Did Alaska Airline flight disruption obligations?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2019
Programs: Air Canada, Alaska Airline, Delta Airline, British Air
Posts: 38
Did Alaska Airline flight disruption obligations?
I purchased a main cabin ticket from Vancouver to JFK via Seattle to position for first class Alaska reward ticket on JAL from JFK to Tokyo.
I bought a ticket on a red eye knowing that my departure prior to 8pm would allow me to clear customs in Vancouver, and head directly lounge for a shower and breakfastat JFK.
My flght was to depart at 6pm and I had booked window seats and checked in prior to arrival at airport.
At the Alaska counter I was told flight would be delayed by a couple of hours. I asked what caused the delay and the agent said she did not know. (?)
I pointed out that there was an Air Canada flight departing Yvr for Seattle within 15 minutes of the flight I was meant to be on and asked if I could be put on it. This would allow me to clear customs and proceed to a lounge for a glass of wine and dinner before my flight to Seattle.
I was told "NO"" and given no further explanation as to why I was refused the Air Canada flight.
I was told I was now booked to fly Jetblue direct from Yvr to JFK departing just before midnight.
I asked about the points I should earn from my purchased flight and was told to take it up with customer service. I asked about food voucher for having to wait airside ntil Jetblue coounter opened at 9pm and was told no.
No clearing customs, no lounge time, and more than 6 hours wait landslide before Jetblue check in opened.
Checking in with Jetblue I was assigned a middle seat and told must pay $48 to check my bag, (which would have been free as I have an Alaska affiliatd credit card).
I did arrive as originally scheduled at JFK at 6am, but instead of proceeding to the lounge for a shower and breakfast I stood in line for more than 2 hours to clear customs and immigration.
A very unpleasant start to my trip, but suspect Alaska Airlines met their obligation to get me to my final destination and will have to refund me the cost of my checked bag and credit me some points...
Am I correct on this, or ought they to have put me on the flight that would Ave caused the least disruption to me?
I bought a ticket on a red eye knowing that my departure prior to 8pm would allow me to clear customs in Vancouver, and head directly lounge for a shower and breakfastat JFK.
My flght was to depart at 6pm and I had booked window seats and checked in prior to arrival at airport.
At the Alaska counter I was told flight would be delayed by a couple of hours. I asked what caused the delay and the agent said she did not know. (?)
I pointed out that there was an Air Canada flight departing Yvr for Seattle within 15 minutes of the flight I was meant to be on and asked if I could be put on it. This would allow me to clear customs and proceed to a lounge for a glass of wine and dinner before my flight to Seattle.
I was told "NO"" and given no further explanation as to why I was refused the Air Canada flight.
I was told I was now booked to fly Jetblue direct from Yvr to JFK departing just before midnight.
I asked about the points I should earn from my purchased flight and was told to take it up with customer service. I asked about food voucher for having to wait airside ntil Jetblue coounter opened at 9pm and was told no.
No clearing customs, no lounge time, and more than 6 hours wait landslide before Jetblue check in opened.
Checking in with Jetblue I was assigned a middle seat and told must pay $48 to check my bag, (which would have been free as I have an Alaska affiliatd credit card).
I did arrive as originally scheduled at JFK at 6am, but instead of proceeding to the lounge for a shower and breakfast I stood in line for more than 2 hours to clear customs and immigration.
A very unpleasant start to my trip, but suspect Alaska Airlines met their obligation to get me to my final destination and will have to refund me the cost of my checked bag and credit me some points...
Am I correct on this, or ought they to have put me on the flight that would Ave caused the least disruption to me?
Last edited by Woaca; Apr 5, 2023 at 6:19 am
#2
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,967
You are correct that they met their obligations to get you to your destination. Baggage fees will be reimbursed and you can claim original route credit for miles. Everything else while not a good experience is just part of travel.
AC isn’t an Alaska partner or oneworld airline so very unlikely they will put you on them for such a short delay. JetBlue isn’t either but maybe it was easier since they have a tie up with American.
