Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Galleries Lounges Future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2018, 1:10 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 344
Originally Posted by drakepassage


The difference between GC and GF is slim to marginal anyway, readily available champagne being the only stand-out one. I wouldn’t say even GF is comparable to VS J lounge.
There is champagne in GC

The biggest differences are food and GF being less crowded.
flyer200 is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2018, 2:08 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: EDI
Programs: BAEC GGL
Posts: 181
I quite liked tha MAD Lounge, but it was quiet and that makes a difference. The biggest challenge at T5 is how busy the lounges are, but I’ve got to admit that the Flounge with it’S dedicated entry via the F Wing security is currently my favourite way to travel. I had a domestic ticket wrapped around out Beijing trip last month and my wife was a wee bit concerned about how that would work in case of delays etc. The F wing now has her convinced that it’s easier to go out and come back in than to do a T5 flight connection and take the risk that the security staff have abandoned Fast Track again.

however, the surprise and gem for me had been the Gatwick Flounge. It and the new regular lounge have made me try and avoid Gatwick less. The food is pretty good and even being “downgraded” for an hour when the Flounge is shut at 8pm is ok as the regular lounge is pretty decent. I actually think BA are doing a good job with their London lounges, the main issue is the volume of pax that pass through them.
JP Flyer is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2018, 2:38 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Scotland
Programs: BA Exec Club (Silver)
Posts: 454
Originally Posted by UKtravelbear
lol

what makes you think making one large lounge would improve things? BA would use it to reduce the GF offering to the GC service and not do any improvements!
Qantas do it at HKG and, in my limited experience, they’ve done it brilliantly and it’s a fantastic lounge.

A bar area with high stools serving made to order signature cocktails, served champagne, and BBQ pork cut and served to order. Self service drink stations with wine, beer and spirits. Various seating areas, from communal dining tables, to a cinema style arrangement infront of a large TV, to private corners, to individual chairs & tables facing the apron, with large screen TVs dotted around the entire lounge. Beautiful shower facilities which are plentiful meaning queuing or waiting is unlikely with staff on hand to supply toiletries and towels. Staff on hand around the lounge to regularly clear tables and take orders.

Being an infrequent flyer I’m a big fan of T5 Galleries Club. I find it easy to find a quiet corner to relax and treat myself to a few drinks and a snack before my flight. Despite the regular criticism on here, I really enjoy my time there.

The Qantas lounge in HKG was a real eye opener for me in what you can do by combining J & F lounges and providing a great service and experience for everyone.

Last edited by GlasgowBlue; Jun 16, 2018 at 2:45 pm
GlasgowBlue is online now  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 5:14 am
  #19  
Hilton Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,720
Qantas have done the same at LHR T3, but there is little chance that BA would combine GF and GC with a product that is significantly better than GF is today.
EuropeanPete is online now  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 5:37 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,683
Using the IB lounge in Madrid made me think more positively of GF. Thought the IB offering poor in comparison. I guess that’s the problem with so much of this, guest experience subjective.

Still don’t understand the love for CX T3, it’s fine, but the OTT remarks for it leave me rather, what?
dougzz is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 5:41 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 1,222
cws mentioned the rotation of different hot meals in GC however they are all a sloppy mess with hardly any consistency or flavour.

The sandwiches are the only thing I eat in there bar the crisps and cheese.
smokie36 is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 5:42 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 1,222
In fact even the drink snacks are designed to leave you not wanting a second helping.

GC food is truly appalling in my view.
smokie36 is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 5:43 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,683
The thing with comparisons to lounges like Qantas in T3 or HK is that they’re not serving hundreds of SH status passengers. I believe the GC are often packed with people that wouldn’t have achieved appropriate status on other airlines. How many major airlines offer lounge access to their mid tier, and have mid tier achievable with one carefully routed Business flight to the US.
dougzz is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 5:46 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,399
Originally Posted by smokie36
cws mentioned the rotation of different hot meals in GC however they are all a sloppy mess with hardly any consistency or flavour.

