Stopover keeps breaking the fare
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Stopover keeps breaking the fare
I have been working a circuitous routing between ORD-GRU and the damn fare keeps breaking at stopover!! I can't really pinpoint the problem and it's killing me.
Trying to work out ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU r/t fare. I am totally blowing past the MPM but that's fine. I believe it's a 15% surcharge for going over MPM? Let's assume that's fine. Now, according to fare rules - there are no HIP checks and free stopover at North American Gateway. Min stay is first Sunday after last stopover and under total trip under 90 days.
Not really very clear on the Seasonality of the fare. Is it on dates of travel from origin/ destination or from gateway?
So I am trying to keep this in same season, meeting min stay reqs and max stay reqs. However, fare still breaks when adding a stopover.
For ex -
Trip 1:
ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU-MIA-LAX-ORD
08/13-11/02
Total fare - $958
For some reason it's getting booked under different fare basis - QLE3MGQ1/ QLX5MDQ1 for each direction. Not sure why.
Trip 2:
ORD-LAX-MIA(stop)-GRU-MIA-LAX-ORD
08/13(stop @mia)-10/22(from mia)-11/02
Total fare - $1300+
Booking under - OB21ZNI3 (ORD-LAX)/ SB14ZNK1 (LAX-MIA)/ QNE7MGQ1 (MIA-SAO)/ QLX5MDQ1 (SAO-ORD)
Furthermore, I don't understand how is ITA working here... I checked inventory on all segments given by ITA. It is pricing everything in Q whereas some segments are O7 and some are S2. Inbound leg on both trips are priced in Q but there are legs where it's Q0 and G7 (is G a restricted fare?).
Can anyone tell what am I doing wrong in booking the stopover? Or is ITAs pricing is wildly off mark in respect to availability?
Trying to work out ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU r/t fare. I am totally blowing past the MPM but that's fine. I believe it's a 15% surcharge for going over MPM? Let's assume that's fine. Now, according to fare rules - there are no HIP checks and free stopover at North American Gateway. Min stay is first Sunday after last stopover and under total trip under 90 days.
Not really very clear on the Seasonality of the fare. Is it on dates of travel from origin/ destination or from gateway?
TO BRAZIL -
PERMITTED 13JAN THROUGH 11FEB OR 16FEB THROUGH 09JUL
OR 04AUG THROUGH 01JAN FOR EACH TRIP FROM THE
GATEWAY. SEASON IS BASED ON TRIP DATE.
PERMITTED 13JAN THROUGH 11FEB OR 16FEB THROUGH 09JUL
OR 04AUG THROUGH 01JAN FOR EACH TRIP FROM THE
GATEWAY. SEASON IS BASED ON TRIP DATE.
For ex -
Trip 1:
ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU-MIA-LAX-ORD
08/13-11/02
Total fare - $958
For some reason it's getting booked under different fare basis - QLE3MGQ1/ QLX5MDQ1 for each direction. Not sure why.
Trip 2:
ORD-LAX-MIA(stop)-GRU-MIA-LAX-ORD
08/13(stop @mia)-10/22(from mia)-11/02
Total fare - $1300+
Booking under - OB21ZNI3 (ORD-LAX)/ SB14ZNK1 (LAX-MIA)/ QNE7MGQ1 (MIA-SAO)/ QLX5MDQ1 (SAO-ORD)
Furthermore, I don't understand how is ITA working here... I checked inventory on all segments given by ITA. It is pricing everything in Q whereas some segments are O7 and some are S2. Inbound leg on both trips are priced in Q but there are legs where it's Q0 and G7 (is G a restricted fare?).
Can anyone tell what am I doing wrong in booking the stopover? Or is ITAs pricing is wildly off mark in respect to availability?
Last edited by carsnoceans; Apr 21, 2015 at 6:44 pm Reason: Stopover date fixed
#2
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: OW Emerald
Posts: 1,452
For starters,
Isn't 10/23 a Friday?
DAY/TIME PERMITTED MON THROUGH THU FROM THE GATEWAY.
#4
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: OW Emerald
Posts: 1,452
TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS TRAVEL ON THIS FARE COMPONENT ON EACH TRIP MUST
COMMENCE BY MIDNIGHT ON 30AUG15.
COMMENCE BY MIDNIGHT ON 30AUG15.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
08.08 to 09.07 (same route)
$958
08.08 to 08.27 to 09.07
$1165
Not only the price was changed, ITA forced a different route. My argument was "aa lax aa" so only one layover at LAX between ORD and MIA. But ITA gave me 2-stops LAX and LAS. LAX layover was 60+hrs.
