![]() |
AA 'Evaluating' Long Range A321Neo
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...321neo-405630/
AA will evaluating the A321neoLR and hopefully, they will order it sometime in the future. This will be true 757 replacement. This will be on TATL missions & Hawaii flights, as well. Let the speculation begin. |
Personally, I will be a very happy narrowbody flyer the day both the 737 and A320 series' are put to their graves. With that said, I would expect AA to assess the need for this type of aircraft farther down the road.
|
There is no speculation to begin. Any major airline evaluates every major aircraft release. it's not even clear yet Airbus will even launch it unless they get orders. The aircraft is very loosely defined at this point in terms of true capabilities. It's more a trial balloon if they will launch it given what it might cost.
|
Originally Posted by grahampros
(Post 23793651)
There is no speculation to begin. Any major airline evaluates every major aircraft release. it's not even clear yet Airbus will even launch it unless they get orders. The aircraft is very loosely defined at this point in terms of true capabilities. It's more a trial balloon if they will launch it given what it might cost.
|
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 23793663)
Is that TATL capabilities? Can they make it? Is that enough range? Can they fly JFK-BSL nonstop?
|
If this is strictly for 757 replacements and new routes, then I am for it (As much as I will miss the 757). However I sincerely hope the airlines do not use this as a replacement for widebody flying.
|
I think AA should wait until there is a clean sheet replacement 757 developed, and not spend their money on an airframe from the 80's with upgraded engines and an extra fuel tank. Boeing has been mulling over a replacement aircraft past year or so. It needs to be slightly wider, and keep the first class cabin separate.
|
Originally Posted by grahampros
(Post 23793651)
There is no speculation to begin. Any major airline evaluates every major aircraft release. it's not even clear yet Airbus will even launch it unless they get orders. The aircraft is very loosely defined at this point in terms of true capabilities. It's more a trial balloon if they will launch it given what it might cost.
|
I've been wondering what the future holds for the 757 market.
|
Originally Posted by davidviolin
(Post 23794655)
I think AA should wait until there is a clean sheet replacement 757 developed, and not spend their money on an airframe from the 80's with upgraded engines and an extra fuel tank. Boeing has been mulling over a replacement aircraft past year or so. It needs to be slightly wider, and keep the first class cabin separate.
|
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 23793663)
Is that TATL capabilities? Can they make it? Is that enough range? Can they fly JFK-BSL nonstop?
|
Originally Posted by davidviolin
(Post 23794655)
I think AA should wait until there is a clean sheet replacement 757 developed, and not spend their money on an airframe from the 80's with upgraded engines and an extra fuel tank. Boeing has been mulling over a replacement aircraft past year or so. It needs to be slightly wider, and keep the first class cabin separate.
80-90% of what 757s were used for during their heyday (TCON, Hawaii, point to point in the USA) are now missions for A320s and 737NGs. A plane that maybe sells 300 of the type is going to be a huge waste of cash for Boeing. |
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
(Post 23795641)
A plane that maybe sells 300 of the type is going to be a huge waste of cash.
|
Originally Posted by ShadowCaptain
(Post 23795530)
Well BA currently fly A319's from London City to New York, albeit on a lighter configuration. So I'm sure it could, it just depends on how they configure it if they actually buy any.
|
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
(Post 23795641)
The market for 757s as a narrowbody TATL replacement (which is basically the market you're looking at) isn't big enough to justify a clean sheet replacement. If it happens it's going to be a stretch/re-engine of the 737Max.
80-90% of what 757s were used for during their heyday (TCON, Hawaii, point to point in the USA) are now missions for A320s and 737NGs. A plane that maybe sells 300 of the type is going to be a huge waste of cash for Boeing. The only way Being could design a "slightly wider" narrowbody aircraft would be with strong ptedictions the aircraft would be so revolutionary (think composies, for one,) they could fotecast thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of sales as the 737 and 320 families become obsolete. The 737 and all Being narrowbodies use the basic 707 fuselage - they've sold many 707-720, 727, 737, 757s, all with the basic 707 dimensions. Going to a new design would be a quantum leap. As to 321LRneo, potentially it could replace 757s transatlantic or Hawai'i, but can it handle LPB? For Hawai'i length sectors, might AA not find it more economical to develop a subfleet of ETOPS-rated 738s, such as Alaska does? Speculation, all of it. ;) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:05 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.