Mea culpa: I just paid full F fare for JFK-SFO on Alaska
#46
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,856
So I just looked it up. Non-stop business from SFO to JFK for a random date in April is $700. AS $700 consistently for all times, DL, AA, B9 vary widely $700 to $1400+
If OP had just looked at a particular date/time it might have been the same price for AS and B9. But in general it is obvious AS is cheaper.
If OP had just looked at a particular date/time it might have been the same price for AS and B9. But in general it is obvious AS is cheaper.
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,391
Sure, though a merger means that the merged entity has to decide on something (and given that VX was the only airline in North America offering 60 inch pitch/etc. in F on every plane, and nobody bothered to copy them, seems to be an indicator that nobody else thinks that is a particular way to get fat stacks of cash).
But it's the umpteenth whine about pmVX going bye-bye. Sorry, it's gone.
Except, well, it's a race to the bottom on a particular set of routes. It isn't close to "the bottom" across 90% or so of the AS network.
I strongly suspect that VX wasn't collecting cheddar their last couple of years transcon given AA/UA/DL/B6 investment, the fact that AA/UA/DL own corporate buying far more than VX or AS ever will, and the fact that the pm-VX product needed a lie-flat refresh (read: AS either was going to have to lay out $$$ for a dedicated subfleet, and still get rid of pmVX F on a bunch of pmVX routes, or lay out $$$$$$$$ for a fleetwide lie-flat fleet, and totally hose anyone's chances for upgrades, and probably completely break their FPP model). I don't know it for sure but airline executives generally like making money.
I make no suggestions on that because bluntly the beancounters will do what they think will make them more money regardless of my suggestions. At present they think the FFP is a differentiating factor. That could change.
But are you saying that AS should have put pmVX F seats in all the 737s? The E75s? The Q400s? Gotten rid of upgrades fleetwide and changed their FFP to be a VX style, spend gets you a rebate model? Because that's an alternative- AS could have decided the VX F product and FFP was such an amazeballs winner it deserved to be implemented fleetwide. No more upgrades, swank F lie-flats for SFO-SAN or ANC-CDV.
(Also, LOL on Hawaii... UA's "lie-flat" F to Hawaii is 2-4-2 on 777s that got regularly ripped before Polaris. AA doesn't fly lie-flat to Hawaii out of LAX/PHX. Neither does DL out of SEA/LAX. West Coast-Hawaii is not a premium market like CA-NYC. If it was AS and WN wouldn't be in it, and DL wouldn't fly 757-300s that don't have lie-flat.)
But it's the umpteenth whine about pmVX going bye-bye. Sorry, it's gone.
I strongly suspect that VX wasn't collecting cheddar their last couple of years transcon given AA/UA/DL/B6 investment, the fact that AA/UA/DL own corporate buying far more than VX or AS ever will, and the fact that the pm-VX product needed a lie-flat refresh (read: AS either was going to have to lay out $$$ for a dedicated subfleet, and still get rid of pmVX F on a bunch of pmVX routes, or lay out $$$$$$$$ for a fleetwide lie-flat fleet, and totally hose anyone's chances for upgrades, and probably completely break their FPP model). I don't know it for sure but airline executives generally like making money.
But are you saying that AS should have put pmVX F seats in all the 737s? The E75s? The Q400s? Gotten rid of upgrades fleetwide and changed their FFP to be a VX style, spend gets you a rebate model? Because that's an alternative- AS could have decided the VX F product and FFP was such an amazeballs winner it deserved to be implemented fleetwide. No more upgrades, swank F lie-flats for SFO-SAN or ANC-CDV.
(Also, LOL on Hawaii... UA's "lie-flat" F to Hawaii is 2-4-2 on 777s that got regularly ripped before Polaris. AA doesn't fly lie-flat to Hawaii out of LAX/PHX. Neither does DL out of SEA/LAX. West Coast-Hawaii is not a premium market like CA-NYC. If it was AS and WN wouldn't be in it, and DL wouldn't fly 757-300s that don't have lie-flat.)
Last edited by eponymous_coward; Mar 13, 2019 at 6:19 pm
#48
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Rather than arguing about it, the simple fact is that F is not a uniform product and it pays to spend 2 minutes taking a look at what you are getting for $1,600 on AS vs. DL, AA, UA, DL, and B6. If people are doing the basic research and still paying that kind of money for AS, there isn't that much to be done.
The real issue is that PDB's and real food with multiple choices are not the issue. They don't cost that much. It's all about a service standard which is lacking on AS, but which still sells.
The real issue is that PDB's and real food with multiple choices are not the issue. They don't cost that much. It's all about a service standard which is lacking on AS, but which still sells.
#49
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,374
Sure it does but there is an ethical argument against charging the same price when you offer recliner seats and the entire rest of the market offers lie-flats. You're preying on the uninformed consumer.
#51
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 6,546
$650 one-way SFO-JFK for 41" domestic F is pretty reasonable if booking relatively close-in and on business traveler heavy days.
if booking in advance and with day of week flexibility, dirt cheap hidden-city flat beds eastbound to NAS/SJU and $500 flat beds westbound on Saturdays (on various airlines)
if booking in advance and with day of week flexibility, dirt cheap hidden-city flat beds eastbound to NAS/SJU and $500 flat beds westbound on Saturdays (on various airlines)
#53
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold 100K
Posts: 2,030
Wait, where are there people who get to apply GGUs?
