Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

IAG signs LOI for 200 737MAX - some for BA LGW

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

IAG signs LOI for 200 737MAX - some for BA LGW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2019, 3:57 am
  #271  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Split between MAN & AKL
Programs: BAEC GGL/CCR, SkyMiles Gold, Mucci deux fois
Posts: 619
I’ve just got back from a Seattle trip.

The 737 backlog is visibly striking; green fuselages stacked in long lines on railway lines far downstream from Renton, many stored up at Paine Field, the car parking lot at BFI is absolutely full, the fuel testing line at Renton is stuffed with new builds all wrapped up for long term storage.

It appears what is keeping them ticking over are 77Fs for FedEx, the Dreamliner line and the Poseidon, which they seem to be cranking out at an almighty pace.

BFI employee car park:


orbitmic and nancypants like this.
PrimaVista is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2019, 4:20 am
  #272  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by sxc
The images of the 737s parked in the employee car parks are somewhat surreal.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...e5224b2530.jpg
Are those aircraft standing on bricks?

In all seriousness, though, the answer to that may also be the answer to Wong Jnr's observation.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2019, 4:50 am
  #273  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,597
Originally Posted by Globaliser
Are those aircraft standing on bricks?

In all seriousness, though, the answer to that may also be the answer to Wong Jnr's observation.
I think they are chocks around the wheels, to stop them rolling down hill and making even more problems for Boeing.
rapidex is online now  
Old Jul 12, 2019, 4:53 am
  #274  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Split between MAN & AKL
Programs: BAEC GGL/CCR, SkyMiles Gold, Mucci deux fois
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by Globaliser
Are those aircraft standing on bricks?

In all seriousness, though, the answer to that may also be the answer to Wong Jnr's observation.
weight distributor pads. The gear is wrapped and sealed in protective plastic.
PrimaVista is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2019, 6:08 am
  #275  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,628
I noticed these last week at MAN.

DYKWIA is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2019, 10:47 am
  #276  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK.
Programs: SQ LPPS, A3 *G, BA Silver aiming for Bronze
Posts: 1,506
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
I noticed these last week at MAN.
Hopefully they will stay there until they are broken up!
Skipcool3 and LGWClosedAgain like this.
lhrpete is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2019, 5:56 pm
  #277  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Programs: Plat Pro AAdvantage, but defected to BAEC
Posts: 1,222
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
I noticed these last week at MAN.

just as well that wasn’t LPL, or those aircraft too would be up on bricks!
Reetmafreen is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2019, 8:19 pm
  #278  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,208
From OMAAT IAG CEO explains 737 max order

except a letter of intent isn't an order!

Appears Willie is more bothered about airbus delays re Neo orders and is wanting to presurise them with this supposed 'order' for the MAX/

I think Airbus knows what is going on and won't do too much to appease Willie. Boeing also knows this and is just playing the game as well.

Where are the grown-ups?
UKtravelbear is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2019, 2:03 am
  #279  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,580
Originally Posted by UKtravelbear
Appears Willie is more bothered about airbus delays re Neo orders and is wanting to presurise them with this supposed 'order' for the MAX/

I think Airbus knows what is going on and won't do too much to appease Willie. Boeing also knows this and is just playing the game as well.
If that's the case, Willie is frankly dumb. As you said, the objective situation is very clear to all involved. If this LoI is not aiming to purchase the actual planes then it serves absolutely zero purpose.

If anyone feels that Airbus will concede discounts, speed ups or whatever just because IAG are signing an LoI which is merely associating their name with a currently toxic model which looks unlikely to be deliverable within the times it states, they are about as realistic as those people who come to FT to say that they have booked two separate itineraries with one hour in between them, miss their BA departure because their first flight got delayed by half an hour, and then go to BA to shout that BA owes them reaccommodation and compensation and threaten to write to their solicitor if BA does not indulge.

