'To fly, to scrooge - The Economist'. Ouch!
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Programs: BA GCH
Posts: 89
'To fly, to scrooge - The Economist'. Ouch!
This has gotta hurt. Shame it's no longer stocked in the lounge/onboard too.
'Little by little, British Airways is chipping away at its good name'.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulli...08/fly-scrooge
'Little by little, British Airways is chipping away at its good name'.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulli...08/fly-scrooge
#2
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bristol (ex-Londoner)
Programs: BAEC Blue, VS Flying Club
Posts: 231
Originally Posted by The Article (emphasis mine)
It posted a £2.5 billion ($3.3 billion) net profit last year; equivalent to nearly half of all takings in the European airline market. Three factors have driven this success: slot restrictions at London Heathrow Airport, which suppress competition at BA’s home base; a merger-and-acquisition strategy under the flag of its holding company, International Airlines Group (IAG), which now also owns Iberia, Vueling and Aer Lingus; and a relentless dilution of BA’s once-superior customer service and on-board product.
#3
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Buckinghamshire
Programs: BAEC Gold Guest List, Hilton Honours Diamond, Accor Gold
Posts: 2,303
Different thread, same question: For those of us without Economist online subscription, could someone copy and paste the text of the article onto here?
#5
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bristol (ex-Londoner)
Programs: BAEC Blue, VS Flying Club
Posts: 231
I don't seem to need a subscription, but here we go:
BACK in the 1990s, British Airways, the nation’s flag-carrier, proclaimed itself to be “the world’s favourite airline” in a long-running and hugely successful advertising campaign. Watching its iconic TV commercials from sofas across the country, many Brits—a pint-sized, starry-eyed Gulliver among them—swelled with pride at what was, at the time, a genuinely treasured national asset. Were British Airways to run the same campaign today, it would probably stir a mixture of derision abroad and embarrassment at home.
Rising competition is partly to blame. In recent decades the Persian Gulf carriers have dethroned BA as the standard-bearers for long-haul service, while a new breed of low-cost carriers has attacked its short-haul dominance. Yet the loss of prestige in distant lands and market share close to home has not hit the airline’s finances. To the contrary, British Airways rakes in the cash. It posted a £2.5 billion ($3.3 billion) net profit last year; equivalent to nearly half of all takings in the European airline market. Three factors have driven this success: slot restrictions at London Heathrow Airport, which suppress competition at BA’s home base; a merger-and-acquisition strategy under the flag of its holding company, International Airlines Group (IAG), which now also owns Iberia, Vueling and Aer Lingus; and a relentless dilution of BA’s once-superior customer service and on-board product.
It was the global financial crisis that put BA on its new, thriftier flightpath. Willie Walsh, the airline’s former chief executive, who now steers IAG, claimed in 2009 that BA was in a “fight for survival” amid structural changes to the airline industry. As well as confronting trade unions, he removed free meals from short-haul flights; reduced free baggage allowances while simultaneously increasing excess weight charges; and imposed a fee for seat reservations. At the time, the airline insisted it had “no plans” to limit basic fares to carry-on luggage. They soon made them. It introduced “hand-baggage only” fares on some short-haul routes in 2013, imposing a surcharge for checked bags.
[snip]
Rising competition is partly to blame. In recent decades the Persian Gulf carriers have dethroned BA as the standard-bearers for long-haul service, while a new breed of low-cost carriers has attacked its short-haul dominance. Yet the loss of prestige in distant lands and market share close to home has not hit the airline’s finances. To the contrary, British Airways rakes in the cash. It posted a £2.5 billion ($3.3 billion) net profit last year; equivalent to nearly half of all takings in the European airline market. Three factors have driven this success: slot restrictions at London Heathrow Airport, which suppress competition at BA’s home base; a merger-and-acquisition strategy under the flag of its holding company, International Airlines Group (IAG), which now also owns Iberia, Vueling and Aer Lingus; and a relentless dilution of BA’s once-superior customer service and on-board product.
It was the global financial crisis that put BA on its new, thriftier flightpath. Willie Walsh, the airline’s former chief executive, who now steers IAG, claimed in 2009 that BA was in a “fight for survival” amid structural changes to the airline industry. As well as confronting trade unions, he removed free meals from short-haul flights; reduced free baggage allowances while simultaneously increasing excess weight charges; and imposed a fee for seat reservations. At the time, the airline insisted it had “no plans” to limit basic fares to carry-on luggage. They soon made them. It introduced “hand-baggage only” fares on some short-haul routes in 2013, imposing a surcharge for checked bags.
[snip]
Last edited by Prospero; Aug 19, 2016 at 3:55 pm Reason: In respect to Rule 9 - fair usage of copyrighted material
#9
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 351
Reality is that customer satisfaction will take a back seat to the bottom line and market share goals that BA/IAG have. Many here will not like it and a few will vote with their wallet and not purchase BA fares when they have a choice but for many customers they put up with the Easyjets and Ryanairs of the world and price is often the key decision for many when choosing the ticket. The issue I see is that BA is rarely the cheapest and as pointed out they are still trying to market themselves as a full service airline. IMO they need to decide whether they are a full service airline or a low cost carrier it's very difficult for any business to be in the middle ground you end up not being competitive at the high or low end.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,531
#12
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Programs: BAEC GCH, CXMP Gold, Amex Plat, HH Gold, Accor Plat, SPG Gold, Carlson Gold
Posts: 1,106
Interesting. Surely someone at BA must take note of this?
When FT complains, no one cares as quite frankly we're a small and hard to please set of people, the The Economist is a major publication...
When FT complains, no one cares as quite frankly we're a small and hard to please set of people, the The Economist is a major publication...
#13
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Marriott Bonvoy
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Englandshire
Programs: SPG LT Plat, BA G, BD*LG, MG Blue+ ...
Posts: 16,032
Originally Posted by The Economist
according to Head for Points, the travel blog that first leaked the story