Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Stopover keeps breaking the fare

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2015, 5:35 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Stopover keeps breaking the fare

I have been working a circuitous routing between ORD-GRU and the damn fare keeps breaking at stopover!! I can't really pinpoint the problem and it's killing me.

Trying to work out ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU r/t fare. I am totally blowing past the MPM but that's fine. I believe it's a 15% surcharge for going over MPM? Let's assume that's fine. Now, according to fare rules - there are no HIP checks and free stopover at North American Gateway. Min stay is first Sunday after last stopover and under total trip under 90 days.

Not really very clear on the Seasonality of the fare. Is it on dates of travel from origin/ destination or from gateway?
TO BRAZIL -
PERMITTED 13JAN THROUGH 11FEB OR 16FEB THROUGH 09JUL
OR 04AUG THROUGH 01JAN FOR EACH TRIP FROM THE
GATEWAY. SEASON IS BASED ON TRIP DATE.
So I am trying to keep this in same season, meeting min stay reqs and max stay reqs. However, fare still breaks when adding a stopover.

For ex -

Trip 1:
ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU-MIA-LAX-ORD
08/13-11/02
Total fare - $958
For some reason it's getting booked under different fare basis - QLE3MGQ1/ QLX5MDQ1 for each direction. Not sure why.

Trip 2:
ORD-LAX-MIA(stop)-GRU-MIA-LAX-ORD
08/13(stop @mia)-10/22(from mia)-11/02
Total fare - $1300+
Booking under - OB21ZNI3 (ORD-LAX)/ SB14ZNK1 (LAX-MIA)/ QNE7MGQ1 (MIA-SAO)/ QLX5MDQ1 (SAO-ORD)

Furthermore, I don't understand how is ITA working here... I checked inventory on all segments given by ITA. It is pricing everything in Q whereas some segments are O7 and some are S2. Inbound leg on both trips are priced in Q but there are legs where it's Q0 and G7 (is G a restricted fare?).

Can anyone tell what am I doing wrong in booking the stopover? Or is ITAs pricing is wildly off mark in respect to availability?

Last edited by carsnoceans; Apr 21, 2015 at 6:44 pm Reason: Stopover date fixed
carsnoceans is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 6:10 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: OW Emerald
Posts: 1,452
For starters,
DAY/TIME PERMITTED MON THROUGH THU FROM THE GATEWAY.
Isn't 10/23 a Friday?
jridge is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 6:43 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Originally Posted by jridge
For starters,


Isn't 10/23 a Friday?
Must be a typo. I selected all M-Thu dates on this one.

Edit - Also, why would it matter? That restriction is only on inbound leg (SAO-ORD) which doesn't have a stopover.

Last edited by carsnoceans; Apr 21, 2015 at 7:01 pm
carsnoceans is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 7:17 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: OW Emerald
Posts: 1,452
TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS TRAVEL ON THIS FARE COMPONENT ON EACH TRIP MUST
COMMENCE BY MIDNIGHT ON 30AUG15.
Unless I'm mistaken, "trip" would mean departure from MIA. Does it make any difference if you shorten the stopover so that it departs MIA in August?
jridge is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 7:54 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Originally Posted by jridge
Unless I'm mistaken, "trip" would mean departure from MIA. Does it make any difference if you shorten the stopover so that it departs MIA in August?
Yes, it changed things but not in a good way. Priced out another set of dates keeping fare rules in mind...

08.08 to 09.07 (same route)
$958

08.08 to 08.27 to 09.07
$1165
Not only the price was changed, ITA forced a different route. My argument was "aa lax aa" so only one layover at LAX between ORD and MIA. But ITA gave me 2-stops LAX and LAS. LAX layover was 60+hrs.
Note outbound leg(s) are on weekend but fare basis has no Mon-Thru travel restriction on that component.

This is driving me bonkers!!

PS - This is not a problem using ITA. But I don't think ITA is being very accurate between a R/t vs multi-city for same dates and same origin/destination points.

