Bhutan questions
#1
Original Poster


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 229
Bhutan questions
We are considering a September 2015 Bhutan trip. We are planning to stop for about 5 days in either India or Thailand depending on which way we fly and then spend about 7-9 days in Bhutan, probably at the Como properties.
I have a few questions:
1) Como offers several packages combining their properties, full board, transport and other extras. It seems like a good idea-is this the way to go or is a la carte better?
2) Is their any advantage to coming in through India over Thailand or vice versa?
3) We have traveled in Thailand a fair amount so planning that would be easy, but have not been to India. I assume Dehli would be the best entry point. Any suggestions for a short itinerary in the Dehli area?
Thanks!
I have a few questions:
1) Como offers several packages combining their properties, full board, transport and other extras. It seems like a good idea-is this the way to go or is a la carte better?
2) Is their any advantage to coming in through India over Thailand or vice versa?
3) We have traveled in Thailand a fair amount so planning that would be easy, but have not been to India. I assume Dehli would be the best entry point. Any suggestions for a short itinerary in the Dehli area?
Thanks!
#2
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Singapore
Programs: IHG Rewards Club - Platinum
Posts: 60
1. There is no real ala carte option in Bhutan. You can only go with a travel agency and pay the daily tariff which everyone else does. If you're going with Como, you'll be paying a higher daily tariff as their hotels are considered upmarket (the standard daily tariff gives you full board, transport and lodging as well but the lodging is 3 star quality).
2. The only advantage I can think of is shorter flight time. But do take note you will need a visa in India, unless you're from Philippines, Japan, Singapore, New Zealand, etc (US Americans not included) which will qualify you for a visa on arrival. Thailand doesn't require visa for most nationalities.
3. Delhi is a great place if you're interested in historical stuff. I spent 2 days in Delhi and wrote about it here. You can follow the same sequence I did: http://iwandered.net/2012/03/03/delhi/
2. The only advantage I can think of is shorter flight time. But do take note you will need a visa in India, unless you're from Philippines, Japan, Singapore, New Zealand, etc (US Americans not included) which will qualify you for a visa on arrival. Thailand doesn't require visa for most nationalities.
3. Delhi is a great place if you're interested in historical stuff. I spent 2 days in Delhi and wrote about it here. You can follow the same sequence I did: http://iwandered.net/2012/03/03/delhi/
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 18,329
As others have said, you really don't have the option of a la carte travel, unless you can get an invitation from an NGO (or, more likely, an expat working for an NGO), or you have a Bhutanese contact who can invite you to visit.
The main advantage to entering via India is cheaper access: you can even do it overland.
The main advantage to entering via India is cheaper access: you can even do it overland.

