BA from BHX?
#31
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Blue
Posts: 32
Must have been 1994/1995, I remember flying in a 757 from BHX to YYZ via JFK. My dad knew someone in BA Ops so we had a op-up to Business (back then it was cradle seats) and seats in the cockpit for landing at both JFK and YYZ. Those were the days...
Robin
Robin
#32
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ireland/UK
Programs: HH Diamond, IHG PlatAmb, BA ,
Posts: 873
BA at BHX used to work in the days when there were few direct flights from the more `remote' airports (EDI, GLA, BFS) to Europe. Then it made sense to hub through either BHX or MAN allowing for regular flights (With a morning and evening peak). Unfortunately with LCC offering direct flights the need for these secondary hubs went. This was very unfortunate as they did offer the chance of day trips to Europe. 7 a.m. flight to BHX change planes and 9 a.m.flight to Europe arrive for lunch and afternoon meeting. Reverse at 6 p.m..
Given the small size of BHX and MAN it was much easier to change planes than at LHR. With direct flights by LCC from the more `remote' airports there was just not the demand to keep the number of flights from BHX and MAN needed to work a hub model.
Joke at least for Northern Ireland was that the LCC direct flights were so few that most trips to Europe meant at least one if not two nights away even for a short meeting.
Using LHR as a hub is very time consuming
Given the small size of BHX and MAN it was much easier to change planes than at LHR. With direct flights by LCC from the more `remote' airports there was just not the demand to keep the number of flights from BHX and MAN needed to work a hub model.
Joke at least for Northern Ireland was that the LCC direct flights were so few that most trips to Europe meant at least one if not two nights away even for a short meeting.
Using LHR as a hub is very time consuming
#33
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver, I'm back!
Posts: 657
Maybe a bit OT but the mention of BHX brought back some memories
#34
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 870
Good information here guys. I do think that BA is aiming itself towards the LCC base, it has been said that HBOs are aimed to show a headline fare, isn't that exactly what the LCCs are doing anyway?>
Obviosuly BA is a business but the other carriers must be making profit for BHX to seemingly expand year after year.
I understand that proximity to LHR is a problem but what about direct flight rather than as a hub to LHR?
Also I cant see how southerners don't see LHR as a nightmare to get to! Suppose none of them have ever come through BHX with its excellent train service.
Obviosuly BA is a business but the other carriers must be making profit for BHX to seemingly expand year after year.
I understand that proximity to LHR is a problem but what about direct flight rather than as a hub to LHR?
Also I cant see how southerners don't see LHR as a nightmare to get to! Suppose none of them have ever come through BHX with its excellent train service.
#35
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 22
BA from BHX?
Many memories for me of both the Eurohub and also the direct flights from BHX - ORD (on AA) which were stopped after 9/11 (I flew back to the UK in the 18th Sept and had to fly BA up to GLA to connect on the 25th as the flight was cancelled and never reinstated). I remember talking with the taxi drivers about how that 1 flight cancellation had hit their business...
Nov 2010 BHX was full of BA planes due to weather diversions. Was great to see them lined up....
Would love a direct flight to the States from here (on BA or AA)....
Nov 2010 BHX was full of BA planes due to weather diversions. Was great to see them lined up....
Would love a direct flight to the States from here (on BA or AA)....
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
BA really doesn't know how to do direct flights between non-hub airports. They have proved it again and again. If I were an investor I would be very nervous to hear them talking about it. They are doing well with their hub-and-spoke strategy. They have some challenges coming up with low cost longhaul competitors and that is where their attention should be.
It's very easy, you get in the taxi and say "Heathrow terminal 5 please"
#37
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold & GGL & CCR, HH Diam, Bonvoy Titanium, IHG Spire, Tastecard
Posts: 7,549
If BA wanted to start more regional flights, I'd vote for an early morning/late evening BRU flight from MAN
BA404/389 night stops in BRU, landing at 2205 and leaving 0645. A 2300 flight from BRU, arriving at MAN at 2330, then a 0430 from flight MAN arriving BRU at 0600 would be handy. (OK, ideally that 0430 flight would be 0600). Every time I've flown SN has been full, and the fares are pretty high compared with say LHR-BRU (which has to compete with SN AND .
BA404/389 night stops in BRU, landing at 2205 and leaving 0645. A 2300 flight from BRU, arriving at MAN at 2330, then a 0430 from flight MAN arriving BRU at 0600 would be handy. (OK, ideally that 0430 flight would be 0600). Every time I've flown SN has been full, and the fares are pretty high compared with say LHR-BRU (which has to compete with SN AND .
