Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

Gay couple forced to move plane seats to make way for straight couple to sit together

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Gay couple forced to move plane seats to make way for straight couple to sit together

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2018, 3:30 pm
  #16  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
Originally Posted by DavidDTW
Do you have a link to the AS statement?
It's in the article linked to in the OP.
NoLaGent is online now  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 3:56 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,838
Kind of an inflammatory thread title when we don't know if discrimination had anything to do with this. Couple = two people. And how do we know the other couple is straight? Lots of assumptions about something that happens every day...
Grog and muji like this.
flytoeat is online now  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 4:12 pm
  #18  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
Originally Posted by flytoeat
Kind of an inflammatory thread title when we don't know if discrimination had anything to do with this. Couple = two people. And how do we know the other couple is straight? Lots of assumptions about something that happens every day...
It's the title of the article linked to in the OP, and I completely agree with you on your other points.
flytoeat likes this.
NoLaGent is online now  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 4:46 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Programs: Bonvoy Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, Hertz Gold
Posts: 1,388
Originally Posted by Colin
i’ve paid for enough $18 Abbey cocktails that its owner can surely pony up for a flat bed over Y+
most are 16;-)

Last edited by dayone; Jul 30, 2018 at 5:21 pm Reason: Remove redacted masked vulgarity from quote.
TravisMT81 is online now  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 5:47 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Berlin, TXL
Programs: OW Emerald, *A gold, Skyteam elite plus, Hilton gold, SPG gold
Posts: 339
Originally Posted by mvoight
"We will never be flying <fill in the blank> airline again"..... All businesses make mistakes or employees which do things incorrectly.
To me, it depends on how the business responds to my complaint that makes a difference.

That says, there is some missing information. The article indicated AS told it 2 couples were assigned the same seats.
How exactly would this happen unless someone manually overrode the computer. And, if the gay couple had valid boarding passes for the seats, and were able to board using them, why would they be kicked out of their seats?
Exactly my point
RolfD is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 6:44 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BOS/ORH
Programs: AS 75K
Posts: 18,323
Issues with duplicate seats started up this year with the merger: AS / VX Dysfunction
CDKing is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 8:44 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SEA
Programs: DL Plat, AS MVPG, Bonvoy Plat/LT Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,263
Originally Posted by HomerJay
Could it be that Cooley's partner was bounced from his seat by a Federal Air Marshal? Seems more than possible at this point. There are only eight seats up front, and if Cooley's partner had an aisle seat, that would be my bet.
The AS statement mentioned the seat in dispute was Premium Class (their caps) so likely within the main cabin.
mbluecpa is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 8:55 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ATL
Programs: DL DM, Hyatt LT DM, Wyndham DM, Hertz PC, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,038
Originally Posted by UpgradeMe
I'm still waiting for an evidence that this would not have happened to a heterosexual couple under the same circumstances.
This is something I first thought of. It sounds like it was a double booked seat and they went to the seat and asked. Then was a 'we are a couple too' and thus the situation is created. I, and it seems many others, seriously doubt Alaska and their employees went out of their way to single someone out because of their sexual preference.

The Points Guy's article even states that Alaska has a history and major support of the LGBT community.
dinanm3atl is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 9:05 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Programs: Alaska Tanzanite 100K
Posts: 3,858
well, the passenger's record has been 'scrubbed' and all the original comments are hidden or blocked from view by those who work for Alaska, including information on the flight's departure. Earlier this morning, friend said it was a "damn near book" of comments in the reservation. Alaska is definitely looking into this, but its also allowing a lot of rumors and mistruths to be going around.

Even I speculated it sounds like it could have been a buddy pass, as non-revs will sometimes try to act like they are entitled or don't know all the rules (I've seen this on many flights, were people will ask others to move for them - especially nonrevs).

It just didn't seem like Alaska would remove a customer from a plane over a seat assignment unless they caused a bit of a ruckus.
UAPremierExec is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 9:18 pm
  #25  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,205
Originally Posted by UAPremierExec
well, the passenger's record has been 'scrubbed' and all the original comments are hidden or blocked from view by those who work for Alaska, including information on the flight's departure. Earlier this morning, friend said it was a "damn near book" of comments in the reservation. Alaska is definitely looking into this, but its also allowing a lot of rumors and mistruths to be going around.

Even I speculated it sounds like it could have been a buddy pass, as non-revs will sometimes try to act like they are entitled or don't know all the rules (I've seen this on many flights, were people will ask others to move for them - especially nonrevs).

