CR7s gone in November?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
CR7s gone in November?
It looks like there were some schedule updates and CR7s are no longer on the schedule by Nov. PDX-ONT, PDX-BUR, PDX-FAT, PDX-TUS, SEA-SBA, SEA-FAT, SAN-FAT, etc. 4 pm SEA-OAK stays 737 in fall before E75 for winter.
#2
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Upper Left Corner of the Map
Programs: AS MVPG & Board Room, Marriott Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 2,203
was poking around to see if maybe they're being shifted to other markets, and was surprised to see (or not) 1 YYC frequency with 738. But, they're not gone entirely. I still see them operating to SBA and FAT and one frequency to BOI. This is just though dummy bookings. Where are you getting your data?
Last edited by 98103; Apr 25, 2016 at 10:49 am
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
Just poking around. Per a.net:
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-fo....main/6681244/
The last day of scheduled operations appears to be November 17th where there are 44 departures scheduled. It's likely they are still working on the draw down plan. Seems unlikely they would go from ~8 aircraft operating to zero overnight.
#4
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Upper Left Corner of the Map
Programs: AS MVPG & Board Room, Marriott Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 2,203
I was looking at flights before the 17th. I checked a few after that and didn't see any.
Doesn't mean it can't change back, but there are NO TEARS HERE for the departure of the CRJs. Hated 'em.
Doesn't mean it can't change back, but there are NO TEARS HERE for the departure of the CRJs. Hated 'em.
#5
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AS MVPG, 1MM
Posts: 377
My PDX-SBA flight for late November, long a CRJ, is now listed as E175. In the past year and 6 flights, two delayed and one canceled for mechanical and 2 an hour late. Hoping for better luck with the new aircraft.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,639
They seem to insist on waiting for the QX E75s unfortunately. The longer CR7 routes are getting OO E75s first, while shorter new routes (SJC-SAN, SJC-SNA) are also getting those. The thinking must be they need to offer a better product to compete with WN but for some reason that thinking doesn't apply to PDX-OAK? Annoying