Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

LGW & LHR selected 777s go 10-abreast (3-4-3) in Y 2018 onwards

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Oct 6, 2018, 2:19 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: Joeykins
Configurations (with links to AeroLOPA seatmaps, where available):

777-200ER
32J 48W 252Y (code 77S)
32J 52W 252Y (code 77T)
14F 48J 40W 134Y (code 77R)
48J 40W 184Y (New Club Suite) (code 77L)
8F 49J 40W 138Y (New Club Suite) (code 77M)


777-300ER
8F 76J 40W 130Y (New Club Suite) (code 77H)


Updated 777 aircraft now in service:

LGW Based Aircraft:
Completed (re-entry to service date):
G-VIIX - 08 March 2018
G-VIIR - 20 April 2018
G-VIIO - 23 May 2018
G-VIIP - 25 June 2018
G-VIIT - 07 October 2018
G-VIIU - 07 November 2018

G-VIIV - 25 January 2019 (currently operating from LHR)
G-VIIW - 02 April 2019 (currently operating from LHR)
G-YMMC - 15 May 2019
G-VIIY - 04 June 2019
(currently operating from LHR)
G-YMMF - 03 October 2019
G-YMMD - 01 November 2019
G-YMMB - 20 November 2019
G-YMME - 14 December 2019
G-YMMA - 14 July 2022

LHR Based Aircraft:
Completed (re-entry to service date):
G-RAES - 08 October 2019
G-VIIL - 31 January 2020
G-VIIK - 02 March 2020
G-VIIM - 20 March 2020
G-VIIN - 14 April 2020
G-VIIB - 25 April 2020
G-VIIF - 15 June 2020
G-VIIS - 12 July 2020
G-VIIC - 08 September 2020
G-STBM - 01 October 2020*
G-STBN - 05 October 2020*

G-YMMI - 08 October 2020
G-VIIG - 28 October 2020
G-STBO - 06 January 2021*
G-STBP - 08 January 2021*

G-VIID - 28 February 2021
G-YMMN - 04 March 2021
G-YMMO - 21 April 2021

G-VIIE - 29 April 2021

G-STBD - 20 July 2021
G-YMMP - 23 July 2021
G-VIIH - 16 August 2021
G-YMMJ - 03 September 2021
G-YMMH - 05 October 2021

G-VIIJ - 29 October 2021
G-VIIA - 14 December 2021

G-YMMG - 07 January 2022
G-YMML - 31 January 2022
G-YMMK - 24 February 2022
G-STBH - 31 March 2022
G-YMMT - 24 May 2022
G-STBG - 14 June 2022
G-STBK - 21 August 2022

G-STBL - 09 October 2022
G-STBJ - 27 November 2022

G-YMMS - 22 February 2023
G-YMMR - 31 March 2023

G-YMMU - 04 May 2023
G-STBA - 24 June 2023
G-STBE - 22 September 2023
G-STBF - 12 December 2023


In Progress at CWL:

<none>

Planned:
G-STBB - TBC (originally planned for March 2021)
G-STBC - TBC (originally planned for July 2021)
G-STBI - TBC
G-VIIV - TBC
G-VIIW - TBC
G-VIIY - TBC


*G-STBM/N/O/P were delivered new with cabins installed; date reflects entry into service rather than re-entry into service
Print Wikipost

LGW & LHR selected 777s go 10-abreast (3-4-3) in Y 2018 onwards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2016, 10:18 am
  #91  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,477
Originally Posted by Joely
I would be interested to know what was positive about the feedback? I struggle to imagine what is positive about more people in the same space.
The positive feedback would be from Non-Rev. Stand-by for flights would be much easier as few people (commercial passengers) would take BA in future! If next year Alex Cruz is nominated for the best employee of BA by staff, you know all airline employee is having a great time standing by for flight operated by BA.