#38
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: EBD, BAEC GGL/CCR, Alitalia AlataPlus, Club Carlson Gold, SPG Plat100, HHD
Posts: 654
Interesting discussion...
I had to get to BHX two weeks ago and immediately thought of booking with BA as that is carrier of choice to the UK, but to my surprise found that the only sensible way of getting to BHX in *A or OW would be SAS via Copenhagen. (Or LH group via LH hub)
It is a nightmare trying to get LHR-Birmingham or MAN-Birmingham when I have a 2.5 hr flight from LHR that I am intending to do over the day.
I had to get to BHX two weeks ago and immediately thought of booking with BA as that is carrier of choice to the UK, but to my surprise found that the only sensible way of getting to BHX in *A or OW would be SAS via Copenhagen. (Or LH group via LH hub)
It is a nightmare trying to get LHR-Birmingham or MAN-Birmingham when I have a 2.5 hr flight from LHR that I am intending to do over the day.
#39
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,839
#40
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,839
Slightly OT but I don't get BA and BRU. The last flight back from BRU is at someing like 7.30pm which is earlier than the last Eurostar and just ridiculous. There must be plenty of demand for a later flight back to London - I can't be the only one who'd prefer to fly than to train it.
I would imagine there's little demand for a later flight from point-to-point outside of a west London/Thames Valley. City centre-city centre flying is 90mins+longer and a lot more painful. I don't know anyone London based (who doesn't live near Heathrow) who flies to CDG or BRU.
#41
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 870
But also the LCCs are aiming upwards towards the "premium" passengers who value a nicer experience. It looks to me like there will be a convergence in the middle at some point in the next decade or two.
What's the business case for that? I mean, except that you would like a direct flight from BHX to your usual business trip destinations with BA branding on the side.
BA really doesn't know how to do direct flights between non-hub airports. They have proved it again and again. If I were an investor I would be very nervous to hear them talking about it. They are doing well with their hub-and-spoke strategy. They have some challenges coming up with low cost longhaul competitors and that is where their attention should be.
It's very easy, you get in the taxi and say "Heathrow terminal 5 please"
What's the business case for that? I mean, except that you would like a direct flight from BHX to your usual business trip destinations with BA branding on the side.
BA really doesn't know how to do direct flights between non-hub airports. They have proved it again and again. If I were an investor I would be very nervous to hear them talking about it. They are doing well with their hub-and-spoke strategy. They have some challenges coming up with low cost longhaul competitors and that is where their attention should be.
It's very easy, you get in the taxi and say "Heathrow terminal 5 please"
No I just see that there is expansion year after year with international destinations being added. And very selfishly I want to add tier points and avios to my balance.
I guesstimate that it is around half LCC half flag carriers with many of hem direct destinations.
You can fly direct from BHX to US.
In terms of getting their. It is so much of a hassle. I have used taxis but the most cost efficient and time efficient way seems to actually be the national express coach. Still can't believe there is no direct train link via west coast main Line.
#42
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Programs: BA Gold, IC Ambassador, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Fairmont Platinum
Posts: 3,166
That should be a good business reason in itself! Lol
No I just see that there is expansion year after year with international destinations being added. And very selfishly I want to add tier points and avios to my balance.
I guesstimate that it is around half LCC half flag carriers with many of hem direct destinations.
You can fly direct from BHX to US.
In terms of getting their. It is so much of a hassle. I have used taxis but the most cost efficient and time efficient way seems to actually be the national express coach. Still can't believe there is no direct train link via west coast main Line.
No I just see that there is expansion year after year with international destinations being added. And very selfishly I want to add tier points and avios to my balance.
I guesstimate that it is around half LCC half flag carriers with many of hem direct destinations.
You can fly direct from BHX to US.
In terms of getting their. It is so much of a hassle. I have used taxis but the most cost efficient and time efficient way seems to actually be the national express coach. Still can't believe there is no direct train link via west coast main Line.
#43
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomsbury
Programs: BA Silver, AF Ivory
Posts: 2,202
I would imagine there's little demand for a later flight from point-to-point outside of a west London/Thames Valley. City centre-city centre flying is 90mins+longer and a lot more painful. I don't know anyone London based (who doesn't live near Heathrow) who flies to CDG or BRU.
I fly to CDG and ORY from LHR and use the eurostar (every other w-end in theory) - keeps the TPs topped up and I like the change!
#44
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MAN/BHX
Programs: ABBA
Posts: 6,027
Your profile says you live in West London. It's far easier to get to Heathrow (even T5) from Southall or Ealing than it is to get to St Pancras. "Check in" times for eurostar are 5 minute less than T5, so no real bonus there. Eurostar insists on going through pointless security, so no bonus there.
#45
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,839