I need your advice on how to deal with an awful flight experience
#46
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
#47
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 141
Totally off-topic, but shocked by this. Good for you.....my assumption is your knowledge of AA has something to do with your means of income generation or some familia relationship----so to not support AA is probably a bit stickier than for most.
~TG
~TG
#48
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Domestically, for paid flights, my family and I fly DL much more than AA and are very happy with them. So, in reality, not a recent development in any way. Just to give that perspective.
And, no, thank god, none of my income nor any family members' comes from employment at AA-- I'm successful . And, I can't think of a reason in the world that AA -deserves- my business or knee-jerk support, etc.
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,700
Really? And presumably Congress would also prohibit the airlines from charging more after removing seats to increase space? If not...I suspect you are NOT speaking for the majority of travellers! They want 1. Cheap. 2. Cheap 3. Cheap. They would not thank you for extra seat pitch or width if it cost them more! (as it quite fairly should)
And ...with the fascinating winter weather you have over there.... what... force airlines to accommodate everybody overnight no matter what the reason for the delay? Yep... that wouldn't increase their costs at all......
And ...with the fascinating winter weather you have over there.... what... force airlines to accommodate everybody overnight no matter what the reason for the delay? Yep... that wouldn't increase their costs at all......
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,700
#51
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: jfk area
Programs: AA platinum; 2MM AA, Delta Diamond, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,291
#52
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 302
As far as some of the other points raised by posters - I'd have happily pushed my mom around in a wheelchair, but you can't do that at airports.
ABQ would have been (and was) fine, but not at 2AM. Ever tried to get transportation to SAF at ABQ at 2AM?
I'm a bit surprised that some posters here think I should be happy that AA did what they were required to do by law and that I should jut forget about the third IDB and the other issues caused by AA's incompetence just because the compensation is a fair chunk of money.
One of the flight options that I was apparently offered (but didn't know about at the time) was a flight to Roswell - about 200 miles from my destination - I guess some posters here think that would have been OK too.
While compensation is important, it is equally important for AA to be held accountable for their actions - that employees are retrained and steps taken to preclude these problems in the future.
FWIW, neither DFW nor ABQ were particularly crowded the day of travel.
#53
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta Metro
Programs: DL , AC, BA, Hhonors Diamond, IH Platinum, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 2,354
We're happy that AA did what they were required to by law because normally you have to fight a LOT more to get them to concede that they DID break the law. There's a case in the UA forum of an attorney who had to take them to small claims court in Memphis. It took over a year.
Your best alternative is only to call or write customer service, and, while acknowledging that they had compensated you correctly for the IDBs, there were other service lapses outside of that that you really want to make them aware of. Be nice, not entitled. You might get some miles, you might not. Think of it as just venting.
You're very lucky to have gotten an immediate offer of cash.
Your best alternative is only to call or write customer service, and, while acknowledging that they had compensated you correctly for the IDBs, there were other service lapses outside of that that you really want to make them aware of. Be nice, not entitled. You might get some miles, you might not. Think of it as just venting.
You're very lucky to have gotten an immediate offer of cash.
#54
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 302
We're happy that AA did what they were required to by law because normally you have to fight a LOT more to get them to concede that they DID break the law. There's a case in the UA forum of an attorney who had to take them to small claims court in Memphis. It took over a year.
Your best alternative is only to call or write customer service, and, while acknowledging that they had compensated you correctly for the IDBs, there were other service lapses outside of that that you really want to make them aware of. Be nice, not entitled. You might get some miles, you might not. Think of it as just venting.
You're very lucky to have gotten an immediate offer of cash.
Your best alternative is only to call or write customer service, and, while acknowledging that they had compensated you correctly for the IDBs, there were other service lapses outside of that that you really want to make them aware of. Be nice, not entitled. You might get some miles, you might not. Think of it as just venting.
You're very lucky to have gotten an immediate offer of cash.
Cheers
#55
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 215
Most of us seem to be flabbergasted to death by the sum which appeared at the end of the OP's odyssey.
But... the sum of $875 just arose from multipling "the remaining flight coupons value" by EIGHT (2 IDB, each 400%).
Meaning: the coupons were merely ~$100
Would you believe your eyes and survive consecutive astonishment if AA HAD to multiply, say, $ 500?
But... the sum of $875 just arose from multipling "the remaining flight coupons value" by EIGHT (2 IDB, each 400%).
Meaning: the coupons were merely ~$100
Would you believe your eyes and survive consecutive astonishment if AA HAD to multiply, say, $ 500?
#56
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,857
We're happy that AA did what they were required to by law because normally you have to fight a LOT more to get them to concede that they DID break the law. There's a case in the UA forum of an attorney who had to take them to small claims court in Memphis. It took over a year.
Your best alternative is only to call or write customer service, and, while acknowledging that they had compensated you correctly for the IDBs, there were other service lapses outside of that that you really want to make them aware of. Be nice, not entitled. You might get some miles, you might not. Think of it as just venting.
You're very lucky to have gotten an immediate offer of cash.
Your best alternative is only to call or write customer service, and, while acknowledging that they had compensated you correctly for the IDBs, there were other service lapses outside of that that you really want to make them aware of. Be nice, not entitled. You might get some miles, you might not. Think of it as just venting.
You're very lucky to have gotten an immediate offer of cash.
Now if you mean you're working up the DOT chain, you may not have shot yourself in the foot very much.
Either way, I think your taking the money was a good call.
#57
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: BUR, LAX, PHX
Posts: 38
And you are certainly correct about the pacemaker - but - to offer a 92 year old woman who needs wheelchair assistance a flight from DFW to ABQ via Phoenix that arrives in ABQ at 2AM is a bit bizarre. How does one get to SAF from ABQ at 2AM. Then to do that twice in one trip is even more unbelievable.
#58
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Which I tend to -assume- actually is AA Customer Relations (and therefore email.) And I certainly agree that there's no further compensation likely forthcoming from them, if that's what's meant by "working the rest up the chain" etc.
#59
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 302
Most of us seem to be flabbergasted to death by the sum which appeared at the end of the OP's odyssey.
But... the sum of $875 just arose from multipling "the remaining flight coupons value" by EIGHT (2 IDB, each 400%).
Meaning: the coupons were merely ~$100
Would you believe your eyes and survive consecutive astonishment if AA HAD to multiply, say, $ 500?
But... the sum of $875 just arose from multipling "the remaining flight coupons value" by EIGHT (2 IDB, each 400%).
Meaning: the coupons were merely ~$100
Would you believe your eyes and survive consecutive astonishment if AA HAD to multiply, say, $ 500?
If the problem were a "normal" IDB (normally caused by overselling a flight) then this compensation would be correct. In this case, the IDB resulted from obvious incompetence on the part of AA which, in my opinion, combined with the third IDB, should clearly require more compensation.
I too, initially was blinded by the $ amount until I realized that it was merely what the law required them to pay.