AC isn’t an Alaska partner or oneworld airline so very unlikely they will put you on them for such a short delay. JetBlue isn’t either but maybe it was easier since they have a tie up with American.
#3
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SFO, mostly
Posts: 2,204
You are correct that they met their obligations to get you to your destination. Baggage fees will be reimbursed and you can claim original route credit for miles. Everything else while not a good experience is just part of travel.
AC isn’t an Alaska partner or oneworld airline so very unlikely they will put you on them for such a short delay. JetBlue isn’t either but maybe it was easier since they have a tie up with American.
AC isn’t an Alaska partner or oneworld airline so very unlikely they will put you on them for such a short delay. JetBlue isn’t either but maybe it was easier since they have a tie up with American.
Last edited by sltlyamusd; Apr 5, 2023 at 8:27 am
#4
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
Canadian Air Passenger Protection Regulations
The delay may be short but does that cause a misconnect downstream?
Regardless, AS has an obligation to get you to your destination in the class of service purchased even if that means purchasing a seat on a competitor for you.
James
#5
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
AS had a mechanical issue in January and put us on DL SEA-JFK. What was surprising about that flthat was how low the load factor was; abot 60 pax total while AS was pretty much sold out on all their flights that day.
James
#6
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: SFO
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100k, UA Silver, AC P25k, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 863
The issue here is about the REASON for the delay. If the weather was to blame or ATC...then actually nothing should have been due. (highly recommend expertflyer to get the real reason you are late and do your homework!)
In terms of CA regs for compensation....fat chance....i have clear documentation with AC on mechanicals, etc and they flatly just stated a different reason and said pound sand.....i suspect AS would do the same....this law has real no teeth versus the EU regs......
But it sounds like the OP had actually got a better routing (albeit in middle seat) and arrived the same time. Id say thats OK. get the refund....get the original routing credit.....move on. I agree this is part of travel.....you could have been forced to wait for the AS connection to SEA, miss the red eye, miss the award.....and due to weather....got nothing but having to pay for the hotel in SEATAC too.....trust me....i had to deal with AC meltdown from 23-25 DEC this year which was in the realm of WN issues.....i had to pay for everything myself and Christmas no less in YYZ....i used vouchers....so no CC coverage! my mistake should have covered a portion to trigger insurance....oh well....this is part of travel....
In terms of CA regs for compensation....fat chance....i have clear documentation with AC on mechanicals, etc and they flatly just stated a different reason and said pound sand.....i suspect AS would do the same....this law has real no teeth versus the EU regs......
But it sounds like the OP had actually got a better routing (albeit in middle seat) and arrived the same time. Id say thats OK. get the refund....get the original routing credit.....move on. I agree this is part of travel.....you could have been forced to wait for the AS connection to SEA, miss the red eye, miss the award.....and due to weather....got nothing but having to pay for the hotel in SEATAC too.....trust me....i had to deal with AC meltdown from 23-25 DEC this year which was in the realm of WN issues.....i had to pay for everything myself and Christmas no less in YYZ....i used vouchers....so no CC coverage! my mistake should have covered a portion to trigger insurance....oh well....this is part of travel....
#7
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951
AS has most certainly not met their obligations arriving at or departing from a Canadian Airport. They are further obligated under the Canadian Transportation Agency.
Canadian Air Passenger Protection Regulations
AS has an interline baggage & ticketing agreement with AC. AS can most certainly put you on an AC flight. I have two awards in July with AC segments.
The delay may be short but does that cause a misconnect downstream?
Regardless, AS has an obligation to get you to your destination in the class of service purchased even if that means purchasing a seat on a competitor for you.
James
Canadian Air Passenger Protection Regulations
AS has an interline baggage & ticketing agreement with AC. AS can most certainly put you on an AC flight. I have two awards in July with AC segments.
The delay may be short but does that cause a misconnect downstream?
Regardless, AS has an obligation to get you to your destination in the class of service purchased even if that means purchasing a seat on a competitor for you.
