Connection time at PVG
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP/4MM, UA GS, AS MVP GOLD 75K
Posts: 3,362
Connection time at PVG
I am traveling ORD-PVG on AA in a few weeks and am about to book a connection to PEK, but want to know if the connection time is enough.
I am flying J on AA289 that arrives PVG at 2:15pm. I am looking to book a ticket that departs PVG-PEK at 4:00pm on China Eastern. I have no checked luggage and a regular tourist single-entry visa.
Is the 105 minute connection time enough?
I am flying J on AA289 that arrives PVG at 2:15pm. I am looking to book a ticket that departs PVG-PEK at 4:00pm on China Eastern. I have no checked luggage and a regular tourist single-entry visa.
Is the 105 minute connection time enough?
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,256
Originally Posted by olimaspecto
I am traveling ORD-PVG on AA in a few weeks and am about to book a connection to PEK, but want to know if the connection time is enough.
I am flying J on AA289 that arrives PVG at 2:15pm. I am looking to book a ticket that departs PVG-PEK at 4:00pm on China Eastern. I have no checked luggage and a regular tourist single-entry visa.
Is the 105 minute connection time enough?
I am flying J on AA289 that arrives PVG at 2:15pm. I am looking to book a ticket that departs PVG-PEK at 4:00pm on China Eastern. I have no checked luggage and a regular tourist single-entry visa.
Is the 105 minute connection time enough?
#3
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Asia/Europe
Programs: CX, OZ, MU (+AY, DL), Shangri-La, Hilton
Posts: 7,236
I think in general transiting in Japan or Korea is preferable if coming from the US. As far as I know the only aiports in China with a designated transit area are Guangzhou and Hongkong. ICN, KIX or NGO mean a lot less hassle than PVG.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP/4MM, UA GS, AS MVP GOLD 75K
Posts: 3,362
Originally Posted by mosburger
I think in general transiting in Japan or Korea is preferable if coming from the US. As far as I know the only aiports in China with a designated transit area are Guangzhou and Hongkong. ICN, KIX or NGO mean a lot less hassle than PVG.
#5
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,256
Originally Posted by mosburger
I think in general transiting in Japan or Korea is preferable if coming from the US. As far as I know the only aiports in China with a designated transit area are Guangzhou and Hongkong. ICN, KIX or NGO mean a lot less hassle than PVG.
oh, and before closing, i want to chime in on guangzhou. i've transited there 4 times now and pvg works much, much better (can's 3 hour minimum connect time for dom-->int is not a misprint).