Disappointing BA Award Avail plus Appalling Fees!
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DCA
Programs: AMC MovieWatcher, Giant BonusCard, Petco PALS Card, Silver Diner Blue Plate Club
Posts: 22,297
Re the OP's comment about 'tricking' the website, being pushed onto BA flights when BA has something available, and then the website returning errors... you've found flights that are available, why not ring up BA and specifically ask the telephone agents to book them?
#32
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA
Posts: 2,368
It seems that the BA Gold card holder of many years has just cottoned onto the fact that pass on all taxes and surcharges to the consumer. Not unlike the hoard of BA/Chase card holders over the last 6 months.
#33
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
I couldn't agree more about not wanting to fly US airlines which as a rule are obviously horrendous.
But suck it up there fellows, we're going to keep complaining. You should try it yourself instead of just suffering quietly and majestically under the "stiff upper lip why that's just the way it is and it's barbaric to bring it up in civilized company".
#34
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,660
- Yes Yes Yes I DO usually redeem in CW. In fact I started the entire search LOOKING FOR CW, and NO CW seats were very defintely available in many places, so the "well if he only flew in the front I'm SURE he'd have found seats" are WRONG.
Thanks again to the sympathetic friendly folks. Appreciated.
There is a horrendously misleading functionality in the BA.com interface that will attempt to offer you WT redemption seats for CW mileage levels on the date you request, rather than searching for F/CW/WT+ seats on alternate dates. It also bears noting that it will offer you these WT seats instead of offering for you to search partners (IB, AA, etc.)
As a Gold, if I want to find out which dates have F/CW/WT+ redemption seats available, I have to log in using other family members' accounts (Silver or Blue), so that I can request a search for alternate dates and/or partners rather than have BA.com "helpfully" offer seats in Y for 2 x Y redemption rates.
I strongly suspect that this is what's happening to you, boslhrzrhpvg, from what you wrote in your earlier post.
I will also remark that I find the signal to noise ratio in this thread rather disappointing - why is it that every thread posted by someone who may only have been buying BA flights in the last years, and not have had time to learn the absurdities of BA.com's ridiculously poor redemption interface as they haven't yet attempted to redeem any miles, gets subjected to a brigade of unhelpful posters who essentially say that if they're having trouble redeeming their BAEC miles, it's their own fault for having shown any loyalty to BA in the first place...
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DCA
Programs: AMC MovieWatcher, Giant BonusCard, Petco PALS Card, Silver Diner Blue Plate Club
Posts: 22,297
ANd if we're talking about UK to North America, don't EVER rely on BA.com, you always have an option of catching one of the available BA flights and then taking a partner like AA or AS to your final destination.
Want to go LHR-LAX but it's not available? Consider:
LHR-SFO, SFO-LAX on AA
LHR-SEA, SEA-:AX on AS
LHR-IAH, IAH-LAX on AA (IAH is almost always available in J/F)
LHR-DFW, DFW-LAX on AA
LHR-DEN, DEN-LAX on AA
LHR-JFK, JFK-LAX on AA
LHR-EWR, EWR-LAX on AA
LHR-ORD, ORD-LAX on AA
Then there's IAD, MIA, BOS...
Of course BA.com won't give you these.
Want to go LHR-LAX but it's not available? Consider:
LHR-SFO, SFO-LAX on AA
LHR-SEA, SEA-:AX on AS
LHR-IAH, IAH-LAX on AA (IAH is almost always available in J/F)
LHR-DFW, DFW-LAX on AA
LHR-DEN, DEN-LAX on AA
LHR-JFK, JFK-LAX on AA
LHR-EWR, EWR-LAX on AA
LHR-ORD, ORD-LAX on AA
Then there's IAD, MIA, BOS...
Of course BA.com won't give you these.
#36
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by boslhrzrhpvg
my plan had been to jump on the phone (yes extra fee although not sure if they waive that for Gold EC?) and request availability on specific CX flight numbers from an EC agent
#37
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
Again I said as below. You seem intent on finding fault regardless of what I actually say.
Originally Posted by boslhrzrhpvg
Yes I am MAINLY frustrated by the fees so the friendly posters who identified that are 100% correct.
#38
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
I will also remark that I find the signal to noise ratio in this thread rather disappointing - why is it that every thread posted by someone who may only have been buying BA flights in the last years, and not have had time to learn the absurdities of BA.com's ridiculously poor redemption interface as they haven't yet attempted to redeem any miles, gets subjected to a brigade of unhelpful posters who essentially say that if they're having trouble redeeming their BAEC miles, it's their own fault for having shown any loyalty to BA in the first place...
Considering he got his miles for nothing the least he can do is shell out for the taxes/charges for a redemption.
#40
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DCA
Programs: AMC MovieWatcher, Giant BonusCard, Petco PALS Card, Silver Diner Blue Plate Club
Posts: 22,297
In response to my posts in this thread, really?
