LFBU: Non-elite, space-available, counter and kiosk upgrades (obsolete)
#31
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: AA EXP 1MM, HH Gold, dirt loads of places.
Posts: 1,657
Well, on the plus side this won't affect my chances of international op-ups
Furthermore I don't believe that LFBUs will get priority over elites. At least for now. for the time being.
However, I wonder whether there's a risk that this might mean fewer elite upgrades clearing in advance. Sort of a YM equation that runs "given LFBU then releasing fewer seats to X until day of flight ... [some complicated YM calculus] ... profit!!!"
Furthermore I don't believe that LFBUs will get priority over elites. At least for now. for the time being.
However, I wonder whether there's a risk that this might mean fewer elite upgrades clearing in advance. Sort of a YM equation that runs "given LFBU then releasing fewer seats to X until day of flight ... [some complicated YM calculus] ... profit!!!"
#32
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MHT/BOS <--> World
Programs: AA Plat 2.8MM
Posts: 4,629
I don't care if AA occasionally gets $ ($50 per 500 miles) from a passenger instead of upgrading me...so long as I get upgraded most of the time.
#33
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alameda, CA, USA
Posts: 4,934
Originally Posted by wanaflyforless
I don't care if AA occasionally gets $ ($50 per 500 miles) from a passenger instead of upgrading me...so long as I get upgraded most of the time.
I would also be willing to split the money with AA, at a rate of $15 per 500 miles.
#34
Moderator, OneWorld
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 11,846
AS has been selling paid last-minute upgrades for years (way cheaper than these jobbies BTW) and there are still empty seats from time to time even on busy flights.
I think turning the kiosks into POS (that would be "point of sale") devices for revenue enhancement is a swell idea. Would you like a pizza with your upgrade? $60 per 500 mi. Yum!
I think turning the kiosks into POS (that would be "point of sale") devices for revenue enhancement is a swell idea. Would you like a pizza with your upgrade? $60 per 500 mi. Yum!
#35
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,960
Originally Posted by j3823x
Anyway, I think the possibility of elite members getting bypassed for upgrades several times in favor of non-elite members getting upgrades is not a fair trade-off for the ability to upgrade award travel. I'm traveling on paid trips much more often than award trips.
EXP
PLT
GLD
non-elite full-fare upgrade (Y/B)
EXP Award upgrade (paid)
PLT Award upgrade (paid)
GLD Award upgrade (paid)
LFBU for all non-elite
#36
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: AA PLT; UA Gold
Posts: 5,378
As has been mentioned, the impact of this system depends completely on the policy they use to allocate between elite upgrades and paid upgrades. I don't think we can judge this as either benign or detrimental until we find out what policy they use. As a recent example, the split of the YUP buckets into YUP/A and YUP/P appears to have benefitted upgraders rather than hurting them, contrary to what some (including myself) had assumed to be the goal.
Maybe Connected1 can shed some light?
In any event, this was inevitable, what with AS selling first-class upgrades, UA selling E+ upgrades, etc.
Maybe Connected1 can shed some light?
In any event, this was inevitable, what with AS selling first-class upgrades, UA selling E+ upgrades, etc.
#37
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Programs: AA PLT, SPG Platinum
Posts: 3,465
Originally Posted by chartreuse
Well, on the plus side this won't affect my chances of international op-ups
Furthermore I don't believe that LFBUs will get priority over elites. At least for now. for the time being.
However, I wonder whether there's a risk that this might mean fewer elite upgrades clearing in advance. Sort of a YM equation that runs "given LFBU then releasing fewer seats to X until day of flight ... [some complicated YM calculus] ... profit!!!"
Furthermore I don't believe that LFBUs will get priority over elites. At least for now. for the time being.
However, I wonder whether there's a risk that this might mean fewer elite upgrades clearing in advance. Sort of a YM equation that runs "given LFBU then releasing fewer seats to X until day of flight ... [some complicated YM calculus] ... profit!!!"
#38
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,630
How many upgradable seats are going unsold?
How many flights has anyone been on that there were empty first class seats
that could be SOLD as upgrades? I have been on none.
that could be SOLD as upgrades? I have been on none.
#39
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 235
38n self-service will do additional checks at time of
39n check-in to determine if sufficient inventory is
40n available to offer the lfbu. determining factors
41n include the number of revenue customers on the priority
42n list, in addition to how many aadvantage members are
43n waitlisted for an upgrade. this will help ensure there
44n are seats available for last minute full-fare first
45n class customers and aadvantage upgrades.
39n check-in to determine if sufficient inventory is
40n available to offer the lfbu. determining factors
41n include the number of revenue customers on the priority
42n list, in addition to how many aadvantage members are
43n waitlisted for an upgrade. this will help ensure there
44n are seats available for last minute full-fare first
45n class customers and aadvantage upgrades.
#40
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: AA PLT; UA Gold
Posts: 5,378
Originally Posted by Fly AA J all the way
That doesn't make any sense. If they hold the X back, then those elites requesting upgrades will be added to the wait list. That wait list will still be cleared before these new upgrades are given. Therefore, it doesn't matter how far out the upgrades clear or don't clear for elites, they will still be cleared before the LFBUs.
#41
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 235
Originally Posted by zman
How many flights has anyone been on that there were empty first class seats
that could be SOLD as upgrades? I have been on none.
that could be SOLD as upgrades? I have been on none.
#42
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PIT/DFW/MEL; AA Exec. Platinum & 4MM, QF WP
Posts: 7,689
Originally Posted by GoBears99
Keep in mind that employees flying non revenue often fill up the first class cabin when it's empty, so these upgrades will likely displace those folks, not the elite members.
not many folks will cough up $250-$300 for a transcon trip oneway, or $200 for LAX-ORD.
Given that, I'd see the system on AA as a win-win--- a little more revenue for AA, and a shot at upgrading AAward tickets for elite members...
#43
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 7,368
Originally Posted by zman
How many flights has anyone been on that there were empty first class seats
that could be SOLD as upgrades? I have been on none.
that could be SOLD as upgrades? I have been on none.
Given the text posted, I see this as a way for AA to raise revenue on routes with lower F loads, not as a threat to elite upgrades. And while it runs the chance of filling the cabin, it doesn't always do it - as Gardyloo mentioned, the paid AS upgrades don't always fill the F cabin (nor did the QQ program, when Reno Air did the same thing).
Mike
#44
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by zman
How many flights has anyone been on that there were empty first class seats
that could be SOLD as upgrades? I have been on none.
that could be SOLD as upgrades? I have been on none.
Originally Posted by justageek
Maybe I missed something, but did the announcement actually say that the elite upgrade wait list will be cleared before the LFBUs are sold? If not, I would assume this woud actually not be the case, due to revenue maximization goals.
#45
Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2002
Programs: AA EXP, BA GLD, FT < 30 y
Posts: 2,106
I will believe this when I see it from AA.
Last edited by askworldtraveler; Dec 5, 2005 at 6:05 pm Reason: heading personal