My only flights with BA is in December which I booked a while ago for a domestic trip. After it would be A3, AA, CX, QR, EK and CA for me in future.
FlyerTalker688786 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 10:25 am
  #92  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by Andriyko
BA is not a low cost airline as its cost basis is rather high for well-known reasons. BA is removing certain 'frills' from and adding more seats to the economy cabin to compete with other airlines on price. The fact that BA is changing the economy product does not make it a low cost airline. And I see no problem with BA having premium cabins and a no frills economy cabin. True low cost carriers chose not to have a premium cabin or a FFP due to the costs involved. BA is in a very unenviable position - on the one hand it cannot slash costs low enough, and on the other hand there are no (or not enough) passengers who are happy to pay more for the so-called 'premium' to fly BA. The reality is that premium experience in economy is a thing of the past, at least in Europe and North America.
I agree with that but it doesn't explain the gutting of any comfort in short haul J (and I say this as someone who buys full fare refundable J tickets on Band 2-3 flights).
sts603 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 10:54 am
  #93  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: 1 thousand
Posts: 2,112
Originally Posted by SonTech
I had heard that they could make the sidewalls thinner and along with reducing the aisles its how they can go 10 across without reducing seat width.
You're probably thinking of the 777X (777-8 and 777-9). That's a completely new aircraft (same outer shell as the 777 with different walls inside, leading to 18" seats, at least that's what Boeing claim).
televisor is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 11:12 am
  #94  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London N8
Programs: BA (LTG), Miles&More (whatever the lowest level is), Oyster card (zones 1-2)
Posts: 891
What are the implications of the 'densification' (what a word) of the A320s/A321s? What does that mean for seat pitch?
ScruttonStreet is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 11:15 am
  #95  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: KSA
Programs: BA LTG, UA Gold, EK Silver, Hilton LT Diamond, Marriott LT Titanium, IHG Plat
Posts: 1,242
Wow..just wow.....considering most of "you lot" purport to fly in J or above, what do you care and you have no idea about a 10 abreast 777.

Being based in Dubai I fly EK all the time and in fact qualified for gold last year on sectors alone due to flying mostly on very cheap Y tickets. I am so used to flying on EK's 10 across 777's that when I went back to the UK a couple of weeks ago and there was a child playing up in the middle seat I was stretching across trying to see which poor person was sitting next to her only to realise that BA is 9 across. It looked very weird.

10 across on a 777 in Y is just fine as long as you have some decent IFE. TBH I can tell no difference between a current BA 777 and an EK 777 and given the choice I would pick an EK flight as better IFE, better food etc etc.

So, let's not gripe, let's not bash BA (for once) on something that really makes little difference (if done properly) and you can take that from someone who actually flies regularly on BA and EK 777's in Y.
moral_low_ground is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 11:31 am
  #96  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,347
Originally Posted by moral_low_ground
10 across on a 777 in Y is just fine as long as you have some decent IFE. TBH I can tell no difference between a current BA 777 and an EK 777 and given the choice I would pick an EK flight as better IFE, better food etc etc.
Each to their own I guess but my last long haul Y flight in economy was with EK on a 10 across 777 and I vowed never again as the experience was so awful. The seats were horribly narrow and the IFE and food definitely didn't make up for it.
cosmo74 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 11:42 am
  #97  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland
Programs: BA gold
Posts: 3,902
Except EK's 777 has slightly more seat pitch and is noticeable. Granted, not a lot more but in sardine-class, every inch helps. Seats are half an inch narrower than BA.

Sadly, the food is much better than BA these days.
Stez is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 11:49 am
  #98  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,683
Originally Posted by Stez
Except EK's 777 has slightly more seat pitch and is noticeable. Granted, not a lot more but in sardine-class, every inch helps. Seats are half an inch narrower than BA.

Sadly, the food is much better than BA these days.
Half an inch, so that's 4.5 inches gained where does the other 12 come from? Surely that's half an inch based on two entirely different measuring systems, outside of armrests, from centre of armrests, inside armrests? Is each aisle really 6 inches narrower? Do people shuffle down them sideways?
dougzz is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 11:55 am
  #99  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lewes
Programs: HiltonH. Gold Starwood Gold BA BLUES! Mucci.
Posts: 4,833
I am more concerned about shorthaul as that seat pitch will be tricky for me. 4 hours on an Athens flight, and no respite even in CE. Bad news BA.
Skipcool3 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 11:55 am
  #100  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Programs: Many. Too many. I came here to cut them down. I failed.
Posts: 2,999
Originally Posted by moral_low_ground
10 across on a 777 in Y is just fine as long as you have some decent IFE. TBH I can tell no difference between a current BA 777 and an EK 777 and given the choice I would pick an EK flight as better IFE, better food etc etc.

