BA9119 LHR-DPS 15th June
#16
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 113
champ
#17
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: SE England
Programs: AF-KL Platinum, ALL Platinum
Posts: 755
The aircraft that operated the repatriation flight yesterday was G-YMMC. That is (or was...) a LGW-based 772. LGW had a subfleet of recently refurbished RR 772 aircraft so distance is not an issue. The GE ones couldn’t operate it due to lack of crew rest facilities.
champ
champ
#18
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA GGL, A3*G, Mucci de l'expertise des Apps
Posts: 3,366
It can make it when you only use 65% of the seats. The real issue is the flight back against the winds, and for that you can't bring much along with you at all. Remember that the runway at DPS is also 600 metres shorter than either DEL or KNO.
Last edited by Airprox; Jun 16, 2020 at 7:17 am
#19
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Up North.
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 311
The only time I have flown on BA long haul was LHR-BKK-LHR last year. It was in WT on an old B772 (tiny, low resolution IFE). The two worst flights I have experienced and I will never do that again. So I would not envy anyone flying BA WT LGW-DPS on a B772 for a holiday - if that ever route ever happens or holidays are allowed ever again.
The old 772s are absolutely horrible in WT (and most other cabins to be fair). Whilst I've not been paying a huge amount of attention to the future fleet guesswork, I'd imagine they won't hang around for long in the post-covid world.
#20
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Beckenham
Programs: BA Gold, AccorLL Gold
Posts: 17
Of course the 772 that flew the route yesterday was a refurbished model with the Panasonic IFE - the best in the fleet. Although 10 abreast in economy they're nice enough to fly.
The old 772s are absolutely horrible in WT (and most other cabins to be fair). Whilst I've not been paying a huge amount of attention to the future fleet guesswork, I'd imagine they won't hang around for long in the post-covid world.
The old 772s are absolutely horrible in WT (and most other cabins to be fair). Whilst I've not been paying a huge amount of attention to the future fleet guesswork, I'd imagine they won't hang around for long in the post-covid world.
#21
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Programs: Many. Too many. I came here to cut them down. I failed.
Posts: 2,999
GA could could not make LHR-DPS work (via KNO) with a B77W (and latter a A339) three (dropped to two) times a week. GA became farcical with they regular cancel/reinstate of LHR-CGK and then LHR-KNO-DPS routes over the past few years. But LHR appeared to be a vanity destination for GA. Having flown GA quite alot their cabin product/service far exceeds BA - it's just the GA management that make the problems. If the pandemic had not happen then DPS could have been Gatwick long haul holiday destination along with MRU, CPT, LIM and the many islands in the Caribbean. But the distance to DPS is further so could it have been done regularly with a LGW based B772?
BA staff WERE in Jakarta to look at setting up an opening up a flight when GA were operating LHR-CGK-SIN-LHR rotations, but it was never clear what became of that - or if it was an intended add-on to the Singapore terminator. Always worth keeping an eye on BA for Indonesia routes as they had some good fares that allowed add-ons on 3K/JQ/SQ/MH/MI and domestically on GA.
Last edited by Sam Bee; Jun 17, 2020 at 7:45 am