My original post #5 in the thread was, I thought, a helpful response to folks generally about BA overall availability and fees, what they're good at and what they're not. Hardly a defense or apologia, and intended to be useful. Some members thought it was.
And you say your intent was to jump on the phone before giving up on BA due to the fees, but then I'm confused about the availability complaints when you say you found availability but didn't call. And as I observed earlier, with CX you wouldn't have paid the same fees anyway.
My posts here have meant to be as helpful and constructive as possible, offering first perspective and then solutions (call when the website doesn't work, alternate routings, alternate carriers with lower fees). No argument, no attitude, please don't offer any back.
My original post #5 in the thread was, I thought, a helpful response to folks generally about BA overall availability and fees, what they're good at and what they're not. Hardly a defense or apologia, and intended to be useful. Some members thought it was.
And you say your intent was to jump on the phone before giving up on BA due to the fees, but then I'm confused about the availability complaints when you say you found availability but didn't call. And as I observed earlier, with CX you wouldn't have paid the same fees anyway.
My posts here have meant to be as helpful and constructive as possible, offering first perspective and then solutions (call when the website doesn't work, alternate routings, alternate carriers with lower fees). No argument, no attitude, please don't offer any back.
#41
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
A question for you... when you say that no CW seats were available, did BA.com allow you to check a range of dates, or did it immediately propose WT on the date you requested instead? I notice in your first post, that you saw a message at times about "additional seats" being made available to you as a Gold...
There is a horrendously misleading functionality in the BA.com interface that will attempt to offer you WT redemption seats for CW mileage levels on the date you request, rather than searching for F/CW/WT+ seats on alternate dates. It also bears noting that it will offer you these WT seats instead of offering for you to search partners (IB, AA, etc.)
As a Gold, if I want to find out which dates have F/CW/WT+ redemption seats available, I have to log in using other family members' accounts (Silver or Blue), so that I can request a search for alternate dates and/or partners rather than have BA.com "helpfully" offer seats in Y for 2 x Y redemption rates.
I strongly suspect that this is what's happening to you, boslhrzrhpvg, from what you wrote in your earlier post.
There is a horrendously misleading functionality in the BA.com interface that will attempt to offer you WT redemption seats for CW mileage levels on the date you request, rather than searching for F/CW/WT+ seats on alternate dates. It also bears noting that it will offer you these WT seats instead of offering for you to search partners (IB, AA, etc.)
As a Gold, if I want to find out which dates have F/CW/WT+ redemption seats available, I have to log in using other family members' accounts (Silver or Blue), so that I can request a search for alternate dates and/or partners rather than have BA.com "helpfully" offer seats in Y for 2 x Y redemption rates.
I strongly suspect that this is what's happening to you, boslhrzrhpvg, from what you wrote in your earlier post.
The other thing about the interface (and not sure if a browser thing is going on here - I use Chrome) is the degree of having to back up and re-enter everything from scratch. Maybe theres something I'm missing or it works better w/ IE, I didn't get to comparing that.
I will also remark that I find the signal to noise ratio in this thread rather disappointing - why is it that every thread posted by someone who may only have been buying BA flights in the last years, and not have had time to learn the absurdities of BA.com's ridiculously poor redemption interface as they haven't yet attempted to redeem any miles, gets subjected to a brigade of unhelpful posters who essentially say that if they're having trouble redeeming their BAEC miles, it's their own fault for having shown any loyalty to BA in the first place...
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DCA
Programs: AMC MovieWatcher, Giant BonusCard, Petco PALS Card, Silver Diner Blue Plate Club
Posts: 22,297
Is it possible that some of the posts weren't saying 'shut up' by pointing out that these are known problems/issues/concerns, but rather remarking that given they're known problems/issues/concerns there are also known approaches and workarounds as well, here's what they are, in other words maybe not sypathizing with you but rather trying to be constructive to help?
#44
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,660
The other thing about the interface (and not sure if a browser thing is going on here - I use Chrome) is the degree of having to back up and re-enter everything from scratch. Maybe theres something I'm missing or it works better w/ IE, I didn't get to comparing that.
Most important, though, is that it is basically impossible as a Gold to search for premium cabins on alternate dates or partners if there is "V" availability in WT, as BA.com will offer you those seats for double the normal mileage (along with the cheerful message you put in your very first post) instead of doing what it would do for any non-Gold, which is take you to a calendar with alternate dates, or ask if you'd like to search partners who operate that route.
There was another thread a month or two back about this - started by henkybaby, I think.
I strongly suspect that if you can search alternate dates, you'll find something in F or CW that suits you, and the fuel surcharges then, although still a bit steep, are not that much in relation to the overall value of the product you're receiving.
As others have said, partner travel can also be a good option, and may dodge the fuel surcharges if flying certain partners.
#45
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
Best to probably close this thread. Maybe I should stay a lurker.