James
Not getting a shower or a drink in the lounge is not grounds for compensation. Honestly, I think AS did a great job here, getting the OP on a better routing and to their destination on time.
Last edited by ashill; Apr 5, 2023 at 10:36 am
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,847
How did you end up with those segments? Did a schedule change occur and AS agreed to fix it by booking you on AC? And they can do that on an award ticket (putting a revenue segment into an award)?
#9
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,967
There was no delay. OP was moved from a one stop routing to a nonstop and arrived at the originally scheduled time. No compensation due except for the checked bag fee.
Not getting a shower or a drink in the lounge is not grounds for compensation. Honestly, I think AS did a great job here, getting the OP on a better routing and to their destination on time.
Not getting a shower or a drink in the lounge is not grounds for compensation. Honestly, I think AS did a great job here, getting the OP on a better routing and to their destination on time.
#10
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,967
AS has most certainly not met their obligations arriving at or departing from a Canadian Airport. They are further obligated under the Canadian Transportation Agency.
Canadian Air Passenger Protection Regulations
AS has an interline baggage & ticketing agreement with AC. AS can most certainly put you on an AC flight. I have two awards in July with AC segments.
The delay may be short but does that cause a misconnect downstream?
Regardless, AS has an obligation to get you to your destination in the class of service purchased even if that means purchasing a seat on a competitor for you.
James
Canadian Air Passenger Protection Regulations
AS has an interline baggage & ticketing agreement with AC. AS can most certainly put you on an AC flight. I have two awards in July with AC segments.
The delay may be short but does that cause a misconnect downstream?
Regardless, AS has an obligation to get you to your destination in the class of service purchased even if that means purchasing a seat on a competitor for you.
James
Edit: I guess AS should have provided some food / drink voucher since departure delay over 2 hours. In these cases I would just buy the items and write in for compensation later. Airport staff are poorly trained. But CC delay cover may also pick it up.
Last edited by olouie; Apr 5, 2023 at 3:19 pm
#11
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
AS got OP to destination on time. There is no regulation mandating them to buy a competitor ticket to the connecting airport. OP got to final destination on time in same class of service on JetBlue. How does that not meet their obligations?
Edit: I guess AS should have provided some food / drink voucher since departure delay over 2 hours. In these cases I would just buy the items and write in for compensation later. Airport staff are poorly trained. But CC delay cover may also pick it up.
Edit: I guess AS should have provided some food / drink voucher since departure delay over 2 hours. In these cases I would just buy the items and write in for compensation later. Airport staff are poorly trained. But CC delay cover may also pick it up.
I suggest you read the regulations again. Even if the pax accepts the reaccommodation, there is still a financial obligation for the inconvenience.
The OP didn't mention weather; that, of course, changes a few things. It was likely they canceled the 6:00 pm departure and the 8:30 departure would have caused a misconnect even if not meeting the MCT. They did put the OP on B6 but with a six hour departure delay. Duty of care doesn't go away if you arrive at the same time. In that regard, AS failed to meet their obligation. .
James
#12
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
We also have a return on a revenue ticket, AA marketed, YLW-SEA-DFW-LHR-MXP, that has gone through 4 changes and now missing the YLW-SEA segment. When I called AA, their first offer was J on AC YLW-YYZ-JFK connecting to AA's JFK-MXP. Terrible timing and I don't want to deal with ORC. Still mulling.
Airlines have a lot of flexibility to do a lot of things, AS included. Whether or not they will is a different story. When I called AS they were very much aware of their obligations for the Canadian origins & destinations. Had I not had a stopover in SEA, AS would be responsible for a hotel night too.
James
#13
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951
You edit says it all. AS failed to provide the OP what was due.
I suggest you read the regulations again. Even if the pax accepts the reaccommodation, there is still a financial obligation for the inconvenience.
The OP didn't mention weather; that, of course, changes a few things. It was likely they canceled the 6:00 pm departure and the 8:30 departure would have caused a misconnect even if not meeting the MCT. They did put the OP on B6 but with a six hour departure delay. Duty of care doesn't go away if you arrive at the same time. In that regard, AS failed to meet their obligation. .
