LFBU: Non-elite, space-available, counter and kiosk upgrades (obsolete)
#76
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Programs: AA PLT, SPG Platinum
Posts: 3,465
Originally Posted by Spiff
DL (SBUP)
UA
HP
?
NW does this too.
#77
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Programs: AA PLT, SPG Platinum
Posts: 3,465
Originally Posted by JonNYC
I don't agree.
When *protect* is used, it means something very specific.
When *protect* is used, it means something very specific.
Sorry Jon, I have to disagree. First, they also use the word "attempt" in reference to the upgrade. And, "protect" is only used in reference to the new flight. They have been "protected" by being placed on a different flight, and AA will "attempt" to upgrade them on that flight. At least that's how I interpret it.
#78
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
de leted
#79
Join Date: May 2005
Location: JFK
Programs: AAdvantage EXP/ConciergeKey
Posts: 292
I think this is another reason why we may see further cuts in first class... Premium cabine is slowly and surely becoming EconomyExtra... and there is no reason it shoudn't given the price tag on it. It is one thing to offer upgrades to unsold premium seats to your EXPs who spend 100,000+ miles with the company; it's a whole diffrent ball game to offer it to someone who flies with AA for the first time and very likely not going to again any time soon.
AA will soon see that for the price of the seat, a pax is getting the value of the money by having a seat more confy then the one in economy, no meal/service required.
AA will soon see that for the price of the seat, a pax is getting the value of the money by having a seat more confy then the one in economy, no meal/service required.
#80
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by FlyACN
I think this is another reason why we may see further cuts in first class... Premium cabine is slowly and surely becoming EconomyExtra... and there is no reason it shoudn't given the price tag on it. It is one thing to offer upgrades to unsold premium seats to your EXPs who spend 100,000+ miles with the company; it's a whole diffrent ball game to offer it to someone who flies with AA for the first time and very likely not going to again any time soon.
#81
Join Date: May 2005
Location: JFK
Programs: AAdvantage EXP/ConciergeKey
Posts: 292
Originally Posted by JonNYC
Well, that's a point. But as pointed out above, it does appear at least 4 other U.S. carriers currently do this.
#82
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Programs: AA PLT, SPG Platinum
Posts: 3,465
Originally Posted by FlyACN
I think this is another reason why we may see further cuts in first class... Premium cabine is slowly and surely becoming EconomyExtra... and there is no reason it shoudn't given the price tag on it. It is one thing to offer upgrades to unsold premium seats to your EXPs who spend 100,000+ miles with the company; it's a whole diffrent ball game to offer it to someone who flies with AA for the first time and very likely not going to again any time soon.
AA will soon see that for the price of the seat, a pax is getting the value of the money by having a seat more confy then the one in economy, no meal/service required.
AA will soon see that for the price of the seat, a pax is getting the value of the money by having a seat more confy then the one in economy, no meal/service required.
I don't think this will lead to further cuts. No matter what, however you slice it, on no domestic flight is the opportunity cost of F over Y greater than $50/500mi. I don't care how much you drink, or what meal they serve, it's just not going to happen. So, while they may decide to cut things further, I don't think it will be because of this. If anything, these people are paying more for their F seat than elites, and therefore will lead to more $/FC seat filled.
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hat ON -
More then a few edits and deletions - the topic is way to important to get hijacked and closed..... so everyone who's had an edit or delete - consider yourselves warned - that includes baiting and reacting. Those of you who may be tempted to get into the fray in a non constructive way - (off topic and personal), consider yourselves warned.
Let's keep this topic open.....Hat off-
I consider that we (as a AA board) are lucky to have a few people who have provided early warning to the changes in coming with AA and it's greatly appreciated. If it turns out to be fact - I know this thread will grow by people contributing their own experience - and if the program doesn't start - (like the promise of VIPOW's being tracked online in our account) no big deal.
Let's keep this topic open.....Hat off-
I consider that we (as a AA board) are lucky to have a few people who have provided early warning to the changes in coming with AA and it's greatly appreciated. If it turns out to be fact - I know this thread will grow by people contributing their own experience - and if the program doesn't start - (like the promise of VIPOW's being tracked online in our account) no big deal.
#85
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 350
I'm going to go ahead and think positively. Perhaps we'll have fewer upgrades clear at the gate and more clear at the 4-hour mark so there will be greater opportunity to sell the remaining seats at the kiosk as people check in?
#86
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP, BA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton diamond, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 33,574
Originally Posted by CharlesMD
So until I hear otherwise from AA...
Cheers.
#87
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bellevue, WA-AAEXP3mm
Posts: 2,962
I'm all for AA trying to pick up "incremental" revenue wherever they can provided it's doesn't prove a dilution to Elite benefits...and this doesn't sound to me (if implemented as listed on the OP) like a bad move at all. Time will tell! Thanks for the heads up, jon.
#88
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA & UK -- AA EXP 3.5MM, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, Avis President's Club
Posts: 6,411
I'm wondering how this might effect the desired check-in time for non-elites. If they check in too early, maybe the LFBU's aren't available yet. If they check in too late, maybe the LFBU's are already all gone.
I do interpret the program as an attempt by AA to sell FC seats which would have otherwise gone out empty. I don't see how the new program will affect elite upgrades in the slightest. About the only effect I can think of is if an elite decides to sticker-upgrade at the last minute. In that case, maybe all the upgrades for that flight would have already been given out. I can't think of any other possible effect on elite upgrades. (We can always hope!)
I do interpret the program as an attempt by AA to sell FC seats which would have otherwise gone out empty. I don't see how the new program will affect elite upgrades in the slightest. About the only effect I can think of is if an elite decides to sticker-upgrade at the last minute. In that case, maybe all the upgrades for that flight would have already been given out. I can't think of any other possible effect on elite upgrades. (We can always hope!)
#89
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by alamedaguy
oops.
#90
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Programs: AA Plat, CO Gold
Posts: 1,598
Originally Posted by Fly AA J all the way
No matter what, however you slice it, on no domestic flight is the opportunity cost of F over Y greater than $50/500mi. I don't care how much you drink, or what meal they serve, it's just not going to happen.
But yes, I agree that on average, AA will certainly make money on $50/500mi upgrades on a marginal basis. The question is what will this do to their paid revenue? Presumably that will decrease by a bit. Some people will decide to buy a Y ticket instead of an F ticket because the flight looks wide open. Some people will decide that going for Gold isn't worth it because LFBUs are generally available on their flights so they'll feel free to either fly less or buy cheaper tickets on alternative carriers. My feeling is that AA will probably come out ahead (though the implementation and training costs are not insignificant), but only time will tell.
BTW, JonNYC, thanks for the great info as always!
Last edited by acf573; Dec 5, 2005 at 7:06 pm