American's April 3rd moves will hurt AS flyers (booked thru travel agents/corporate)
#16
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Programs: Costco Club
Posts: 1,155
The TA industry is akin to print journalism....it's going the way of the dodo.... some print journalism (like NY Times) shifted and adjusted but most bit the dust... TA industry in my (uneducated) opinion will be a shell of its former self sooner than later. UA is on NDC now too.
#17
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951
The point remains that up to now AA is not concerned. It is not like there are a ton of choices for Alaskans either—which is why you have to book people on multiple carriers to get to their final destination. This adds liability for IRROPS and potentially lost baggage which the airline does not want. May some passengers be inconvenienced? Sure— but AA obviously feels they won’t be impacted negatively by the change. If they are, as most businesses do when reacting to falling revenue, they will attempt to course correct. If they gain as a result of the changes, expect to spend more of your resources dealing with frustrated customers—who are likely to also blame the travel agent which to the passenger is
seen as providing worse service than before.
Another win for AA and their quest for control of the bookings when passengers just choose to book directly.
seen as providing worse service than before.
Another win for AA and their quest for control of the bookings when passengers just choose to book directly.
The TA industry is akin to print journalism....it's going the way of the dodo.... some print journalism (like NY Times) shifted and adjusted but most bit the dust... TA industry in my (uneducated) opinion will be a shell of its former self sooner than later. UA is on NDC now too.
And as others have mentioned, corporate travel agencies managing travel to ensure policy compliance are definitely not going anywhere.
#18
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,125
The TA industry could be completely going the way of the dodo. However, airlines’ decisions to prohibit end-on-end ticketing in order to fully control the booking process unnecessarily keeps travel agents more relevant than they need to be. The scenario described by the OP is a place where a good travel agent remains relevant. This will be even more so for me now that AS, after 25 years as the only US carrier in my home airport, has cut service to winter only, so I have no choice but to combine carriers, almost always on different tickets because AA is now so restrictive on ticketing interline itineraries, if I want to fly any oneworld carrier.
And as others have mentioned, corporate travel agencies managing travel to ensure policy compliance are definitely not going anywhere.
And as others have mentioned, corporate travel agencies managing travel to ensure policy compliance are definitely not going anywhere.
In the last few years AS has gotten my business 2 or 3 times a year because of that (connecting to AC, WS, BR and DE). Frustringly UA won't even allow end-on-end ticketing with AC so their agreement only works on itineraries with code shares or a through fare.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,643
The TA industry is akin to print journalism....it's going the way of the dodo.... some print journalism (like NY Times) shifted and adjusted but most bit the dust... TA industry in my (uneducated) opinion will be a shell of its former self sooner than later. UA is on NDC now too.
But back to the issue at hand - we'll have to wait and see how this affects the relationship with AA, and that primarily rests with what availability AA "gives" AS in the seat/fare bucket department, or what code sharing exists so that AS is the ticketing/marketing carrier.
For the TA, it adds unwieldy steps to adequately serve his clients. It will make it much like TAs used to do to sell WN seats. Big difference being is that WN doesn't have complicated, multi-carrier, international itineraries.
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,598
My corporate TAs are great in IRROPS- they’ve saved me many times over the past 25 years. We do have various policies that they ensure compliance with, but we’re very schedule driven and they make it easy to get exceptions when I need them. But their ability to fix things with a short phone call is really where they excel, and really keeps my travel stress low.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,643
My corporate TAs are great in IRROPS- they’ve saved me many times over the past 25 years. We do have various policies that they ensure compliance with, but we’re very schedule driven and they make it easy to get exceptions when I need them. But their ability to fix things with a short phone call is really where they excel, and really keeps my travel stress low.
#22
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: Mileageplus
Posts: 245
So just priced out a routing we sell a LOT of - Juneau to Ft Lauderdale.
In the GUI, which does American NDC - and its simply us putting in an "ORDER", not building a reservation we can manage/update/change/help with IRROPS - is $406.
Sabre GDS (Red) prices the itinerary at $600 and change.
The agent GUI environment (overlay that pulls data from Sabre) - which is what 95% of all travel agents now use (very very few of us GDS dinosaurs left) - $1000.
In the GUI, which does American NDC - and its simply us putting in an "ORDER", not building a reservation we can manage/update/change/help with IRROPS - is $406.
Sabre GDS (Red) prices the itinerary at $600 and change.
The agent GUI environment (overlay that pulls data from Sabre) - which is what 95% of all travel agents now use (very very few of us GDS dinosaurs left) - $1000.
you can find the IATA video from 2015 on a google search. “IATA NDC interline”.
Seems like AA has no interest in using this feature.
#23
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2001
Programs: Alaska Tanzanite 100K
Posts: 3,858
Hi. I’m curious if the “offer” from NDC was tariff based or not. Plus, NDC was supposed to facilitate interline bookings. But each carrier decides how they want to use it based on what we heard in the discussion groups we had with IATA.
you can find the IATA video from 2015 on a google search. “IATA NDC interline”.
Seems like AA has no interest in using this feature.
you can find the IATA video from 2015 on a google search. “IATA NDC interline”.
Seems like AA has no interest in using this feature.
#24
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: AS; Hyatt Globalist; Hilton Gold; NEXUS
Posts: 979
That ship sailed 20-ish years ago. The survivors are (for the most part) those that are corporate or those that are lean and provide a high level of fee-based service for clients. The run of the mill passenger going to a TA for issuance of simple discounted airline tickets doesn't exist anymore. First, airlines capped commissions, then in most cases, eliminated them. (There remain commissions, sometimes quite substantial, on premium travel.)
I also think group travel is another niche where TAs can make a go of it, especially internationally. The number of older American couples that I see on organized tour groups for destinations like Italy and the Holy Land amazes me. Those TAs also tend to make money off of things like insurance offerings, extra profit off of single occupancy rooms... lots of opportunity for revenue there.
#25
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: Mileageplus
Posts: 245
TA’s also come in handy when trying to book international interline routing fares to destinations the airlines do not service.
Airlines still create and publish these types of fares but it really takes an agent to book them. These are a bit more complex than what the airlines own online sites are designed to handle. It’s easier to get an experienced TA to do this type of fare as airline agents are usually programmed only to respond in one area, namely where their carrier flies, not where they don’t fly (even if you point out a fare that their carrier publishes)
Airlines still create and publish these types of fares but it really takes an agent to book them. These are a bit more complex than what the airlines own online sites are designed to handle. It’s easier to get an experienced TA to do this type of fare as airline agents are usually programmed only to respond in one area, namely where their carrier flies, not where they don’t fly (even if you point out a fare that their carrier publishes)
Last edited by 1kprem; Apr 11, 2023 at 7:27 am
#26
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951
Or even domestic, such as the example in the OP, getting from airports only served by AS in Alaska or the Pacific Northwest to US destinations with no codeshare service or which necessitate long layovers that break a fare.
#27
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: Mileageplus
Posts: 245