James
I suggest you read the regulations again. Even if the pax accepts the reaccommodation, there is still a financial obligation for the inconvenience.
The OP didn't mention weather; that, of course, changes a few things. It was likely they canceled the 6:00 pm departure and the 8:30 departure would have caused a misconnect even if not meeting the MCT. They did put the OP on B6 but with a six hour departure delay. Duty of care doesn't go away if you arrive at the same time. In that regard, AS failed to meet their obligation. .
James
That’s the rule and AS needs to follow it. That said, in practice, what’s the difference between waiting a few hours at the YVR origin instead of the SEA connection? Have to get food either way. I think an argument like “I have lounge access at SEA but not YVR” isn’t likely to go far with airlines, regulators, or my personal sense of justice.
It really seems to me like AS did right by the OP, perhaps motivated by Canadian consumer protection laws (the best outcome of regulations!). This is just not something I can get worked up about.
(I am very worked up about the consecutive trips on which WS and AC caused me >24 hour delays which they said at the time, documented by ExpertFlyer screenshots I took, were staffing and maintenance related but then weaseled out of the $1000 cash per passenger they owe. My complaints for both are in the 18 month complaint queue with the CTA. Arriving at destination on time in a non-ideal manner is a completely different deal, which isn’t to say the OP shouldn’t claim the $65 they’re owed.)
#14
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ANC
Programs: AS MVP, Club 49, Global Entry, National Emerald Club, Hilton Silver
Posts: 1,400
All these replies and not one person has asked the obvious question. Why would someone fly from the PNW to the east coast just to turn around, and fly the same distance back on your way to Tokyo? YVR or SEA-NRT direct is 10 hours takeoff touchdown! I’d prefer that routing (even in Y) than a redeye coach seat only to take a long haul J seat after flying all night.
#15
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,967
OK, so it sounds like AS owes the OP a $15 meal voucher or something like that in addition to the $48 checked bag fee.
That’s the rule and AS needs to follow it. That said, in practice, what’s the difference between waiting a few hours at the YVR origin instead of the SEA connection? Have to get food either way. I think an argument like “I have lounge access at SEA but not YVR” isn’t likely to go far with airlines, regulators, or my personal sense of justice.
It really seems to me like AS did right by the OP, perhaps motivated by Canadian consumer protection laws (the best outcome of regulations!). This is just not something I can get worked up about.
(I am very worked up about the consecutive trips on which WS and AC caused me >24 hour delays which they said at the time, documented by ExpertFlyer screenshots I took, were staffing and maintenance related but then weaseled out of the $1000 cash per passenger they owe. My complaints for both are in the 18 month complaint queue with the CTA. Arriving at destination on time in a non-ideal manner is a completely different deal, which isn’t to say the OP shouldn’t claim the $65 they’re owed.)
That’s the rule and AS needs to follow it. That said, in practice, what’s the difference between waiting a few hours at the YVR origin instead of the SEA connection? Have to get food either way. I think an argument like “I have lounge access at SEA but not YVR” isn’t likely to go far with airlines, regulators, or my personal sense of justice.
It really seems to me like AS did right by the OP, perhaps motivated by Canadian consumer protection laws (the best outcome of regulations!). This is just not something I can get worked up about.
(I am very worked up about the consecutive trips on which WS and AC caused me >24 hour delays which they said at the time, documented by ExpertFlyer screenshots I took, were staffing and maintenance related but then weaseled out of the $1000 cash per passenger they owe. My complaints for both are in the 18 month complaint queue with the CTA. Arriving at destination on time in a non-ideal manner is a completely different deal, which isn’t to say the OP shouldn’t claim the $65 they’re owed.)
I’ve been waiting almost 2 years now for a refund due by AC when they cancelled a flight. CTA pretty much useless. Good luck getting them to care about a snack and drink,
Last edited by olouie; Apr 5, 2023 at 9:03 pm