(I presume you know there is very poor availability)
I find it right now very often I get upgraded within that 24 hour period, but prior there was no availability with GGU period. Alaska is hoping people buy those tickets. I think they should look at their data and figure out that nobody buys it at the last minute, and just let people use GGUs
(I presume you know there is very poor availability)
I find it right now very often I get upgraded within that 24 hour period, but prior there was no availability with GGU period. Alaska is hoping people buy those tickets. I think they should look at their data and figure out that nobody buys it at the last minute, and just let people use GGUs
I also stand by my original post, everyone is grumpy today!
#54
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
I value some of the perks of elite status that mileage buyers don't get. That includes same day flight changes and outright cancelling tickets, all at no charge. Can't complain about upgrades (24 in a row this year) and I'm fine not being in a reclining seat (though most of my flights have been on Airbus because they're still the dominant aircraft at SFO). I expect to requalify for 75K this year. Don't see any changes on the horizon and recall the AS CEO being quoted a few weeks ago about how their frequent flyer program balances out when you consider the wide variety of passengers in brings in, both leisure and business, low fare and high fare.
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
The complaints of the OP are reminiscent of someone who gets all the value menu items at Taco Bell and then complains about the explosive baņo visits that ensue. It isn't that we all haven't heard the same things before, and it isn't as if the OP isn't a regular FTer. I bought a transcon ticket for later this year (on a 737 product) when I saw the U space available. I know I won't be lying flat. I know I may or may not get a splash of bubbles pre-departure. I know I'll have pitch of 40-ish inches, and hopefully, there will still be a video player. I know my keppy will not be cushioned in a deluxe hotel-branded pillow. I also know that the lavish buffay in the JFK lounge will satiate me so that I'll be pondering if anorexia is setting in when I'm ready to go to the gate.
#57
Join Date: Mar 2018
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75k, Hyatt Globalist, National Executive Elite
Posts: 272
Don't think $650 on AS rev F is too much -- I use GGU and it's about $250 to $300 and I actually really enjoyed those seats on a 6-hour flight -- they are not international J's but they get the job done.
Also, if you could find similar fares on other airlines w/ flatbeds why didn't you choose those?
Also, if you could find similar fares on other airlines w/ flatbeds why didn't you choose those?
#58
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
The complaints of the OP are reminiscent of someone who gets all the value menu items at Taco Bell and then complains about the explosive baņo visits that ensue. It isn't that we all haven't heard the same things before, and it isn't as if the OP isn't a regular FTer. I bought a transcon ticket for later this year (on a 737 product) when I saw the U space available. I know I won't be lying flat. I know I may or may not get a splash of bubbles pre-departure. I know I'll have pitch of 40-ish inches, and hopefully, there will still be a video player. I know my keppy will not be cushioned in a deluxe hotel-branded pillow. I also know that the lavish buffay in the JFK lounge will satiate me so that I'll be pondering if anorexia is setting in when I'm ready to go to the gate.
#59
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951
And that is really the problem. If everyone who is in F paid for Y, then the product quickly starts to resemble Y. AS certainly isn't going to spend money on a cabin that doesn't bring in extra money. And the people getting the "upgrades" don't complain much, because, well, they were "free". And then someone (like the OP) makes the mistake of actually paying for the product and is appalled at the product that they get relative to the price that they paid.
The problem is that it's a mislabeled product. If they want to be all-economy, like Southwest, that's preferable to offering a fake first class service, and charging the same as the other carriers charge for a real one.
AS has decided that the operational complexity of a subfleet is not something that makes sense for them. That may or may not prove to be smart in the long run. But they use the same label for "first class" service as the other carriers. As you noted, AS did not in any way indicate that SFO-NYC is a route which gets a premium product on AS. Instead, "first class" on Alaska always means the same thing, and it's the same thing "first class" (or "business class") means on nearly all routes offered by the North American competition. Heck, it's the same thing that "first class" or "business class" means on domestic/short haul narrow body fligths pretty much everywhere in the world, except Europe where "business class" means a far inferior on board product (perhaps an on board product that is inferior to Southwest's coach).
AS has said that their approach to the SFO/LAX-NYC markets is to target a price point between cheapest available coach customers and people paying for the flat beds; their product reflects that. Though I don't track those markets carefully (I essentially never fly them), my understanding is that B6 has really squeezed them, driving down the price of the flat bed seats to a level where there just isn't much space between normal Y fares and J fares. So in that particular market, there isn't a lot of room for AS to have a differentiated intermediate product as they envisioned. That's a challenge for AS, but not in the way you describe.
It is certainly true that it's nuts to pay the same for AS F on the particular route you were flying as J on any of UA, DL, AA, or B6. But the Southwest comparison you make is absurd. And on any other route, I don't think there's much of a difference between AS and the big three in product. It's interesting that AS happened to be priced at the same level as the competition for your trip. I don't think anyone, including anyone at AS, would argue that paying that to fly AS was smart.
But then, I have a grand total of once in my life paid for anything but the cheapest available ticket on the flight I want (I once paid for a Y -> W upgrade on BA but wouldn't do it again; once or twice the cheapest available flight has been in F, but otherwise I've always paid for coach), so maybe I'm not the best comparison. But I do sometimes pay a bit more for a coach ticket on AS than a coach ticket on the competition (sometimes a coach ticket with a less convenient schedule), which is exactly Alaska's stated business model.
#60
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951
Lucky you to consider $650 too much for F. For my trips out of YLW, I can be in the $800 range for coach, with no hope of an upgrade on the 737 segments (I'm only MVP) and less hope on the Q400 segment!