AS at Dallas Love Field (DAL)
AS has added six daily roundtrip flights from DAL, bringing the total daily departures to 19:
PDX 3x daily (+1) SAN 2x daily (+1) SEA 4x daily (+2) SFO 4x daily (+1) SJC 3x daily (+1) This added flying begins on August 27, 2019 |
WHAT!?!?!?
LOL! Well good for them. And a Christmas present (albeit for 2019!) for me. |
Looks like a little bit of gate squatting to hold their territory at DAL, but great to see nonetheless.
|
Originally Posted by PotomacApproach
(Post 30562469)
Looks like a little bit of gate squatting to hold their territory at DAL, but great to see nonetheless.
|
Originally Posted by PotomacApproach
(Post 30562469)
Looks like a little bit of gate squatting to hold their territory at DAL, but great to see nonetheless.
As an FT armchair route planner, the additional SFO flight makes the most sense and the third daily flight to PDX is the headscratcher. I'm also surprised that there is not a fourth frequency to LAX and the new flights start in August, rather than May or June. |
Haha... they were dared by the city of Dallas to fully utilize their gates and BAM they do it... nice. I will enjoy those extra SEA flight times! Unfortunately, I have to wait until August?? :( I don't know if I will be flying there as much by then.
|
Originally Posted by dmodemd
(Post 30563128)
Haha... they were dared by the city of Dallas to fully utilize their gates and BAM they do it... nice. I will enjoy those extra SEA flight times! Unfortunately, I have to wait until August?? :( I don't know if I will be flying there as much by then.
Good for AS and DAL... although wish there was some kind of lounge there- had a multi hour delay connecting this year. |
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 30563508)
Anyone have text describing the dare?
Good for AS and DAL... although wish there was some kind of lounge there- had a multi hour delay connecting this year. |
Originally Posted by PotomacApproach
(Post 30562469)
Looks like a little bit of gate squatting to hold their territory at DAL, but great to see nonetheless.
|
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 30563508)
Anyone have text describing the dare?
A bit of history: The original deal for the 20 gates was WN got 16, UA got 2 and AA got 2. UA later allowed DL to use one its gates, then eventually subleased both gates to WN (which agreed to accommodate DL for six months), creating the current DL-WN conflict. The AA gates were subleased to VX as part of an antitrust settlement. AS inherited those gates in the VX merger.
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 30563508)
wish there was some kind of lounge there
|
Originally Posted by krazykanuck
(Post 30563535)
It's fine enough as long as you don't have to spend much time there but it is way too crowded and busy at peak times.
|
I appreciate the additional flight out of SAN as someone who needs to get to Dallas occasionally, but it feels like quite a bit of capacity between the 2 cities. Flights per day: AA - 9 (!) WN - 4 (honestly thought they had more frequencies) AS - 2 NK - 1 |
Was just at airport heading from Seattle to Orange County in C terminal on a horizon operated flight using an E75and the gate next to us was for a flight to DAL. It’s also a E75 leaving at 8:00 am. Seems to be little risk for AS to have Horizon operate a smaller added flight time. Needless to say it was full today December 22. |
Woohoo! Great Christmas present for me!! I fly PDX-DAL almost every week (though I have a break until Feb). The flights are always pretty full (though I realize that does not translate to profitability). I've been praying for a third afternoon flight. I keep hoping PDX will be the beneficiary of route cuts at other stations.
|
Originally Posted by jrl767
(Post 30563514)
unless you’re MRing, connecting hasn’t been much of an issue for the last couple months since they schwacked the DAL-DCA/LGA flights
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 30563508)
Good for AS and DAL... although wish there was some kind of lounge there- had a multi hour delay connecting this year.
|
Originally Posted by dayone
(Post 30563653)
Southwest to Dallas: Make Alaska Airlines share Love Field gates with Delta
A bit of history: The original deal for the 20 gates was WN got 16, UA got 2 and AA got 2. UA later allowed DL to use one its gates, then eventually subleased both gates to WN (which agreed to accommodate DL for six months), creating the current DL-WN conflict. The AA gates were subleased to VX as part of an antitrust settlement. AS inherited those gates in the VX merger. Bottom line, WN has the vast majority of gates and does not want to share. |
Applaud for the additional services to SFO/SJC/SAN. :D. One can only hope that AS will add new routes to east coast.
|
Originally Posted by Peterson4025
(Post 30569044)
Applaud for the additional services to SFO/SJC/SAN. :D. One can only hope that AS will add new routes to east coast.
