BA Needs Competition - Economist
Jun 5, 2017, 1:14 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Vancouver, CA
Programs: AC 35K
Posts: 673
BA Needs Competition - Economist
Hi all,
Haven't seen this posted around here, but please merge if I missed the thread.
Interesting article on the Economist regarding the need for more competition for BA in order for it to improve its service and product standards. Agree with the fact that more competition would result in a better product, however not sure how realistic the proposed idea of a new full-service Heathrow-based carrier is. Seems a bit ambitious and idealistic, especially since my understanding is a third runway is still not guaranteed.
article here: http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulli...6/share-spoils
Cheers,
TUF
Haven't seen this posted around here, but please merge if I missed the thread.
Interesting article on the Economist regarding the need for more competition for BA in order for it to improve its service and product standards. Agree with the fact that more competition would result in a better product, however not sure how realistic the proposed idea of a new full-service Heathrow-based carrier is. Seems a bit ambitious and idealistic, especially since my understanding is a third runway is still not guaranteed.
article here: http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulli...6/share-spoils
Cheers,
TUF
Jun 5, 2017, 1:20 pm
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,230
Interesting.
I'm no expert on these matters, but BA does seem to suffer from complacency and arrogance in respect of its position in the marketplace. How that could be shifted is, of course, the $100m question.
I'm no expert on these matters, but BA does seem to suffer from complacency and arrogance in respect of its position in the marketplace. How that could be shifted is, of course, the $100m question.
Jun 5, 2017, 1:41 pm
#3
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: West Sussex
Programs: BA Gold, VS Gold
Posts: 916
BA do have a competitor, albeit a significantly smaller one - Virgin Atlantic.
In my mind if Virgin had more landing slots and were able to target the business traveller market as BA do, especially since now they have the Delta tie up for domestic US connections, BA would no longer be able to be so complacent.
I don't see the need for a brand new carrier to compete, just take some of BA's landing slots away and give it to the other flag carrier.
In my mind if Virgin had more landing slots and were able to target the business traveller market as BA do, especially since now they have the Delta tie up for domestic US connections, BA would no longer be able to be so complacent.
I don't see the need for a brand new carrier to compete, just take some of BA's landing slots away and give it to the other flag carrier.
Jun 5, 2017, 1:41 pm
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,320
There is competition it's just that BA has a very heavy level of inertia in many of it's customers who will stick with them no matter what they do and only fly with another airline if BA dosen't fly to their destination.
As mentioned on the 2 year extension thread some people might be tempted to try other airlines because their BA status is protected but I don't think the numbers doing that would even register with BA.
And even if people fly AA BA still benefits because of the JV.
Fly EI to Ireland and you are still in the same IAG family.
As mentioned on the 2 year extension thread some people might be tempted to try other airlines because their BA status is protected but I don't think the numbers doing that would even register with BA.
And even if people fly AA BA still benefits because of the JV.
Fly EI to Ireland and you are still in the same IAG family.
Jun 5, 2017, 1:54 pm
#7
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,578
(1) a tie up with an established shorthaul operation that is able to provide feeder traffic;
(2) a significant increase in LHR slots being made available.
The first would be a stretch unless LHR is opened to LCCs or BA is forced to open its shorthaul network on equitable terms to other longhaul carriers by regulatory intervention. The second won't happen until there is at least another runway at LHR and, more realistically, two.
Jun 5, 2017, 2:10 pm
#11
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 7,067
What ever residual loyalty BA had to to the UK had long gone. As it is now a Spanish company, run by foreigners and owned by a state accused of sponsoring ISIS I think the a full examination by the government is not a bad idea, with a view to breaking BA up or at least reducing their slots.
Jun 5, 2017, 2:13 pm
#12
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL/GFl, HH Diamond, BW Diamond, Virgin Voyages Deep Blue Extra, Blue Peter Badge Holder
Posts: 3,939
What ever residual loyalty BA had to to the UK had long gone. As it is now a Spanish company, run by foreigners and owned by a state accused of sponsoring ISIS I think the a full examination by the government is not a bad idea, with a view to breaking BA up or at least reducing their slots.
Jun 5, 2017, 2:17 pm
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,320
Was that before or after the 'dirty tricks' campaign that cost BA rather a lot of money?
virgin wins libel battle with BA
And isn't the JV little more than a price fix?
virgin wins libel battle with BA
And isn't the JV little more than a price fix?