Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

AA 787 Dreamliner NOT affected by new FAA range restrictions

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA 787 Dreamliner NOT affected by new FAA range restrictions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2018, 8:55 am
  #1  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
AA 787 Dreamliner NOT affected by new FAA range restrictions

As reported in many media (including FlyerTalk), the FAA has issued an Airworthiness Directive (AD note) restricting Boeing 787 Dreamliner equipped with the Rolls Royce Trent 1000 engines to ETOPS (Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards) 140 due to engine reliability problems.

This means RR-equipped Dreamliner can not be over 140 minutes / 2:20 hours from potential diversion airports at any time flying overwater sectors (to protect the aircraft if restricted to flying on a single engine due to engine failure). AA chose the GEnx 1B engines for its Dreamliner; GE engines are not affected by the FAA AD note. GEnx powered 787s were awarded ETOPS 330 (5:30 hours) certification (properly equipped and maintained); that range covers approximately 97% of the Earth’s surface.

You can see ETOPS and effects on routes by using Great Circle Mapper here and entering the closes ETOPS limits, 138 or 330.

AA planned operations with the 787-8 and 787-9 aircraft have not been affected by the FAA AD note.

FT TalkMail: According to ch-aviation, the most recent restrictions will affect nearly a dozen carriers including British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, Norwegian, LATAM, Thai Airways, Avianca, Air New Zealand, Air Europa, LOT, Ethiopian, Royal Brunei and Scoot. In August of 2016, All Nippon Airways announced it would replace the Rolls Royce engines on all 50 of the Dreamliners in its fleet citing “multiple engine problems” eerily similar to those described in the latest AD.
(AA partners in bold.)

The sample ETOPS routing and information is Frim Grest Circle Mapper.
Attached Images  
econometrics and aztimm like this.

Last edited by JDiver; May 10, 2018 at 8:14 pm Reason: Credit Wikimedia, add GCM instead of previous illustration
JDiver is offline  
Old May 10, 2018, 10:07 am
  #2  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NYC
Programs: AA 2MM, Bonvoy LTT, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,638
I think credit should be given to source of ETOPS image.

As far as I can tell, the image is based off of
Lessons Learned
seawolf is offline  
Old May 10, 2018, 10:10 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,107
I’m wondering if this shouldn’t be a one and done, closed sticky for a bit.
thunderlounge is offline  
Old May 10, 2018, 10:31 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,159
Originally Posted by seawolf
I think credit should be given to source of ETOPS image.

As far as I can tell, the image is based off of
Lessons Learned
It appears to be from here, which acknowledges that FAA site. It should be noted for clarity that the "rated time" referenced in the image is the non-ETOPS-rated time.
seawolf likes this.
FlyingEgghead is offline  
Old May 10, 2018, 10:32 am
  #5  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Originally Posted by seawolf
I think credit should be given to source of ETOPS image.

As far as I can tell, the image is based off of
Lessons Learned
Incorrect source listing; the source is Wikimedia; it is open source.

The information was preemptively posted here because many members are likely to be unaware of the differences in the RR and GE powered Dreamliners, and given both the FAA AD note publicity and the AA fleet plan, which is heavily reliant on 787 types going forward, may be potential (unjustified, in this instance) cause for concern to at least some AA flyers.

I have scheduled a future BA 789 AAdvantage award flight myself, for example. Those using TN to fly LAX-PPT could be affected, depending on which engine TN has selected for its 787-9 operations, scheduled to begin LAX-PPT 8 November 2018. Easily doable with ETOPS 330, not possible with ETOPS 140 restrictions.

The issue will undoubtedly be used by GE powered 787 operating Airlines to their commercial advantage.
E55 likes this.
JDiver is offline  
Old May 10, 2018, 10:41 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Cool drawing!
LondonElite is offline  
Old May 10, 2018, 5:03 pm
  #7  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NYC
Programs: AA 2MM, Bonvoy LTT, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,638
Originally Posted by FlyingEgghead
It appears to be from here, which acknowledges that FAA site. It should be noted for clarity that the "rated time" referenced in the image is the non-ETOPS-rated time.
Originally Posted by JDiver
Incorrect source listing; the source is Wikimedia; it is open source.
As FlyingEgghead indicated, the "owner" Vladsinger on wikimedia "adapted" by replacing "60 minutes" with "rated time." Everything else is the same down to the angles of the blue dotted line (flight path).