.....................................
But not even consistently sloppy .......
smokie36 likes this.
subject2load is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 6:09 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 532
Originally Posted by GlasgowBlue


Qantas do it at HKG and, in my limited experience, they’ve done it brilliantly and it’s a fantastic lounge.

The Qantas lounge in HKG was a real eye opener for me in what you can do by combining J & F lounges and providing a great service and experience for everyone.
Yeah, all the QF HKG lounge needs to be perfect is the Cathay F showers and a view of the aeroplanes rather than the queue for the BA gates!

That said, it's never dealing with the volume of GC pax and as a combined F/J lounge it's a bit like the QR T4 lounge and a direct comparison is probably unfair.
tinkicker is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 6:13 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,252
Originally Posted by dougzz
Still don’t understand the love for CX T3, it’s fine, but the OTT remarks for it leave me rather, what?
Personal preference, I suppose. I would recommend everyone that thinks they prefer BA lounges to stay there, the CX lounge is really no better
dougzz likes this.
lost_in_translation is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 6:13 am
  #27  
Community Director
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norwich, UK
Programs: A3*G, BA Gold, BD Gold (in memoriam), IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 8,477
I’d think it would be a difficult sell for BA, in its main hub where it’s by some distance the dominant airline, not to offer what is effectively a dedicated Emerald lounge. AA’s Flagship policy has muddied the waters a little, but all the other major oneworld airlines offer something distinctive - QR at DOH, CX at HKG, QF in the International terminal at SYD, AY at HEL, MH at KUL.

It’s not necessarily what you produce - CX’s Business/Sapphire lounges at HKG may well outrank Galleries F - but the message it sends. A joint J/F lounge is only ever going to be viewed, in relative terms, as a downgrade from a dedicated F lounge.
NWIFlyer is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 8:23 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: PVD, BOS
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 1,664
I’m surprised BA hasn’t gone the AA route with lounge access. AA elites flying domestic J don’t get lounge access at all (premium tcon pax excepted). It’s a bit strange that BA gives lounge access to CE flyers, while they don’t even have a dedicated J hard product on their intra Europe narrowbodies. If they eliminated lounge access for these folks, they could use those resources to provide a better product for their long haul customers. After all, do you really need lounge access before a 2hr flight?

That said, the BA lounge in BOS is actually pretty nice. Probably one of the best lounges at BOS, though in fairness I’ve not tried the LH or EK lounges.
swingaling is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 8:27 am
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,262
Originally Posted by swingaling
... If they eliminated lounge access for these folks, they could use those resources to provide a better product for their long haul customers. After all, do you really need lounge access before a 2hr flight?
YES considering how dire a lot of the CE catering is now
markle likes this.
mikeyfly is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2018, 8:38 am
  #30  
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Cumbria
Programs: BAEC GGL/CCR, Hilton Diamond, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 4,510
Originally Posted by swingaling
I’m surprised BA hasn’t gone the AA route with lounge access. AA elites flying domestic J don’t get lounge access at all (premium tcon pax excepted). It’s a bit strange that BA gives lounge access to CE flyers, while they don’t even have a dedicated J hard product on their intra Europe narrowbodies. If they eliminated lounge access for these folks, they could use those resources to provide a better product for their long haul customers. After all, do you really need lounge access before a 2hr flight?

That said, the BA lounge in BOS is actually pretty nice. Probably one of the best lounges at BOS, though in fairness I’ve not tried the LH or EK lounges.
To truly align BA with AA you would need to remove lounge access for all status passengers as well as those travelling in CE (perhaps even some none CE flights that are shorter than say 6 hours
regardless if using a LH aircraft). Doing so would significantly reduce the number of eligible passengers using the lounges each day. BA could then reduce the size of the lounges and perhaps look to improve the quality. However, they would probably lose a lot of customers alongside this. There are significantly more competitors for European travel than there is in the States.
madfish is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.