Community
Wiki Posts
Search

30+ people offloaded from LAX-LHR flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2015, 4:27 pm
  #151  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,624
Originally Posted by 110pgl
Why would BA pay at the EC261 rate? It was AA's fault they misconnected.
Your point?

The post I replied to stated "My goodness! That's rather stingy meal allowances provided by AA"

There is a lot less protection in the US vs what BA is obligated to do. If AA can get away with paying less, not surprised it does
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 4:28 pm
  #152  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: UK
Programs: I go wherever the content takes me.
Posts: 5,698
Originally Posted by 110pgl


Why would BA pay at the EC261 rate? It was AA's fault they misconnected.
You need to familiarise yourself with the legislation. The obligation to pay compensation and the obligation to cover necessary care expenses during the delay are completely different from one another. It does not need to be BA's fault to pay for food, a phone call, hotels, and so on.
paul4040 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 4:31 pm
  #153  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Global
Posts: 5,998
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
Your point?

The post I replied to stated "My goodness! That's rather stingy meal allowances provided by AA"

There is a lot less protection in the US vs what BA is obligated to do. If AA can get away with paying less, not surprised it does
You replied..."BA has to comply with EC261 however"

I was asking why BA would need to comply with EC261. If BA contributes anything (via a joint agreement), I would think EC261 would not apply because the delay was with AA.

It really is a question, not an accusation... why would BA be obligated to do anything (outside a private joint agreement)?
Global321 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 5:41 pm
  #154  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,624
Originally Posted by 110pgl
You replied..."BA has to comply with EC261 however"

I was asking why BA would need to comply with EC261. If BA contributes anything (via a joint agreement), I would think EC261 would not apply because the delay was with AA.

It really is a question, not an accusation... why would BA be obligated to do anything (outside a private joint agreement)?
Just read the post I was replying to and it should be clear that the poster was commenting on the level of the AA allowance and what BA would provide in an equivalent situation

Where BA is liable in the US, EC261 will apply
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 6:40 pm
  #155  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Global
Posts: 5,998
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
Just read the post I was replying to and it should be clear that the poster was commenting on the level of the AA allowance and what BA would provide in an equivalent situation

Where BA is liable in the US, EC261 will apply
Okay... Not relevant here, but, okay.
Global321 is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2015, 8:55 am
  #156  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
Originally Posted by 110pgl
Why would BA pay at the EC261 rate? It was AA's fault they misconnected.
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
BA has to comply with EC261 however
As the feeder flight was not touching the EU and was operated by a non-community carrier, AA is definitely not affected by EC 261. And for those who missed the connection, BA may also not be - after all they did not deny those people boarding. If they provide some meal and hotel vouchers, it will be very hard to get additional compensation.
weero is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.