![]() |
Originally Posted by george 3
(Post 24385666)
The analysts love to "add value" by making suggestions like this through research notes. Further, he will remain unaffected because his company's travel policy probably permits him F/J priveleges for which his liquid refreshements are comped. Let the low fare Euro-trash airlines charge their two Euros for the small bottle of water. Leave AA alone.
(I haven't flown any AA flights yet this year yet-only AF/UA/CX/PR/BA/TK so far...) |
Originally Posted by VegasGambler
(Post 24460811)
"Much less"? How much cheaper can they be? You can get short-haul flights in the US in the $40 to $70 range, including all taxes and fees. What are you paying in Europe for the equivalent of a SFO-LAX flight?
|
Originally Posted by AA_EXP09
(Post 24462634)
look at the equivalent fare and YQYR only when comparing-that is all the airline gets.
|
Originally Posted by VegasGambler
(Post 24460811)
"Much less"? How much cheaper can they be? You can get short-haul flights in the US in the $40 to $70 range, including all taxes and fees. What are you paying in Europe for the equivalent of a SFO-LAX flight?
Anyway the soda charge is stupid. What I can see happening is a reduction in offerings: say just coke and coke and pour from one litre bottles. |
Originally Posted by mre5765
(Post 24469460)
Before taxes, I once paid one euro for DUB/LCY one-way.
Anyway the soda charge is stupid. What I can see happening is a reduction in offerings: say just coke and coke and pour from one litre bottles. Wouldn't a more cost effective option be to use 2L bottles? :D |
Originally Posted by AA_EXP09
(Post 24472104)
That is only one option.
Wouldn't a more cost effective option be to use 2L bottles? :D |
Originally Posted by mre5765
(Post 24469460)
Before taxes, I once paid one euro for DUB/LCY one-way.
|
Originally Posted by relangford
(Post 24410012)
Weak analogy: theaters may just break even on admission charges; the money is made at the snack bar. Airlines make money on the fare. Unlike some here, I do not know about this analyst, but a statement like "makes my blood boil" makes him appear to be a jerk (or worse). And, there is the health issue: with reduced humidity aboard, passengers should drink liquids (especially water) to prevent dehydration. Charging for water COULD be considered a risk to health.
Charge $3 for soda if someone really can't go a couple hours without drinking carbonated crap instead of plain water. |
Originally Posted by vxmike
(Post 24492291)
Drink service should just be simplified overall. The airlines should bring around trays of complementary water every couple hours to avoid dehydration.
Charge $3 for soda if someone really can't go a couple hours without drinking carbonated crap instead of plain water. |
I think that everyone should be evaluated by the airline and labelled "happy drunk" or "mean drunk". Happy drunks should get free and frequent booze service.
|
Originally Posted by VegasGambler
(Post 24492722)
I think that everyone should be evaluated by the airline and labelled "happy drunk" or "mean drunk". Happy drunks should get free and frequent booze service.
|
Originally Posted by aamilesslave
(Post 24493566)
Works for me!!!
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.