Note outbound leg(s) are on weekend but fare basis has no Mon-Thru travel restriction on that component.
This is driving me bonkers!!
PS - This is not a problem using ITA. But I don't think ITA is being very accurate between a R/t vs multi-city for same dates and same origin/destination points.
Last edited by carsnoceans; Apr 21, 2015 at 10:22 pm
#6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: used to be PER, now it's nowhere/eveywhere
Programs: QFF NB, AA GLD
Posts: 3,467
You might find more expert advice in the ita-specific thread http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milea...tures-ita.html
Last edited by pandaperth; Apr 21, 2015 at 9:28 pm
#7
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: OW Emerald
Posts: 1,452
08.08 to 08.27 to 09.07
$1165
Not only the price was changed, ITA forced a different route. My argument was "aa lax aa" so only one layover at LAX between ORD and MIA. But ITA gave me 2-stops LAX and LAS. LAX layover was 60+hrs.
Note outbound leg(s) are on weekend but fare basis has no Mon-Thru travel restriction on that component.
$1165
Not only the price was changed, ITA forced a different route. My argument was "aa lax aa" so only one layover at LAX between ORD and MIA. But ITA gave me 2-stops LAX and LAS. LAX layover was 60+hrs.
Note outbound leg(s) are on weekend but fare basis has no Mon-Thru travel restriction on that component.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
I, too, think availability is the culprit here. But then it's ITA that's screwing up. It is pricing in Q fare whereas it should be looking up N or S (whatever is available).
#9
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 6,424
I don't understand. Why is the availability going to be different for ORD-LAX-MIA vs ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU?
I, too, think availability is the culprit here. But then it's ITA that's screwing up. It is pricing in Q fare whereas it should be looking up N or S (whatever is available).
I, too, think availability is the culprit here. But then it's ITA that's screwing up. It is pricing in Q fare whereas it should be looking up N or S (whatever is available).
AA 1243 0 ORD
08/13/15 7:10 AM LAX
08/13/15 9:45 AM 738
Su,M,T,W,Th,F
78% / 40m F7 P6 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0
AA 1297 0 LAX
08/13/15 10:45 AM MIA
08/13/15 7:10 PM 738
Daily
NA / NA F7 P3 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0
AA 929 0 MIA
08/13/15 9:50 PM GRU
08/14/15 7:15 AM 77W
Su,T,W,Th,Sa
62% / 42m F7 P2 A0 J7 R7 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0
08/13/15 7:10 AM LAX
08/13/15 9:45 AM 738
Su,M,T,W,Th,F
78% / 40m F7 P6 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0
AA 1297 0 LAX
08/13/15 10:45 AM MIA
08/13/15 7:10 PM 738
Daily
NA / NA F7 P3 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0
AA 929 0 MIA
08/13/15 9:50 PM GRU
08/14/15 7:15 AM 77W
Su,T,W,Th,Sa
62% / 42m F7 P2 A0 J7 R7 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0
AA 1243 0 ORD
08/13/15 7:10 AM LAX
08/13/15 9:45 AM 738
Su,M,T,W,Th,F
78% / 40m F7 P6 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2
AA 252 0 LAX
08/13/15 2:00 PM MIA
08/13/15 10:07 PM 777
Daily
78% / 11m F7 P7 A7 J7 R0 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2
AA 995 0 MIA
08/14/15 12:01 AM GRU
08/14/15 9:25 AM 77W
Su,M,Th,F,Sa
66% / 86m F7 P7 A7 J7 R7 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2
08/13/15 7:10 AM LAX
08/13/15 9:45 AM 738
Su,M,T,W,Th,F
78% / 40m F7 P6 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2
AA 252 0 LAX
08/13/15 2:00 PM MIA
08/13/15 10:07 PM 777
Daily
78% / 11m F7 P7 A7 J7 R0 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2
AA 995 0 MIA
08/14/15 12:01 AM GRU
08/14/15 9:25 AM 77W
Su,M,Th,F,Sa
66% / 86m F7 P7 A7 J7 R7 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Married segments. You are buying a fare from ORD-GRU so there has be availability for the exact routing for the fare to work; otherwise it gets broken up into parts. This is what your are seeing.
See if this works:
If it does put it on hold and call web services to add the stopover.
See if this works:
If it does put it on hold and call web services to add the stopover.
Would stopover have to be part of the same inventory?
#11
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 6,424
Yes, QR is really bad about them. Yes, same inventory. Put a non-stopover routing on hold and call web services, they should be able to help.