Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Asiana | Asiana Club
Reload this Page >

Asiana Business vs Air China Business

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Asiana Business vs Air China Business

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2016, 11:26 am
  #1  
Used to be garyjr316
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: LAX or SBA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, Gold Passport, Hilton HHonors, Marriott
Posts: 800
Asiana Business vs Air China Business

My wife and I have the option of flying either Asiana A380 business class overnight or a Air China 777-300 business class overnight. Curious what most people would suggest is better? I will have already flown the Asiana A380 once but I always like to try new products IF they are worth it. Would Air China be a total downgrade in terms of comfort and service?
Dad to GO is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2016, 12:11 pm
  #2  
TPJ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,884
You must be joking...

CA has 2-2-2 config and the same seats pmCO (still) has.

OZ seats are so MUCH better.

If you have young F/A's CA can offer good service. But you may end up with F/A's who remember Ilushin IL62 days and service would then be mediocre.

Yes - you will survive a CA flight (and you MIGHT get fairly acceptable service) but you cannot compare these 2 airlines.
TPJ is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2016, 11:46 am
  #3  
Used to be garyjr316
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: LAX or SBA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, Gold Passport, Hilton HHonors, Marriott
Posts: 800
Thanks... guess we'll stick with Asiana then! :-)
Dad to GO is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2016, 12:44 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: Hyatt Diamond,IHG Platinum, HH Gold, OZ Diamond (*G), AA Plat, AS MVP Gold
Posts: 85
Originally Posted by Dad to GO
Thanks... guess we'll stick with Asiana then! :-)
All the way to Asiana in this case, hard and soft products unless you would like to do some adventure
andante81 is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2016, 3:11 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAH
Programs: Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist, DL Plat, UA Silver
Posts: 4,043
OZ has an much better product, both have bad catering, both have decent service in the air. Both are horrible when it comes to IRROPS.
TennisNoob is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2016, 11:51 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EWR, PHL
Programs: UA1k 3MM, AA Plt, peasant on everybody else, elite something or other at a bunch of hotels.
Posts: 4,637
I'm trying really hard to think of something - anything - where CA is better than than OZ and I'm coming up with a blank.

Maybe it depends on your route and/or price. But even then, I'm not certain I'd take CA unless there was a very substantial advantage to doing so.
1kBill is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2016, 5:05 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seoul
Programs: OZ Diamond, UA, AF
Posts: 510
I've flown CA on 2 round trips and both times I saw horrible service, long delays and unruly, loud and very messy passengers. Granted, those flights were all in Y, but the difference to even UA Y, let alone SQ, NH, OZ, etc. was so stark that I've made a point never to fly them again if I have any other option.
jon503 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.