Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Arrrrgh stupid stupid (agent at MCO book poor connection)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2007, 8:51 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA GLD (1MM), DL GLD, Marriott Plat, RCL D+, X Elite
Posts: 3,229
Originally Posted by jrhone
Most delayed flights now have a banner in the check in response screen that says something like "flight may be delayed, check flifo " or something along those lines. I believe the info comes straight from DECS or maybe flifo itself.

Someone used to have to do that manually....it's a good thing that it's automatic.
MJonTravel is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 9:22 am
  #47  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, England
Programs: MUCCI -- What else matters?
Posts: 1,096
Originally Posted by gemac
Whether a 3 hour flight into ORD with a 55 minute connection to an international flight is reasonable or not is a matter of opinion. Had you asked here in advance, I suspect that most would have advised a longer connection (I know I would have).
Actually I agree. In my defense, it was actually the platinum desk that booked me onto the flights originally, and I stupidly didn't ask how long the connection was. Usually going outbound from the US I'd allow a minimum of two hours and inbound a minimum of three.

Originally Posted by gemac
Anyone can travel when everything works perfectly. One of the reasons for the existence of FT is to exchange information on how to plan for the imperfect, to keep it from biting you in the behind. These questions have been asked and answered many times here, so the information is here to read for those who care to do so. Still, we get plenty of threads from those who have chosen not to avail themselves of this information, ranting about how they have been abused by the airline. These threads tend to get little sympathy, as the reader often feels that with due care the problem could have been easily avoided.

In your case, the problem would never have existed if you had booked the earlier flight, as the experience of 120,000 FT members might have suggested. You would have had a relaxing visit to the ORD Admiral's Club, then walked on your flight, and retrieved your baggage in London.
Actually it would have been worse - the earlier flight was cancelled, and the standby list for the flight I ended up taking was *huge* (another reason why I was surprised they didn't want to offload my luggage and be done with me!).

I still think it was unfair of AA to check me in when my connection was reduced to -5 minutes *and* not let me get my checked luggage back four hours before the flight. But hey, that's me.

Also, there is no Admiral's Club in ORD - I was in the plastic seats along with a couple of other plats and an executive platinum (who were also quite aghast that I couldn't either get my bags back or a promise that AA would deliver them to me in London).

Oh well. How's everyone enjoying the long weekend? :-)

-simon
SimonsMiles is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 9:23 am
  #48  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, England
Programs: MUCCI -- What else matters?
Posts: 1,096
Originally Posted by flyastrojets
Curious to know if the OP has received his luggage yet?
Yup, arrived on Sunday, kids now playing with funky new toys :-)

-simon
SimonsMiles is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 9:27 am
  #49  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Siesta Key
Programs: AA EXP-1.6MM, Hilton Diamond, ManU & Chicago Bears #1 Fan
Posts: 9,697
Originally Posted by SimonsMiles

Also, there is no Admiral's Club in ORD

huh???

Are you smoking something?
andrzej is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 10:04 am
  #50  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP / LT PLT / 3MM, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 35,436
Originally Posted by SimonsMiles
Also, there is no Admiral's Club in ORD
There are two.
vasantn is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 10:12 am
  #51  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by vasantn
There are two.
So-- in a sense-- he was accurate.
JonNYC is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 10:37 am
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP / LT PLT / 3MM, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 35,436
Originally Posted by JonNYC
So-- in a sense-- he was accurate.
Indeed.
vasantn is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 10:38 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: AA
Posts: 85
Originally Posted by SimonsMiles
Also, there is no Admiral's Club in ORD -
That damn stupid lying check-in lady fooled you a second time...
qwe9999 is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 10:52 am
  #54  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Programs: AA 2MM, AS MVP Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 12,966
Originally Posted by SimonsMiles
Actually I agree. In my defense, it was actually the platinum desk that booked me onto the flights originally, and I stupidly didn't ask how long the connection was. Usually going outbound from the US I'd allow a minimum of two hours and inbound a minimum of three.
I normally find that any assumption that an AAgent knows more about AA operations than I do is unfounded. I like the results better when I book myself. The telephone AAgents often don't actually fly much, and they assume that if a connection meets minimum connect times, it is OK.

Originally Posted by SimonsMiles
I still think it was unfair of AA to check me in when my connection was reduced to -5 minutes *and* not let me get my checked luggage back four hours before the flight. But hey, that's me.
Retrieval of one bag seems like it should be easy, but in reality it is not. The baggage area of a modern airport is a sea of baggage, and locating one bag is not at all easy. Have you ever been on a flight where a bag had to be pulled because that passenger did not board? It takes a long time.

Again, it seems you were relying on the AAgent to do for you what you were unwilling to do yourself (look at the flight departure time prior to your checkin). I know that I would never work for what AA (and other airlines) pay their telephone reps, check-in agents, and gate agents, so I do not expect them to be as competent, careful, and caring about my specific flight as I am. When I rely on my own efforts, I am rarely disappointed.

Originally Posted by SimonsMiles
Also, there is no Admiral's Club in ORD - I was in the plastic seats along with a couple of other plats and an executive platinum (who were also quite aghast that I couldn't either get my bags back or a promise that AA would deliver them to me in London).
Well, I have found plats (and even EXPs) who believe the most amazing things. Just because they fly a lot doesn't mean they are knowledgable.

As for the concept that AA should carry your bag from ORD to LON while you fly on another carrier at your own choosing, I'm don't think their responsibility extends that far.

Note that if you had flown to ORD and missed your connection, your request would have been much more reasonable - especially if AA had no further flights that day to put you on.