However the problem, as FlyingEgghead also pointed out, is that the diagram is actually mislabeled. If R is the "Distance traveled in rated time with one engine operative" in the context of the ETOPS wiki article, that would make R the ETOPS rated distance. This would then make the blue dotted the line ETOPS "legal" flight path as aircraft has to stay within flying distance of those diversion points. That would make the green line an illegal flight path.

Imagine if one of the questions on the ATP license exam is to draw a diagram explaining ETOPS and that is Vladsinger's answer. Would you want Vladsinger to be your pilot on a oceanic flight? Vladsinger's flight announcement would be "Ladies and Gentlemen, while the flight computer is suggesting a flight time of 15 hours from LAX to SYD, I know a shortcut that will get us there in 12."

Last edited by seawolf; May 10, 2018 at 7:57 pm
seawolf is offline  
Old May 10, 2018, 7:17 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,008
I suggest just deleting that diagram.

The link to ETOPS maps on GCM is http://www.gcmap.com/mapui (or am I the only one getting a 404 with the link in the original post?)

Last edited by CPRich; May 10, 2018 at 7:23 pm
CPRich is offline  
Old May 10, 2018, 8:15 pm
  #9  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Thank you all. I’ve replaced the ETOPS illustration with one from Great Circle Mapper and repaired the GC Mapper URL link.

If LATAM abides by the FAA AD, no more 787-9 SCL-AKL with their original routing until the AD is addressed satisfactorily by Rolls Royce and withdrawn by the FAA.
E55 likes this.
JDiver is offline  
Old May 11, 2018, 8:50 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MSY
Programs: AA Plat Pro, UA Plat, VS Silver, Marriott Titanium, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 2,531
Originally Posted by JDiver
I have scheduled a future BA 789 AAdvantage award flight myself, for example. Those using TN to fly LAX-PPT could be affected, depending on which engine TN has selected for its 787-9 operations, scheduled to begin LAX-PPT 8 November 2018. Easily doable with ETOPS 330, not possible with ETOPS 140 restrictions.
BA has filed paperwork with the UK CAA seeking approval to wet lease QR A330s to help make up for long haul lift.

LATAM is wet leasing four A330s from Spanish airline Wamos to operate the JFK-GYE, MAD-GYE, LIM-JFK and SCL-BOG routes, and reportedly have also leased a Wamos 747-400 for SCL-LIM-LAX flights (not announced yet). LATAM Brasil is transferring 4 77Ws and LATAM Argentina 2 A320s to LATAM Chile to make up for lost lift.

No word on SCL-AKL but apparently the 787-800 operating that route doesn't have Block C engines and therefore isn't subject to the ETOPS restriction. (Despite that, NZ has switched to the ETOPS-330 77E on AKL-EZE for the time being.)
JDiver likes this.
oopsz is offline  
Old May 11, 2018, 3:14 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP, SPG Plat
Posts: 40
Originally Posted by oopsz
BA has filed paperwork with the UK CAA seeking approval to wet lease QR A330s to help make up for long haul lift.

LATAM is wet leasing four A330s from Spanish airline Wamos to operate the JFK-GYE, MAD-GYE, LIM-JFK and SCL-BOG routes, and reportedly have also leased a Wamos 747-400 for SCL-LIM-LAX flights (not announced yet). LATAM Brasil is transferring 4 77Ws and LATAM Argentina 2 A320s to LATAM Chile to make up for lost lift.

No word on SCL-AKL but apparently the 787-800 operating that route doesn't have Block C engines and therefore isn't subject to the ETOPS restriction. (Despite that, NZ has switched to the ETOPS-330 77E on AKL-EZE for the time being.)
I saw the Wamos 747-400 parked yesterday at SCL as my IB flight was taxiing.
nelsinho is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.