Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AZ vs LH Italia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2010, 12:41 pm
  #61  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Italy 90% - Rest of the World 10%
Programs: Marriott + Hilton. Fly BA and AZ
Posts: 2,912
Originally Posted by blumage
How can AZ compete with the likes of Thai,Cathay or Singapore?
Point taken and truth be told at the moment they simply can't BUT

in the future they must consider

- routing
- timetable (for all three destinations)
- J offering and J prices (CX and SQ often very very expensive ex Italy)
- business partnerships
- load factors
etc etc etc etc

SQ is probably the hardest to tackle but in the good old days AZ were plying the BKK / SIN routing.....
terminalfive is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2010, 4:25 am
  #62  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy/Belgium
Programs: AAdvantage, M & More, BA exec club, Goldpointsplus,Priority Club, A-club, SPG, Marriott Rewards
Posts: 52
Thai, Cathay Pacific, Singapore Airlines, ... are in a league of their own.
Incredibly good service and modern fleets.
BUT, to be fair to AZ, no European airline can really compete with these carriers on "fair terms", not even BA, AF or LH.

Cathay, SQ, ... "enjoy" lower costs (wages), there are no unions to "annoy" the company and what about pension schemes ?

Last edited by philitalia; Jun 22, 2010 at 5:25 am
philitalia is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2010, 6:39 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 197
To be honest, I have to admit AZ's new business-class seat will be much better than many other European competitors' ones. Perhaps AZ will lack in many other aspects, but the seat will be OK.
janmnastami is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2010, 8:18 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 7th planet on your right
Programs: BA[G], SQ[G], TK[G], DL[PM], EY[G], AF[S], IC[Amb], HH[G]
Posts: 1,641
janmnastami, yes the new hardware product seem to be better than others (maybe only BA can compare)... but how many planes and how many destination will be fitted that way? This is the question, and also the one about the service...
paffendorf is offline  
Old Jun 23, 2010, 3:59 am
  #65  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Programs: ITA Executive for life; AZ CFP "per sempre" (ST E+); LH SEN; BA Bronze
Posts: 1,948
Originally Posted by paffendorf
janmnastami, yes the new hardware product seem to be better than others (maybe only BA can compare)... but how many planes and how many destination will be fitted that way? This is the question, and also the one about the service...
Well, for now 2 planes flying to JFK and NRT.
raistlin is offline  
Old Jun 23, 2010, 5:05 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Programs: AZ FA+ - AmeX Plat - Starwood Gold - Hilton Silver - Avis Preferred - Hertz Gold
Posts: 262
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8900/5.0.0.509 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/132)

Originally Posted by raistlin
Originally Posted by paffendorf
janmnastami, yes the new hardware product seem to be better than others (maybe only BA can compare)... but how many planes and how many destination will be fitted that way? This is the question, and also the one about the service...
Well, for now 2 planes flying to JFK and NRT.
777 will be retroffited as well.
Zazza is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2010, 4:35 pm
  #67  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Italy 90% - Rest of the World 10%
Programs: Marriott + Hilton. Fly BA and AZ
Posts: 2,912
Originally Posted by janmnastami
To be honest, I have to admit AZ's new business-class seat will be much better than many other European competitors' ones. Perhaps AZ will lack in many other aspects, but the seat will be OK.
AZ will have a decent J product - forward facing
AZ remain generous on mileage (x 3 bonus in J) - fairly easy to become TOP TIER with MM / skyteam if flying on long haul..
Punctuality is great at the moment

Not all that bad
terminalfive is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2010, 11:05 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: FRA
Programs: BA Gold, LH FTL, TK Elite, HH Dia
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by janmnastami
Technically, also LIN isn't in Milan: it's in Segrate

LIN is in Milan with some areas of the airport belonging to Segrate and some others to Peschiera Borromeo.
Air Traffic Controller is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2010, 11:13 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 197
Originally Posted by Air Traffic Controller
LIN is in Milan with some areas of the airport belonging to Segrate and some others to Peschiera Borromeo.
I could change the sentence and write "LIN is in Segrate and Peschiera Borromeo with some areas of the airport belonging to Milan".