There is no worse negotiating position than over-estimating and over-playing your hand when the other person has all the cards that matter. You merely come across as incompetent and ill-informed and risk having to stick to your threat which you never intended to in the first place if you do not wish to lose face and credibility for many years to come.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2019, 4:15 am
  #280  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Helvetia
Programs: AS; BA Silver; UA; HH Gold; Sprüngli Connaisseur
Posts: 2,916
I'm thinking that the LOI was basically to cut Ryanair off from slipping in and buying a bunch of aircraft at low prices like they have in the past after a major news event occurred.
greg5 is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2019, 4:39 am
  #281  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,777
Originally Posted by greg5
I'm thinking that the LOI was basically to cut Ryanair off from slipping in and buying a bunch of aircraft at low prices like they have in the past after a major news event occurred.
Doubt it was that. Ryanair already has a huge order for the Max so unlikely they’d be piling in for more right now...
irishguy28 likes this.
Ldnn1 is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2019, 9:48 am
  #282  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Split between MAN & AKL
Programs: BAEC GGL/CCR, SkyMiles Gold, Mucci deux fois
Posts: 619
I do get the feeling Willie is still smarting at not getting more A380s at the price he wanted. Whilst there is undoubtedly an element of opportunism in this LOI., I also think this is a deliberate and very public case of picking up his toys and walking away from Airbus to remind them they do not have anything like preferred supplier status.

Competition is good, after all...
lhrpete likes this.
PrimaVista is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2019, 1:17 pm
  #283  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 5 miles from EMA
Programs: BD, BAEC Pleb, VS Pleb, Accor Pleb, HHonors Gold, Big White Season Pass
Posts: 5,909
Originally Posted by PrimaVista
I do get the feeling Willie is still smarting at not getting more A380s at the price he wanted. Whilst there is undoubtedly an element of opportunism in this LOI., I also think this is a deliberate and very public case of picking up his toys and walking away from Airbus to remind them they do not have anything like preferred supplier status.

Competition is good, after all...
Except that this could backfire spectacularly if Boeing can’t get the plane back in the air in anything like a reasonable timescale
Tiger_lily is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2019, 3:55 pm
  #284  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 262
Originally Posted by PrimaVista
I do get the feeling Willie is still smarting at not getting more A380s at the price he wanted. Whilst there is undoubtedly an element of opportunism in this LOI., I also think this is a deliberate and very public case of picking up his toys and walking away from Airbus to remind them they do not have anything like preferred supplier status.

Competition is good, after all...
But if you look at the big picture, it makes no sense. Yes, Airbus has the big pie in the short haul with the A32X, but what about the long haul?

Where was WW when Airbus needed IAG to buy more A380s to keep the line alive until possible neo decision was made? BA was clearly looking into that. Why keep ordering 77Ws when you'll be receiving A35Ks and could very well order A359s instead and kickstarting the 772s replacement cycle? And was the 777-9 order to spite airbus instead of more A35Ks or a regret for not ordering more A380s? Or was it political, like some of 77Xs orders are?

If WW is playing games with Airbus and mad with them I'm pretty sure Airbus is not happy as well, not only there isn't a single widebody order in sight for Airbus in the near future, not only BA keeps adding Boeing's at will, be it 787-10s, 77Ws or 777-9s but now also gave Boeing the maintenance contract for its Airbus short haul fleet. And despite the short haul being the cash cow for airplane makers due to their impressive volume, the big bucks are made in the widebodies.

So I'm not sure what's to gain with this LoI or with WWs latest comments. Yes, it will look good in IAGs finance reports but it will not make Airbus lower their prices or be friendlier, especially considering the widebody and maintenance situation.
justatourist is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2019, 5:19 pm
  #285  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,597
Originally Posted by justatourist
But if you look at the big picture, it makes no sense. Yes, Airbus has the big pie in the short haul with the A32X, but what about the long haul?

Where was WW when Airbus needed IAG to buy more A380s to keep the line alive until possible neo decision was made? BA was clearly looking into that. Why keep ordering 77Ws when you'll be receiving A35Ks and could very well order A359s instead and kickstarting the 772s replacement cycle? And was the 777-9 order to spite airbus instead of more A35Ks or a regret for not ordering more A380s? Or was it political, like some of 77Xs orders are?

If WW is playing games with Airbus and mad with them I'm pretty sure Airbus is not happy as well, not only there isn't a single widebody order in sight for Airbus in the near future, not only BA keeps adding Boeing's at will, be it 787-10s, 77Ws or 777-9s but now also gave Boeing the maintenance contract for its Airbus short haul fleet. And despite the short haul being the cash cow for airplane makers due to their impressive volume, the big bucks are made in the widebodies.

So I'm not sure what's to gain with this LoI or with WWs latest comments. Yes, it will look good in IAGs finance reports but it will not make Airbus lower their prices or be friendlier, especially considering the widebody and maintenance situation.
No widebody order for Airbus? What about the option BA holds for 36 A350-1000's.
lhrpete likes this.
rapidex is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.