So, let's not gripe, let's not bash BA (for once) on something that really makes little difference (if done properly) and you can take that from someone who actually flies regularly on BA and EK 777's in Y.
Emirates have between 2-4 inch better seat pitch on each and every 777 - massively noticable. I tried out an AF 10 across 777 which has the same seat pitch as BA - it was genuinely horrific, awful, nasty. Saying that, it was only 2 hours, so I put up with it, and was very impressed with AF's food, drink, IFE and cleanliness (it was a brand new 777-300W to be fair).

BA's 10 across 777 will be a double whammy of teeny seats and meagre seat pitch. I'd challenge anyone to fly on Garuda's / SQ's 777's out of LHR and say BA come anywhere close (for comfort).
Sam Bee is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 12:05 pm
  #101  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,967
Originally Posted by dougzz
Half an inch, so that's 4.5 inches gained where does the other 12 come from? Surely that's half an inch based on two entirely different measuring systems, outside of armrests, from centre of armrests, inside armrests? Is each aisle really 6 inches narrower? Do people shuffle down them sideways?
Yes the aisles are very narrow. You will see a lot of people hit the seats with the bags/rollers.

Also the seats are usually pushed more towards the aircraft walls so if you are sitting in a window seat you may notice you are closer to the wall.
olouie is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 12:13 pm
  #102  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, TK Elite, HHonors Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 7,691
Originally Posted by sts603
I agree with that but it doesn't explain the gutting of any comfort in short haul J (and I say this as someone who buys full fare refundable J tickets on Band 2-3 flights).
I understand your feeling, similarly as I understand those guys who pay full fare to fly economy and yet they have to get the 'product' that the lowest average of the fares that the entire cabin paid for the flight. But for someone like me who now pays around USD500 to fly from Kiev to London in Club Europe (losing much of the flexibility of course) whereas I used to pay that much to fly in economy I don't mind the loss of more legroom. However, I am yet to see what the next tightening, if any, of the legroom will be. I no longer see any reason to fly Club anyway, unless I am connecting to the States. I am not sure what the corporate negotiated fares are but something tells me that they are not anywhere near the published fares though. I of course can say that you're paying for the flexibility but it is no consolation for getting tighter seating of course. As a realist I understand that no airline can tailor the product for full fare paying passengers when the majority of the cabin paid a fraction of that. Unfortunately the full paying passengers like yourself get penalized in the process. BTW - I think even I fares are changeable now.
I would be completely fine if BA or other European airlines installed proper business class seats and charged more for the privilege to fly there. That would mean the end of flying business class on shorthaul for me but it would be much fairer to passengers like you who pay the full price.
Andriyko is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 12:30 pm
  #103  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland
Programs: BA gold
Posts: 3,902
Originally Posted by olouie
Yes the aisles are very narrow. You will see a lot of people hit the seats with the bags/rollers.

Also the seats are usually pushed more towards the aircraft walls so if you are sitting in a window seat you may notice you are closer to the wall.
Indeed. Which means for those who prefer aisle seats, avoid the beginning and end of each cabin section, or the last row before it becomes 8-across due to the narrowing of the fuselad at the rear.

On the plus side with a 10-abreat configration on the EK 777s: there are more twin seats at the rear on EK, perfect for window seat lovers. However, BA's 777s have a different rear galley configuration and toilet arrangements which means they will have only three rows of twin seats vs up to five rows on EK.

Last edited by Stez; Nov 4, 2016 at 1:07 pm
Stez is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 1:04 pm
  #104  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,145
Stez is something of an experienced flyer in Y (policy) from UK to OZ... he has my deep sympathy.
T8191 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2016, 1:21 pm
  #105  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 5,380
Originally Posted by T8191
Stez is something of an experienced flyer in Y (policy) from UK to OZ... he has my deep sympathy.
You may be right. However, maybe he would have the new seat, new connectivity/recharging, Panasonic IFE and seat width would not be compromised through thinner walls/redesign. OK, a lot of maybes... but might he have something to look forward to?
Flexible preferences is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.