Alaska First Class Baggage Fiasco 2x70lbs vs 2x50lbs
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: BNA/LAX/BWI/SZX/SIN
Posts: 649
Alaska First Class Baggage Fiasco 2x70lbs vs 2x50lbs
I had a problematic interaction with AS in paid First Class on 7 Jan JFK-LAX. It was part of a paid La Premiere Air France reservation/ticket with a 27 hour layover in New York. Nevertheless, I was entitled to baggage allowance of 2x32kg/2x70lbs as printed on the published ticket that stated JFK-LAX has 2x32KG allowance and also under IATA Resolution 302 either under the first carrier or Most Significant Carrier (MSC) rules of the ticket. On Alaska online Check-in app, the baggage page also showed that Baggage Rules will follow UL (my first carrier on the AF ticket), therefore 2x32KG. The agent I checked in with at JFK refused to check on the rules of the ticket and what the baggage rules were showing on my Alaska app insisted I paid for the overweight <32KG portion. Her argument was that all Alaska First Class tickets are 2x50lbs. As we were running close to cut-off, I paid the 70USD and decided to catch my flight.
Two things immediately occur to me. One, I had a choice between AS and DL as part of the through ticket on JFK-LAX and I chose AS because of loyalty. DL would have been easier because DL offered 2x32KG as part of international business class convention AND had a flat bed - it would also have no problems pulling up fare and baggage rules of partner tickets. Two, for all of the rhetoric behind the strength of AS' partner network, AS is incredibly out of synch with its partners - consistent baggage rules are part of any partner through-fare and even if the agents had problems accessing the tickets, AS could have easily offered 2x70 for first class to avoid being out of synch and this problem in the first place. Why be the odd one out? Even if AS offered 32kg, not every first class passenger is going to avail of it.
Moreover, the AS agents at JFK were incredibly unfriendly - and this despite providing feedback on my previous lackluster experiences at that station. I'm really disappointed and wonder what my recourse is right now.
Two things immediately occur to me. One, I had a choice between AS and DL as part of the through ticket on JFK-LAX and I chose AS because of loyalty. DL would have been easier because DL offered 2x32KG as part of international business class convention AND had a flat bed - it would also have no problems pulling up fare and baggage rules of partner tickets. Two, for all of the rhetoric behind the strength of AS' partner network, AS is incredibly out of synch with its partners - consistent baggage rules are part of any partner through-fare and even if the agents had problems accessing the tickets, AS could have easily offered 2x70 for first class to avoid being out of synch and this problem in the first place. Why be the odd one out? Even if AS offered 32kg, not every first class passenger is going to avail of it.
Moreover, the AS agents at JFK were incredibly unfriendly - and this despite providing feedback on my previous lackluster experiences at that station. I'm really disappointed and wonder what my recourse is right now.
#3
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: LAS, ZQN
Programs: UA PP (2MM), BA gold
Posts: 2,199
AS is supposed to check the booking carriers allowance as I had same on KLM with 60 lb bag. After checking on his computer he AS has 50 lb max but said fine. You need to request refund from AS first and if an issue AF. You should not pay any excess between 50 and 70 lbs.
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, HH Gold, Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium LTG, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 42,953
Ask for a refund. If tight on time, yes pay then refund.
Otherwise ask for a station supervisor or manager. Depending on the location, some have a better "understanding"
I don't think JFK sees many in your position. ANC/SEA is much more common.
Otherwise ask for a station supervisor or manager. Depending on the location, some have a better "understanding"
I don't think JFK sees many in your position. ANC/SEA is much more common.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
Maybe even an agent could read AS' own website.
Travel that includes multiple airlines or tickets
If your travel includes multiple tickets, and/or travel on more than one airline, your baggage fees and rules may be determined by the other airline. Please check your ticket, or call Alaska Airlines Reservations at 1-800-252-7522 to help determine which airline rules and fees apply to your journey.
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
1. Unless you have time, pay the fee and then seek a refund. Make certain to include your e-ticket receipt showing the segment allowance as you believe it to be.
2. If the refund does not appear, file a DOT complaint. As the destination is the US, US law applies. Do not mention IATA. It is a trade organization for air carriers and has zero impact on US legal decisions.
This is simply incompetent on the pat of AS. The DOT rule is simple and the reason for requiring that e-tickets specify the baggage allowance is to avoid complexities between carriers and having to train agents in local variation of rules. Moreover, all it took was for the AS agent to ask a supervisor or her own help desk and she would have had an answer/
There is something to be said for filing a DOT complaint even if AS refunds the fee as DOT does keep track of the metrics of complaints and will take enforcement action if AS routinely violates US law. But, life is also short and perhaps not worth your time.
2. If the refund does not appear, file a DOT complaint. As the destination is the US, US law applies. Do not mention IATA. It is a trade organization for air carriers and has zero impact on US legal decisions.
This is simply incompetent on the pat of AS. The DOT rule is simple and the reason for requiring that e-tickets specify the baggage allowance is to avoid complexities between carriers and having to train agents in local variation of rules. Moreover, all it took was for the AS agent to ask a supervisor or her own help desk and she would have had an answer/
There is something to be said for filing a DOT complaint even if AS refunds the fee as DOT does keep track of the metrics of complaints and will take enforcement action if AS routinely violates US law. But, life is also short and perhaps not worth your time.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: BNA/LAX/BWI/SZX/SIN
Posts: 649
This, yes. Alaska is almost dead to me at this point. With the "elite tax" via basic economy, reduced network and frequency, hollowed out partnerships, and increasingly disappointing ground staff at JFK and LAX where I frequent most, maybe it's time to go completely free agent.
#10
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: YVR, HNL
Programs: AS 75k, UA peon, BA Bronze, AC E50k, Marriott Plat, HH Diamond, Fairmont Plat (RIP)
Posts: 7,832
I might be wrong here but doesn’t the 27 hour “layover” mean that this is not a connection but a stopover? Does that change the equation and at the start of the onward portion, the baggage allowance would be whatever AS allows? i.e. if it was a <24 hr true connection, the AF allowance would apply but this was actually a stopover?
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,371
I believe that's accurate ... the fact that the flights were on the same ticket is irrelevant (although if the original booking was 23+59 or less, and a schedule change resulted in the 27-hour JFK transit, OP might have a better case)
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: BNA/LAX/BWI/SZX/SIN
Posts: 649
I might be wrong here but doesn’t the 27 hour “layover” mean that this is not a connection but a stopover? Does that change the equation and at the start of the onward portion, the baggage allowance would be whatever AS allows? i.e. if it was a <24 hr true connection, the AF allowance would apply but this was actually a stopover?
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
I might be wrong here but doesn’t the 27 hour “layover” mean that this is not a connection but a stopover? Does that change the equation and at the start of the onward portion, the baggage allowance would be whatever AS allows? i.e. if it was a <24 hr true connection, the AF allowance would apply but this was actually a stopover?
US law -- since 2011 -- is that, in this situation, the allowance of the marketing carrier of the first segment applies to all segments (Note: does not include waivers for status or CC's). Thus, connection vs. stopover is irrelevant. Equally important is that the e-ticket must specify the baggage allowance for each segment as well as the fee, if any, for the first and second bags.
If the marketing carrier got it wrong, then it AS may pursue that carrier (not likely), but the passenger is entitled to the stated allowance.
This DOT rule was all designed to make this simple, both for the carrier and the passenger. It is a simple IT failure at AS that the agent did not see OP's allowance on screen when the PNR was pulled up. Hardly surprising.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
The fact that the flights were on the same ticket is key, because the baggage rules are incorporated into each segment of the ticket, appearing right there on the ticket.