It just didn't seem like Alaska would remove a customer from a plane over a seat assignment unless they caused a bit of a ruckus.
The bar owner was potentially on a buddy pass, his companion, or the other "straight" passenger?
bocastephen is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 9:20 pm
  #26  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
Originally Posted by UAPremierExec
well, the passenger's record has been 'scrubbed' and all the original comments are hidden or blocked from view by those who work for Alaska, including information on the flight's departure. Earlier this morning, friend said it was a "damn near book" of comments in the reservation. Alaska is definitely looking into this, but its also allowing a lot of rumors and mistruths to be going around.

Even I speculated it sounds like it could have been a buddy pass, as non-revs will sometimes try to act like they are entitled or don't know all the rules (I've seen this on many flights, were people will ask others to move for them - especially nonrevs).

It just didn't seem like Alaska would remove a customer from a plane over a seat assignment unless they caused a bit of a ruckus.
You bet it's been scrubbed, AS is doing serious damage control from a high level with this one, especially given their longstanding support to the LGBTQ market.

I used to live in LA and through a mutual friend of the pax, can confirm they were revenue, they voluntarily removed themselves, and AS isn't commenting because they're settling an employee's actions directly with the pax. The root of the problem was an IT failure, compounded by a customer service failure, plain and simple. You can find numerous other examples in this forum of the multitude of problems they have on their hands right now in this regard, especially since the merger.
NoLaGent is online now  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 9:29 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,610
I mean, this weekend something similar happened to me and my partner (a gay couple). We are mvp-gold/mvp, and got in-flight upgraded from premium to first-class after we had already boarded (aparently 2 first-class pax didn't show up, clearing 2 more seats)? Anyways, we were sitting in 6E/6F, and I think the flight attendent got confused and came to our seat and by mistake asked me (6E) and the passenger in 6D to come up to first-class, leaving my gay husband back in row 6.

It was clear that the flight attendant had made a mistake when doing the in-flight upgrade after I checked the alaska app that it was actually me & my partner who should've been upgraded together (the app now showed a green checkmark against our waitlist). But by then it was a bit too late because the other pax had already gone ahead and sit in first class and we didn't want to make it awkward or cause a ruckus by asking them to come back on the mistake.

We didn't scream homophobia or anything, and just flew separately with me in first class and husband in premium because honestly it wasn't that big a deal.
ashill, NoLaGent and rustykettel like this.

Last edited by nomiiiii; Jul 30, 2018 at 9:35 pm
nomiiiii is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 9:37 pm
  #28  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AS, UA, WN, IHG Diamond Elite, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, CET 7*
Posts: 3,300
Originally Posted by nomiiiii
I mean, this weekend something similar happened to me and my partner (a gay couple). We are mvp-gold/mvp, and got in-flight upgraded from premium to first-class after we had already boarded (aparently 2 first-class pax didn't show up, clearing 2 more seats)? Anyways, we were sitting in 6E/6F, and I think the flight attendent got confused and came to our seat and by mistake asked me (6E) and the passenger in 6D to come up to first-class, leaving my gay husband back in row 6.

It was clear that the flight attendant had made a mistake when doing the in-flight upgrade after I checked the alaska app that it was actually me & my partner who should've been upgraded together. But by then it was a bit too late because the other pax had already gone ahead and sit in first class and we didn't want to make it awkward or cause a ruckus by asking them to come back on the mistake.

We didn't scream homophobia or anything, and just flew separately because honestly it wasn't that big a deal.
To be fair, it's not remotely similar, and in fact, the exact opposite of what happened to these guys. However, if you're not watching the app like a hawk (something I got used to doing while traveling on UA for many, many years), most folks wouldn't be armed with the knowledge to know otherwise.
NoLaGent is online now  
Old Jul 30, 2018, 9:46 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,610
It was similar in that we could've easily cried "oh my god how can you not see we are a gay couple travelling together, how can you assume that only one of us gets upgraded and not the other one, how can you make this mistake of not knowing we are travelling together as a gay couple so should be upgraded together omg omg omg!"

Maybe some day I'll throw down a big whiny gay drama and become youtube infamous.
mbluecpa likes this.
nomiiiii is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2018, 12:05 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 113
Definitely a Corbyn[1] style act for money, points or embrace the cause who knows. Unless they were wearing rainbow t-shirts, friendship bracelets and holding hands how were the flight to know? And I'd wager flight crew to be least homophobic people in the industry. Still ignoring the gay part, moving someone to seat a couple together is just silly.

[1] https://www.virgintrains.co.uk/about...ervice-1530005

Last edited by mattspod; Jul 31, 2018 at 3:10 am
mattspod is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.