The address of the airport say it's in Segrate, but I'm sure you're right about some areas being in Milan.
janmnastami is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2010, 11:23 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: FRA
Programs: BA Gold, LH FTL, TK Elite, HH Dia
Posts: 24
I have found five pages of discussions about parkings, highways, freeways, tangenziali, circular roads, city roads, bicicle paths, plus discussions about train schedule and hotels in MXP and finally disquisition regarding the totally unuseful SEAMI card but nobody is pointing at the most important thing about MXP: the serious technical problems of the airport (most of them hidden to the passengers). Here only some examples from the ATC point of view: MXP is unable for segregated operations because the 2 runways are too much close, allowed only dependant parallel apchs, confusing SIDs, conflicting STARs, strange noise abatment procedures and so on. The airport is old after only 12 years from the opening and is unable for any future expansion: MXP is a total mess also on the flight operations. LIN with only a single runway wins hands down from the ATC management.
Air Traffic Controller is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2010, 11:33 am
  #71  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: FRA
Programs: BA Gold, LH FTL, TK Elite, HH Dia
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by janmnastami
I could change the sentence and write "LIN is in Segrate and Peschiera Borromeo with some areas of the airport belonging to Milan".

The address of the airport say it's in Segrate, but I'm sure you're right about some areas being in Milan.
LIN has its own postal address that is:

20090 Linate Aeroporto.

It shares the same postal code of Segrate (20090) but this particular postal code is shared also with some other places far away from the airport (Assago, Buccinasco, Cesano Boscone, Cusago and many others).
To give you an example the runway lies in Milan but the TDZ is in Peschiera Borromeo, the GA terminal is in Milan, the cargo area is in Peschiera Borromeo. Covered parkings are in Segrate. The main terminal is shared between Milano and Segrate. Anyway this partition is quite messy....

Last edited by Air Traffic Controller; Jun 25, 2010 at 11:40 am Reason: grammar
Air Traffic Controller is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2010, 11:44 am
  #72  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 197
Originally Posted by Air Traffic Controller
Here only some examples from the ATC point of view: MXP is unable for segregated operations because the 2 runways are too much close, allowed only dependant parallel apchs
With the third runway, independent approachs will be possible. There are some videos on youtube showing that simultaneous take-offs are possible:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_alLJA0nbME

strange noise abatment procedures and so on
Are you referring to the D'Alema decree?

The airport ... is unable for any future expansion
Totally false. A third runway, the third part of T1 and satellite C, a new satellite in the middle of the two runways, isn't that expansion?



LIN with only a single runway wins hands down from the ATC management.
It's obvious, LIN is restricted to 18 movements/hour.
janmnastami is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2010, 11:49 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 197
Originally Posted by Air Traffic Controller
LIN has its own postal address that is:

20090 Linate Aeroporto.

It shares the same postal code of Segrate (20090) but this particular postal code is shared also with some other places far away from the airport (Assago, Buccinasco, Cesano Boscone, Cusago and many others).
To give you an example the runway lies in Milan but the TDZ is in Peschiera Borromeo, the GA terminal is in Milan, the cargo area is in Peschiera Borromeo. Covered parkings are in Segrate. The main terminal is shared between Milano and Segrate. Anyway this partition is quite messy....
Exactly, I believe that the entrance of the terminal and the offices are located in Segrate, so this is the reason of the address of SEA:

Società per Azioni Esercizi Aeroportuali S.E.A.
Aeroporto Milano Linate
20090 Segrate (Milano)
janmnastami is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2010, 11:57 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: FRA
Programs: BA Gold, LH FTL, TK Elite, HH Dia
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by janmnastami
With the third runway, independent approachs will be possible. There are some videos on youtube showing that simultaneous take-offs are possible:




Totally false. A third runway, the third part of T1 and satellite C, a new satellite in the middle of the two runways, isn't that expansion?














Lucky you young man..... hope one day you could see all these things....
Air Traffic Controller is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2010, 11:59 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 197
Originally Posted by Air Traffic Controller
Lucky you young man..... hope one day you could see all these things....
Perhaps in 100-150 years...
janmnastami is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.