Community
Wiki Posts
Search

End of an Era - Q400s Begin Retirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2022, 4:43 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
End of an Era - Q400s Begin Retirement

For all of us who have flown QX since the beginning, it's a sad day as they start to remove the Q400's from service. Once removed QX will be all jet for the first time in their history. The first Q400 (N441QX) was flown to VCV for disposal today, tomorrow the Milt Kuolt commemorative plane (N434MK) goes.

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...600Z/KPDX/KVCV
ddavault, Klrduks and rustykettel like this.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2022, 8:19 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS 75K, BW Plat, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 10,724
Interesting--during the last schedule change one of my SEA-PDX flights went from a E175 to a Q400....still shows me "waitlisted for first class" though...lol.
PDXPremier is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2022, 9:34 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Originally Posted by PDXPremier
Interesting--during the last schedule change one of my SEA-PDX flights went from a E175 to a Q400....still shows me "waitlisted for first class" though...lol.
That must be the Q400T with the lie flat seats!
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 7:48 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Marriott 5+ BadgeAccor Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NYC
Programs: AS MVPG, DL KM, Bee Six, Bonvoy Plat, Avis PC, Natl Exec, Greyhound Road Rewards Z"L
Posts: 16,701
What a shame. I really hope I can get on one of these before they're gone.

-J.
GW McLintock is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 9:07 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SEA
Posts: 242
How do the economics of a jet compare on SEA-PDX?

I've been on enough SEA-EUG for my fill of Q400s. Dislike the volume in the cabin, "Q" and all.
nineworldseries likes this.
StrandedinLA is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 10:12 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Originally Posted by StrandedinLA
How do the economics of a jet compare on SEA-PDX?
Some comments about the Embraer 175 from Nat Pieper, VP Fleet, Finance and Alliances
“The E175 will be the Alaska Air Group’s sole regional airliner,” Pieper says. “While the economics favor the Q400 on routes up to 350 mi., the greater efficiencies of a single fleet type—reduced spares, a better [customer] experience, and premium and first-class yields—outweigh any economic advantage of the Q400 over the E175 on short stage lengths.”

Pieper notes that the E175’s stage lengths average 471 mi., while the daily utilization rate is 8.8 hr.

The E175, Pieper explains, offers the same three-class cabin as Alaska Airlines’ Boeing 737 fleet. “The E175s have developed markets to the point of requiring the 737’s higher capacity and, at the same time, providing added frequencies in the same 737 markets,” he says.

https://aviationweek.com/special-top...e-looks-steady
GW McLintock likes this.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 10:34 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,329
They won't be missed. It was fun to fly once, but since then I've done my best to avoid these hot & stuffy cramped tubes at all costs. Jungle jets FTW!
RAD_PDX is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 12:16 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: Southwest A-List; Alaska MVPG; Hilton Diamond; Avis PreferredPlus; Marriott Bonvoy Platinum Elite
Posts: 919
Are there airports that were served by Q400s that cannot handle an E175?

I’ve ridden in plenty of Q400s. Can’t say that I’ll miss them, unless it results in lack of destinations.
ctporter likes this.
twitch76 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 12:48 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold100K, Marriott Gold, Hilton Silver
Posts: 15
"For all of us who have flown QX since the beginning..."

I still remember flying on the Q100 and Q200 aircraft (and Fokker F28 jets). Does anyone remember the middle seat in row 9 against the rear bulkhead where you had unlimited leg room down the aisle... and just prayed the drink cart didn't take out your shins?


Horizon also flew CRJ 900's for a spell. I'd take a Q400 over a CRJ any day of the week...
Klrduks and WesternCDN like this.
resqman is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 1:05 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: PDX, OGG or between the two
Programs: AS 75K
Posts: 2,865
Originally Posted by RAD_PDX
They won't be missed. It was fun to fly once, but since then I've done my best to avoid these hot & stuffy cramped tubes at all costs. Jungle jets FTW!
These are my thoughts exactly. I recently scheduled one purposely so my kids could ride on a prop plane and quickly remembered why I avoided them.
mtofell is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 1:09 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,371
Originally Posted by resqman
I still remember flying on the Q100 and Q200 aircraft (and Fokker F28 jets). Does anyone remember the middle seat in row 9 against the rear bulkhead where you had unlimited leg room down the aisle... and just prayed the drink cart didn't take out your shins?
yep, a couple -100s in the 1980s (plus a bunch of ex-QX birds in Continental Express livery to and from CLE in the 2006-2011 timeframe); also probably a dozen of the little F.28s in the late 1990s

Originally Posted by resqman
Horizon also flew CRJ 900's for a spell.
-700s for sure (I was on N216AG, LGB-PDX, Aug 2012); not sure they had the CR9s


per my log, I've been on 60 Q400 flights -- first in Aug 2003, most recent in Aug 2019 -- incl more than a few long ones (600+ miles, 2+ hours at cruise): LAX-BOI/SUN, SEA<->STS/BIL, SEA-RNO, BZN-PDX

Last edited by jrl767; Sep 8, 2022 at 1:31 pm
jrl767 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 1:17 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
Originally Posted by mtofell
These are my thoughts exactly. I recently scheduled one purposely so my kids could ride on a prop plane and quickly remembered why I avoided them.
No issue with flying a prop. Issue with how they're configured inside. I won't miss them, although I don't miss the Q200 even more!
Eastbay1K is online now  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 2:03 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold100K, Marriott Gold, Hilton Silver
Posts: 15
Originally Posted by jrl767
yep, a couple -100s in the 1980s (plus a bunch of ex-QX birds in Continental Express livery to and from CLE in the 2006-2011 timeframe); also probably a dozen of the little F.28s in the late 1990s


-700s for sure (I was on N216AG, LGB-PDX, Aug 2012); not sure they had the CR9s


per my log, I've been on 60 Q400 flights -- first in Aug 2003, most recent in Aug 2019 -- incl more than a few long ones (600+ miles, 2+ hours at cruise): LAX-BOI/SUN, SEA<->STS/BIL, SEA-RNO, BZN-PDX
You're right! It was CRJ700's, not 900's. I was a ramper for QX in Seattle from 1999-2000 when the first CRJ's came into the fleet and left the job *just* before delivery of the first Q400 (although I attended training on them). Obviously 22 years later the memory has gotten a little fuzzy. I've logged a LOT of BOI-SEA, BOI-PDX, and PDX-SEA flights on Q400's over the last 10 years as an MVP/MVPG/MVPG75K. I don't mind them (I've flown in smaller - much smaller!) but do prefer the E175.

Scary side note from that 1999-2000 time frame - I was invited on a trip to PVR with six coworkers but wasn't able to find anyone to trade my scheduled shifts with. Two of my coworkers got the last two open seats on a PVR-SEA direct flight. The other four were aboard AS261 when it crashed. For years I wouldn't fly on an MD80 series.
resqman is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 2:09 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100k - UA Premier Gold - AA Platinum Pro
Posts: 183
I, for one, am grateful that the smallest ride I will have to worry about on AS is an E175.

CRJ's and Q400's were fun once for the experience, but as someone who prefers to have the option to "move about the cabin" whenever it's necessary, bigger is better!
jimmygottfredson likes this.
ShutUpDonnie is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2022, 2:17 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: NorCal
Programs: UAMP
Posts: 81
Curious, how does this impact smaller markets like RDD-SEA?
sgtbalski is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.