Community
Wiki Posts
Search

No Effective Mask Compliance onboard

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2021, 10:51 pm
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by IDM79
So if this is the case, then I should be free to not wear a mask anywhere since I've tested negative for the virus and I'm willing to accept the nearly 100% odds that anyone halfway healthy who catches this virus will be perfectly fine. Spread the word.
Provided you got the test within the last 30 seconds, sure. Otherwise you might have become infected since then.

It's really nice of you to accept the odds that anyone who catches the disease from you will be fine. Such a major risk you're taking.
sethb is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 12:22 am
  #32  
Moderator: Hyatt Gold Passport & Star Alliance
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: London, UK
Programs: UA-1K 3MM/HY- LT Globalist/BA-GGL/GfL
Posts: 12,090
I had a similar issue with a teenager in Club to MEX in December. Interventions by crew and captain had no impact on this young man. His parents decided not to intervene.
My concern was that he was having to step over me to get out of his centre seat. In the end all of my tests have come back negative, but as a British Rule-Follower, it did irk me.
Markie is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 12:35 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,754
Originally Posted by IDM79
So if this is the case, then I should be free to not wear a mask anywhere since I've tested negative for the virus and I'm willing to accept the nearly 100% odds that anyone halfway healthy who catches this virus will be perfectly fine. Spread the word.
You are free to allow another person around you to not wear a mask if it is just the two of you together and you accept the risk. You are NOT free to not wear your own mask when you are around other people who have not explicitly consented. Unfortunately for some people, along with your rights (freedom, liberty, constitution etc) you also have responsibilities (laws, social etiquette etc).

Perhaps the easiest way to understand it is like passive smoking - you should not light a cigarette on a plane (or restaurant, supermarket etc) as even though you have consented to breath smoke, the other people around you have not.
stewardo, pilot007, Gerbs and 2 others like this.
8420PR is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 12:54 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver (for now)
Posts: 1,000
Originally Posted by Often1
The complaint is also worth it because the more of them there are, the more it demonstrates that health is a customer service matter to the customers.

Many poorly-trained staff think that by not annoying the violators, they keep their business. They need to understand that they lose others.
I think that’s unfair.

Crew can only do so much once you are on your way, same applies in TfL.
Will100 is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 1:05 am
  #35  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,821
In our COVID-19 vaccination centre, run by the NHS (indirectly) and the local GPs Primary Care Network (directly), with at least 10 doctors on site, we cannot and do not insist people wear masks. Thousands of people pass through daily. The overwhelming majority do wear masks. I regularly vaccinate people who won't wear a mask even though I'm laying hands on them and in close proximity, though I was vaccinated several weeks back. In that context it's quite useful to park any sense of being judgemental, and think the best of people rather than the worst.
bakera, IAMORGAN, Gerbs and 5 others like this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 1:26 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: BAEC Silver, IHG Diamond
Posts: 7,770
Did see a few flights last year at MAN where staff were enforcing mask wearing at the gate and would refuse travel if no doctor's note was presented. Some lanyard, potentially purchased on eBay, wasn't acceptable and 99% of people were fine.
Also had a couple of flights where people were removed by the police, at the captain's request, after they refused to put their masks back on after boarding, after being asked to do so by the crew.
xenole is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 1:38 am
  #37  
Moderator: Hyatt Gold Passport & Star Alliance
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: London, UK
Programs: UA-1K 3MM/HY- LT Globalist/BA-GGL/GfL
Posts: 12,090
Originally Posted by xenole
Did see a few flights last year at MAN where staff were enforcing mask wearing at the gate and would refuse travel if no doctor's note was presented. Some lanyard, potentially purchased on eBay, wasn't acceptable and 99% of people were fine.
Also had a couple of flights where people were removed by the police, at the captain's request, after they refused to put their masks back on after boarding, after being asked to do so by the crew.
I am sure that the announcement from the pilot on the way back from MEX mentioned having to have notified the airline before travel about exemption.
Markie is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 1:49 am
  #38  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 963
For TATL travel, for those who are permitted to do so, I would recommend flying a US carrier. They tend to be militant on masks (I was on a domestic flight last week in the US where 5 of 12 people in a UA F cabin were individually scolded for not replacing masks between bites and sips) and there are no exceptions unless you are under two. The UK’s tolerance of people claiming medical reasons for not being able to wear a mask is excessively generous.
KSVVZ2015 is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 3:48 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: BA - Blue > Bronze > Silver > Bronze > Blue
Posts: 6,812
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
In our COVID-19 vaccination centre, run by the NHS (indirectly) and the local GPs Primary Care Network (directly), with at least 10 doctors on site, we cannot and do not insist people wear masks. Thousands of people pass through daily. The overwhelming majority do wear masks. I regularly vaccinate people who won't wear a mask even though I'm laying hands on them and in close proximity, though I was vaccinated several weeks back. In that context it's quite useful to park any sense of being judgemental, and think the best of people rather than the worst.
At best they’re misguided fools.