AS just axed the east coast (DAL<—>DCA/LGA) routes they inherited from VX; WN has service to pretty much every east coast city from DAL ... where exactly are you hoping AS adds service? |
DFW would be more helpful as it connects with AA.
|
Well, this may buy AS some time. But we'll see if these new flights actually fly... 8 months is a long time. AS could be out of DAL by then, just like LGA and DCA.
The question is, which is losing more money: DAL or the SFO/LAX transcons??? |
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 30563508)
Good for AS and DAL... although wish there was some kind of lounge there- had a multi hour delay connecting this year.
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...f898cffa91.jpg |
As tempted as I was... I avoided that lounge :D
|
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 30570897)
As tempted as I was... I avoided that lounge :D
|
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 30570897)
As tempted as I was... I avoided that lounge :D
|
Originally Posted by Puppis
(Post 30562589)
19 daily departures doesn't seem like gate squatting to me. They only have two gates, so that's 9 or 10 flights per day, per gate.
|
Originally Posted by PotomacApproach
(Post 30571245)
For comparison, WN has 10 daily departures/gate at DAL, one of the highest it its entire system. 20 flights a day in/out of a 16 hour period is full capacity if not a little over.
|
Props to them for actually expanding at DAL. I for sure thought they were going in the opposite direction so this is a pleasant surprise.
|
Originally Posted by dayone
(Post 30563653)
Southwest to Dallas: Make Alaska Airlines share Love Field gates with Delta
A bit of history: The original deal for the 20 gates was WN got 16, UA got 2 and AA got 2. UA later allowed DL to use one its gates, then eventually subleased both gates to WN (which agreed to accommodate DL for six months), creating the current DL-WN conflict. The AA gates were subleased to VX as part of an antitrust settlement. AS inherited those gates in the VX merger. About nine months ago, I emailed both Priority Pass and the Aviation Department asking them to talk to each other about lounge options. |
Originally Posted by BobOscar
(Post 30574737)
Did United ever have any gates in the new terminal? The one time I flew UA in & out of DAL, they had one or two gates in the crappy old terminal. It was a pain to get to and from. I believe that DL was also flying out of there at that time. This was probably 4 or 5 years ago. Before UA left DAL did they ever get to fly out of the new terminal where WN is?
I've always wondered if 15 and 17 are the "UA gates" |
Originally Posted by dayone
(Post 30574927)
No. UA signed a lease for two gates while it was still operating in the old terminal. It subleased them to WN prior to the opening of the new terminal.
I've always wondered if 15 and 17 are the "UA gates" 11 and 13 are the Continental gates, while 15 and 17 are the American gates. That’s how it was laid out in the initial artist’s renderings. That said, I don’t know what bobOscar’s complaint with the old UA gates is at all. Yeah, it was definitely kinda ghetto, but as far as getting in and out, it was practically like flying to your own personal airport! It had its own TSA checkpoint. And the largest plane there was a 50-seater, so the lines at TSA were reliably short and occupied by, predominantly, savvy business flyers. To me, that deal was a dream that I miss severely, compared to joining the eight zillion Kettles at the new improved Southwest Airlines terminal. |
Originally Posted by Legend717
(Post 30576462)
11 and 13 are the Continental gates, while 15 and 17 are the American gates.
That’s how it was laid out in the initial artist’s renderings. |
Originally Posted by dayone
(Post 30574927)
No. UA signed a lease for two gates while it was still operating in the old terminal. It subleased them to WN prior to the opening of the new terminal.
