AA/AS Partnerhip Rumored to Be Further Gutted
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,391
Being honest, AA has never really cared about the PNW for its entire history. They maintained a large hub in SJC including service to NRT and then went on to completely dismantle it. Even bread and butter routes like SFO/LAX-MIA are getting eaten up by B6 Mint and DL/B6 have reduced AA's clout on LAX/SFO-JFK. AA has pulled out of JFK-SEA all together so not sure how much they really care about the West Coast at this point.
#18
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: Alaska Airlines
Posts: 659
Lounge partnerships almost seem to operate regardless of flight partnerships... I mean we have access to random United Lounges. I'm guessing they're run as separate business units and as long as the relationship is mutually beneficial to each entity, they'll continue.
#19
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Verdi, NV, SFO & Olympic (aka Squaw )Valley.
Programs: Ikon Pass Full + AS Gold + Marriott Titanium + Hilton Gold. Recovering UA Plat. LT lounge AA+DL+UA
Posts: 3,823
AA actually dismantled its SJC hub twice: once after the1987 AirCal acquisition and again after the 1999 Reno Air acquisition. For what it is worth, Delta now calls SJC a focus city.
#20
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: B6 Mosaic, Bonvoy LT Titanium (x SPG LT), IHG Spire, UA Silver
Posts: 5,848
Let's deal with AA/AS first AA doesn't have the financial leverage over its partners that DL has with their equity stakes and OW ties are much looser between member airlines than the other alliances so AA being dropped likely won't impact the other partners. AA seems a bit lost with their overall strategy as it is so they would be better off concentrating on coming up with their own plan rather than worrying about what its partners are doing.
#22
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: B6 Mosaic, Bonvoy LT Titanium (x SPG LT), IHG Spire, UA Silver
Posts: 5,848
"Close" is a relative term. DL/NW and AS were closer and AA had both B6 and AS in recent years. DL dropped AS, AA dropped B6, which left AS as AA's only domestic partner. Now it is looking like AS will be gone too.
#23
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: Alaska 100K - MM, defender of shoes on the carpeted bulkhead 4ever, AA LT PLT, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia
Posts: 7,446
#24
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,318
I don't want to rain on a spirited the-sky-is-falling discussion, but here's a bit of history for perspective...
Also, let's remember that AS is investigating a limited membership in oneworld.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,848
I am not convinced that current AA management is necessarily influenced by decisions made by very different management as long as four decades ago. If they perceive that it is in their (short term?) interest to modify (cull) the relationship, I have no doubt they will pursue it. Then again, I am not convinced that it is in their best interest.
#26
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,124
My first thought was... that was a different AA. Turns out CDKing had the same thought in that other thread.
I am not convinced that current AA management is necessarily influenced by decisions made by very different management as long as four decades ago. If they perceive that it is in their (short term?) interest to modify (cull) the relationship, I have no doubt they will pursue it. Then again, I am not convinced that it is in their best interest.
#27
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pacific Wonderland
Programs: ʙᴏɴᴠo̱ʏ Au, IHG Au, HH Dia, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred
Posts: 5,336
My first thought was... that was a different AA. Turns out CDKing had the same thought in that other thread.
I am not convinced that current AA management is necessarily influenced by decisions made by very different management as long as four decades ago. If they perceive that it is in their (short term?) interest to modify (cull) the relationship, I have no doubt they will pursue it. Then again, I am not convinced that it is in their best interest.
#28
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,318
My first thought was... that was a different AA. Turns out CDKing had the same thought in that other thread.
I am not convinced that current AA management is necessarily influenced by decisions made by very different management as long as four decades ago. If they perceive that it is in their (short term?) interest to modify (cull) the relationship, I have no doubt they will pursue it. Then again, I am not convinced that it is in their best interest.
I am not convinced that current AA management is necessarily influenced by decisions made by very different management as long as four decades ago. If they perceive that it is in their (short term?) interest to modify (cull) the relationship, I have no doubt they will pursue it. Then again, I am not convinced that it is in their best interest.
#29
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
#30
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951