The numbers who can’t wear a mask for 5 mins are so tiny the chances of coming across a single one are pretty much slim to none.

The whole ‘I’m exempt’ thing has sadly just highlighted how selfish so much of the British population now are.
Cap'n Benj is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 4:55 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Programs: BA Blue, IC Spire Ambassador
Posts: 5,228
Originally Posted by adrianlondon
By other people not wearing masks.
Not just that but if I felt a person was sitting closer than I liked or if they had a cough, I moved. What I won’t do, though, and this is just me, is judge those people. The lockdown and everything that all the other rules involve, has affected everyone differently and you never know what they’re experiencing that day. I also know that thoughts affect behaviour and speaking for me (recognising others are different) if I sat there getting cross, it would ultimately only end up punishing myself by putting me in a bad mood. So I just try to take myself out of the situation. On a plane, no idea what I’d do but in my view crew have a lot going on too & so expecting them to act as police too on an issue that always generates a debate and has shades of grey in terms of exemption (masks) is again not something I would do. I think a little kindness and tolerance goes a long way.

As I said before, I don’t have ‘the answer’ - maybe there isn’t ‘an’ answer to the issue.
adrianlondon and the810 like this.
IAMORGAN is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 4:56 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: VIE
Programs: SAS EBS / *A Silver, Hilton Diamond, Radisson VIP, IHG Platinum Ambassador
Posts: 3,777
All these eternal conflicts could be solved so easily. Rather than relying on masks to protect others, allow everyone wear a respirator with a valve that protects them - if they want to. Done. Better for everyone.

People afraid of catching covid could finally protect themselves properly and wouldn't have to rely on others to wear their masks correctly (you can force people to wear a mask, but you have no control over how they use it). Their protection would increase significantly.

People who can't or don't want to use PPE would be able to not wear a mask, because others are already protecting themselves.

Better protection for those who want it, less tension in society... I can't wrap my head around why we haven't switched to this model yet.
kingstontoon and SxMan like this.
the810 is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 6:52 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,591
Originally Posted by the810
I can't wrap my head around why we haven't switched to this model yet.
Partly because reports said people could get the droplets in through their eyes, partly because it would not protect the very few who genuinely can't wear masks but otherwise would, and partly because they're more expensive and in (or would quickly become) shorter supply than surgical masks.

I take ianmorgan's approach by wearing an N95 and simply keeping distance from people were possible. Apart from the mask, my general hygiene behaviours haven't changed over the years and seem to have served me well to date,
adrianlondon is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 7:41 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: VIE
Programs: SAS EBS / *A Silver, Hilton Diamond, Radisson VIP, IHG Platinum Ambassador
Posts: 3,777
Originally Posted by adrianlondon
Partly because reports said people could get the droplets in through their eyes
​​​​
It can happen but it's rare. I believe benefits of being better protected against infection via your nose/mouth are much bigger than potential risk of being infected via eyes.
the810 is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 7:44 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,591
Originally Posted by the810
It can happen but it's rare. I believe benefits of being better protected against infection via your nose/mouth are much bigger than potential risk of being infected via eyes.
I'd go even further and say very rare. I'm not basing this on any academic research though, just my thought that there can't be many droplets getting in through my eyes!
adrianlondon is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2021, 7:55 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Programs: BA Blue, IC Spire Ambassador
Posts: 5,228
Originally Posted by KSVVZ2015
For TATL travel, for those who are permitted to do so, I would recommend flying a US carrier. They tend to be militant on masks (I was on a domestic flight last week in the US where 5 of 12 people in a UA F cabin were individually scolded for not replacing masks between bites and sips) and there are no exceptions unless you are under two. The UK’s tolerance of people claiming medical reasons for not being able to wear a mask is excessively generous.
I worry we can get too Animal Farm ‘4 legs good 2 legs bad’ about it.

The thing with this is where is the line? I recall Jenny Harries deputy cmo saying she worried about people basically infecfing themselves with their mask. Ie go to Costa, put mask on table / touch table / touch mask / put mask back on. So since then, rightly or wrongly I’ve tried to avoid constantly taking mask on or off. Not really been anywhere where ive had to wear it whilst eating but if im eating a meal it seems excessive to replace it between forkfuls of food, between courses, fine. But it again highlights the shades of grey.
adrianlondon likes this.
IAMORGAN is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.