. Surely leaked by the powers that be, but still speculation atm.
But I’m ready to bet they’ll enforce something that will make my forthcoming family visit to the US next to impossible.
But I’m ready to bet they’ll enforce something that will make my forthcoming family visit to the US next to impossible.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: living near Malaga
Programs: BA Gold , Mucci recipient. Coffee Drinker, Blue Sky Thinker
Posts: 2,112
#11
Join Date: May 2017
Location: YEG, SFO, VCA, JR JY-13
Programs: hahaha
Posts: 922
I feel like that since throughout the pandemic, the land border entry rules (w/ Canada) and air border rules were administered differently, if this policy goes ahead we're gonna see some people arrive in Canada and drive across to continue their trip. Gotta do whatever it takes to have that Christmas!
#13
Join Date: Jan 2019
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 146
Feel so sorry for Airline industry, they been well shafted again.
#15
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: AA Platinum for Life (2MM), BR Gold, AS MVP Gold, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 978
I have no idea how a post-arrival quarantine would be enforced, from a practical standpoint. Yes there is precedent for enforcement mechanisms — at the state or local level — but it’s always been patchy at best.