Lastly, a quick peek at aa.com would have shown the location of the Admiral's Club. Did you rely on someone else again?
gemac is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 12:48 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,698
Originally Posted by gemac
Again, it seems you were relying on the AAgent to do for you what you were unwilling to do yourself (look at the flight departure time prior to your checkin). I know that I would never work for what AA (and other airlines) pay their telephone reps, check-in agents, and gate agents, so I do not expect them to be as competent, careful, and caring about my specific flight as I am. When I rely on my own efforts, I am rarely disappointed.
This seems like a very strange attitude. Usually, when someone works in a specific area or industry, I'd expect them to know more about that area than I do regardless of our relative pay.

For example, I suspect that many carpenters earn less than I do. I would not for a moment assume that therefore if I want the frame of a house expertly hammered together that I should just do it myself because clearly my high salary makes me more capable than carpenters. In fact, I would expect that the carpenter would be much better at this regardless of his or her pay. After all, they spend most of their time doing carpentry and I spend most of my time in front of a computer. (Similarly, I suspect my computer skills are much better than Kobe Bryant's despite the fact that he might not be willing to settle for my salary.)

Based on many stories here, airlines like American seem not particularly interested in actually providing a reasonable level of expertise amongst their employees. This seems much more of a failing by American (and the employee in question) than the OP, though.
jordyn is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 12:53 pm
  #56  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, England
Programs: MUCCI -- What else matters?
Posts: 1,096
Hahaha, superb - I *read* ORD, but somehow understood ORlanDo (MCO).

My apologies. What I *meant* to say is that there is no Admiral's Club in MCO! Of course that's no longer relevant to the discussion, but hey ;-)

-simon
SimonsMiles is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 1:47 pm
  #57  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Programs: AA 2MM, AS MVP Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 12,966
Originally Posted by jordyn
This seems like a very strange attitude. Usually, when someone works in a specific area or industry, I'd expect them to know more about that area than I do regardless of our relative pay.

For example, I suspect that many carpenters earn less than I do. I would not for a moment assume that therefore if I want the frame of a house expertly hammered together that I should just do it myself because clearly my high salary makes me more capable than carpenters. In fact, I would expect that the carpenter would be much better at this regardless of his or her pay. After all, they spend most of their time doing carpentry and I spend most of my time in front of a computer. (Similarly, I suspect my computer skills are much better than Kobe Bryant's despite the fact that he might not be willing to settle for my salary.)

Based on many stories here, airlines like American seem not particularly interested in actually providing a reasonable level of expertise amongst their employees. This seems much more of a failing by American (and the employee in question) than the OP, though.
You seem to be discussing the way that the world should be. I am discussing the way that the world is.
gemac is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 2:50 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,698
Originally Posted by gemac
You seem to be discussing the way that the world should be. I am discussing the way that the world is.
So is there some part of the last paragraph I wrote that you'd disagree with? I agree that American seems uninterested in providing the level of service that we'd expect in most industries. I'm just unsure as to how this becomes the OP's fault.

It becomes a bit of a fool's errand to have to figure out all of this stuff yourself when incorrect responses are provided to direct questions. OPs only hope to have avoided his bad situation would have been to have some special insight into American's operations that the TA apparently lacked. He did his due dilligence by explicitly asking whether the flight was on-time or not. Once he discovered there was a problem, he notified the airline quickly. I suppose there's a chance the monitors in the terminal could have displayed the new time, but they are so often incorrect that it seems like quite a leap of faith to assume that there was a better source of information for the OP to rely on in this case.
jordyn is offline  
Old May 28, 2007, 3:37 pm
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Programs: AA 2MM, AS MVP Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 12,966
Originally Posted by jordyn
So is there some part of the last paragraph I wrote that you'd disagree with? I agree that American seems uninterested in providing the level of service that we'd expect in most industries. I'm just unsure as to how this becomes the OP's fault.
1. This situation is not unique to American among airlines, nor is it unique to airlines.
2. If all one had to do to get perfect, well-informed answers to all one's questions was to ask an AAgent, then why are we all asking (and answering) questions on FT? Just ask one of those perfect agents.
3. It is not the OP's fault that AAgents are imperfect (indeed, often far from perfect). But, as an AA elite, the OP should fly enough to realize this already. If he realized it, then why does he entrust his fate to these flawed minions? The triumph of hope over experience?
4. FT is all about learning about the ins and outs of airline travel, so that we control our own destinies, rather than being subject to the whims and fancies of the misinformed AAgents. OP chose to act otherwise, despite having been here long enough, and having been active enough, to have known better. That is his fault.
5. Mewling on FT is unlikely to change AA (and other airlines). OP (and the rest of us) have but two choices. We can accept the torrent of misinformation that comes from airline employees (and accept the consequences in our lives), or we can become informed, so that we can avoid most pitfalls and know our options for those we cannot avoid. We each make our choice.
gemac is offline  
Old May 29, 2007, 12:46 am
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW/DAL
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, AS MVPG, HH Diamond, NCL Platinum Plus, MSC Diamond
Posts: 21,422
Originally Posted by SimonsMiles
Indeed, it could - I'm looking at the kids asleep on the sofa right now and I'm glad to be back. But it could also have been so much better if they had either not checked me in for this connection while lying about it being on time, or if they had managed to get my luggage back in the FOUR HOURS before the flight so I could get on another flight (which had availability), or if they had offered to get my luggage to its destination and let me get on the Virgin flight (they said if I refund my ticket my luggage will be stuck in Chicago and will not be their responsibility).

I don't blame AA for the weather or earlier cancellations. I do blame them for the state of their customer service!

-simon
They can't offer to fly your luggage on a plane that you aren't on.

Could you have used the BA lounge at MCO, since you are PLT on an internation itinerary?
mvoight is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.