An article for us all
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 2,085
An article for us all
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/fligh...r-reband_x.htm
An article representing both sides of the fight!
An article representing both sides of the fight!
#3
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PHX/SFO/LAX
Programs: AA-EXP (1.7MM), BA-Slvr, HH-Diamond
Posts: 7,784
While US Airways is more well known domestically and globally, it doesn't have a great brand reputation...
Last edited by ByrdluvsAWACO; May 19, 2005 at 1:17 pm
#5
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 1,932
From the article:
I wonder if Mr Trout could suggest a marketing company capable of taking on the rebranding challenge? Hmm, maybe Trout & Partners!
A campaign for "The NEW Us Airways" would be just as effective (if not more so), and much cheaper.
"My vote would be rebranding" the merged airline with a new name, said Jack Trout, president of Old Greenwich, Conn.-based Trout & Partners. "Why bring along the baggage? US Airways has got a terrible reputation."
A campaign for "The NEW Us Airways" would be just as effective (if not more so), and much cheaper.
#6
Moderator: American AAdvantage & Marriott Bonvoy
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PHX
Programs: American ExPlat; Marriott/SPG Lifetime Plat; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 8,116
Originally Posted by Aspirapolvere
Continental used to be called "Cancellation" Airlines, so a turnaround can happen.
US is a brand with strong familiarity and recognition across North America and some other parts of the world. If this deal is completed and the integration handled appropriately, it can bring about a re-birthing of US of the same magnitude of CO.
I think this is a key point: In branding, awareness and perception are two different things. It is often more practical to change a perception over time via improved performance and some good PR, than it is to start over. Creating awareness of a new brand is a much more expensive proposition. The costs associated with creating an entirely new brand and then gaining the requisite level of national recognition would be ridiculous for US/HP to undertake in the current environment. The overall value associated with the current brand isn't all that bad. The negative perceptions are associated with issues like bad service quality, lost baggage and timliness of operations. Those can be turned around over the course of a year. It's not as though the reputation is unsalvagable, as it might be following some serious safety issues, plane crashes or other problems that the public might consider insurmountable or not worth the risk of giving the company another shot.
While the US reputation is soiled now, people will give them some time to turn things around. And when they do, perceptions will improve, just as they did with CO, and as they have with HP. Assuming they do some things right and this happens, they'll once again have a solid reputation, combined with a well known, long established brand. That is why this route makes much more sense than starting over.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by Aspirapolvere
Continental used to be called "Cancellation" Airlines, so a turnaround can happen.