Originally Posted by dayone
(Post 30574927)
That may well be true, but UA did fly out of new terminal. One of two flights that I booked ended up on AS, thanks to UA not having enough deicing fluid, and me hopping bus / Orange Line to DFW to fly AS to SEA, because UA was not going to be flying anytime soon. Actually, no. 11 and 13 are the Continental gates, while 15 and 17 are the American gates. That’s how it was laid out in the initial artist’s renderings. That said, I don’t know what bobOscar’s complaint with the old UA gates is at all. Yeah, it was definitely kinda ghetto, but as far as getting in and out, it was practically like flying to your own personal airport! It had its own TSA checkpoint. And the largest plane there was a 50-seater, so the lines at TSA were reliably short and occupied by, predominantly, savvy business flyers. To me, that deal was a dream that I miss severely, compared to joining the eight zillion Kettles at the new improved Southwest Airlines terminal. Actually, no. UA flew 76 seater CR7s to IAH. Ask me how I know ;) |
at the tine decisions were initially made, CO and UA hadn’t merged. |
Originally Posted by EmailKid
(Post 30577368)
That may well be true, but UA did fly out of new terminal. One of two flights that I booked ended up on AS, thanks to UA not having enough deicing fluid, and me hopping bus / Orange Line to DFW to fly AS to SEA, because UA was not going to be flying anytime soon. Actually, no. 11 and 13 are the Continental gates, while 15 and 17 are the American gates. That’s how it was laid out in the initial artist’s renderings. That said, I don’t know what bobOscar’s complaint with the old UA gates is at all. Yeah, it was definitely kinda ghetto, but as far as getting in and out, it was practically like flying to your own personal airport! It had its own TSA checkpoint. And the largest plane there was a 50-seater, so the lines at TSA were reliably short and occupied by, predominantly, savvy business flyers. To me, that deal was a dream that I miss severely, compared to joining the eight zillion Kettles at the new improved Southwest Airlines terminal. Actually, no. UA flew 76 seater CR7s to IAH. Ask me how I know ;) But I stand by my statement- the dilapidated gates were a breeze to get into, and baggage claim was speedy as well! |
Originally Posted by Legend717
(Post 30578168)
That’s true, come to think of it. And CO also did some Q400 flights as well. But I stand by my statement- the dilapidated gates were a breeze to get into, and baggage claim was speedy as well! Would not know about baggage - I was gone before it came out ;) |
Originally Posted by Peterson4025
(Post 30569044)
Applaud for the additional services to SFO/SJC/SAN. :D. One can only hope that AS will add new routes to east coast.
Originally Posted by jrl767
(Post 30569066)
huh? :confused: AS just axed the east coast (DAL<—>DCA/LGA) routes they inherited from VX; WN has service to pretty much every east coast city from DAL ... where exactly are you hoping AS adds service? DAL-EWR DAL-ORD DAL-MIA (but would have to open a new MIA station) DAL-BDL (some risk and also Hartford is not currently an AS station) |
Hi -
I miss flying PDX-DFW-LGA and racking up those EQMs at .04 apiece. |
Originally Posted by Toshbaf
(Post 30580729)
AS could add service to cities with no WN competition. Examples:
DAL-EWR DAL-ORD DAL-MIA (but would have to open a new MIA station) DAL-BDL (some risk and also Hartford is not currently an AS station) And AS has made it plenty clear IMHO that they have no intention of flying EAST from DAL - that was a Virgin lousy idea. They won DAL when AA was forced to divest at DAL and could not figure out what tp do with it. |
Originally Posted by EmailKid
(Post 30580793)
Um, WN flies DAL-LGA/MDW/FLL - close enough for most, and actually preferred by many @:-)
. Locals would know more but I think the ORD market over the MDW market is small. This includes those from Rockford and northern Chicago suburbs, like Niles. EWR does have a big market that prefers EWR to LGA. Those from West Orange, Saddle River, Morristown, and much most of Northern New Jersey. MIA does have a market that prefers MIA to FLL, mostly the city of Miami but not Broward County. So, DAL-EWR seems like the biggest market of the three over competing airports that are served by WN. One problem is that only O&D would fly the route. Not many from SEA, PDX, SFO, SJC, LAX, or SAN would want to fly to EWR via DAL. |
Originally Posted by Toshbaf
(Post 30580808)
There are some that don't prefer MDW, LGA, or FLL.
Locals would know more but I think the ORD market over the MDW market is small. This includes those from Rockford and northern Chicago suburbs, like Niles. EWR does have a big market that prefers EWR to LGA. Those from West Orange, Saddle River, Morristown, and much most of Northern New Jersey. MIA does have a market that prefers MIA to FLL, mostly the city of Miami but not Broward County. So, DAL-EWR seems like the biggest market of the three over competing airports that are served by WN. One problem is that only O&D would fly the route. Not many from SEA, PDX, SFO, SJC, LAX, or SAN would want to fly to EWR via DAL. James |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:18 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.