Last edited by carsnoceans; Apr 21, 2015 at 10:22 pm
carsnoceans is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 9:15 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: used to be PER, now it's nowhere/eveywhere
Programs: QFF NB, AA GLD
Posts: 3,467
You might find more expert advice in the ita-specific thread http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milea...tures-ita.html

Last edited by pandaperth; Apr 21, 2015 at 9:28 pm
pandaperth is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 3:09 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: OW Emerald
Posts: 1,452
Originally Posted by carsnoceans
08.08 to 08.27 to 09.07
$1165
Not only the price was changed, ITA forced a different route. My argument was "aa lax aa" so only one layover at LAX between ORD and MIA. But ITA gave me 2-stops LAX and LAS. LAX layover was 60+hrs.
Note outbound leg(s) are on weekend but fare basis has no Mon-Thru travel restriction on that component.
There is different availability on the domestic segments if you search ORD-LAX-MIA or ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU, which is not unusual. Specifically, there is nothing in Q on ORD-LAX-MIA on 8/8. The above price showed fare basis NLX23GQ1. It seems to me your problem is not so much the fare rules as the availability.
jridge is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 11:59 am
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Originally Posted by jridge
There is different availability on the domestic segments if you search ORD-LAX-MIA or ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU, which is not unusual.
I don't understand. Why is the availability going to be different for ORD-LAX-MIA vs ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU?

I, too, think availability is the culprit here. But then it's ITA that's screwing up. It is pricing in Q fare whereas it should be looking up N or S (whatever is available).
carsnoceans is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 12:04 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 6,424
Originally Posted by carsnoceans
I don't understand. Why is the availability going to be different for ORD-LAX-MIA vs ORD-LAX-MIA-GRU?

I, too, think availability is the culprit here. But then it's ITA that's screwing up. It is pricing in Q fare whereas it should be looking up N or S (whatever is available).
Married segments. You are buying a fare from ORD-GRU so there has be availability for the exact routing for the fare to work; otherwise it gets broken up into parts. This is what your are seeing.

AA 1243 0 ORD
08/13/15 7:10 AM LAX
08/13/15 9:45 AM 738
Su,M,T,W,Th,F
78% / 40m F7 P6 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0

AA 1297 0 LAX
08/13/15 10:45 AM MIA
08/13/15 7:10 PM 738
Daily
NA / NA F7 P3 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0

AA 929 0 MIA
08/13/15 9:50 PM GRU
08/14/15 7:15 AM 77W
Su,T,W,Th,Sa
62% / 42m F7 P2 A0 J7 R7 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O1 Q0
See if this works:
AA 1243 0 ORD
08/13/15 7:10 AM LAX
08/13/15 9:45 AM 738
Su,M,T,W,Th,F
78% / 40m F7 P6 A7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2

AA 252 0 LAX
08/13/15 2:00 PM MIA
08/13/15 10:07 PM 777
Daily
78% / 11m F7 P7 A7 J7 R0 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2

AA 995 0 MIA
08/14/15 12:01 AM GRU
08/14/15 9:25 AM 77W
Su,M,Th,F,Sa
66% / 86m F7 P7 A7 J7 R7 D7 I7 Y7 B7 H7 K7 M7 G7 L7 V7 S7 N7 O3 Q2
If it does put it on hold and call web services to add the stopover.
skunker is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 12:35 pm
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Originally Posted by skunker
Married segments. You are buying a fare from ORD-GRU so there has be availability for the exact routing for the fare to work; otherwise it gets broken up into parts. This is what your are seeing.



See if this works:

If it does put it on hold and call web services to add the stopover.
I see. Didn't know international trips were booked as married segments.

Would stopover have to be part of the same inventory?
carsnoceans is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 2:37 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 6,424
Originally Posted by carsnoceans
I see. Didn't know international trips were booked as married segments.

Would stopover have to be part of the same inventory?
Yes, QR is really bad about them. Yes, same inventory. Put a non-stopover routing on hold and call web services, they should be able to help.
skunker is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 6:03 pm
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Originally Posted by skunker
Yes, QR is really bad about them. Yes, same inventory. Put a non-stopover routing on hold and call web services, they should be able to help.
I am guessing QR is not referring to Qatar.

What does it stand for in this context?
carsnoceans is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.