Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Atmos Rewards
Reload this Page >

Alaska Updates Service Animal Policy (No More "Emotional Support Animals")

Alaska Updates Service Animal Policy (No More "Emotional Support Animals")

Old Dec 29, 2020 | 7:21 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,020
Alaska Updates Service Animal Policy (No More "Emotional Support Animals")

https://newsroom.alaskaair.com/2020-...-animal-policy

Following recent changes to U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) rules, Alaska Airlines will no longer accept emotional support animals on its flights. Effective Jan. 11, 2021, Alaska will only transport service dogs, which are specially trained to perform tasks for the benefit of a qualified individual with a disability.
missamo80 is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 8:05 am
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
You should expect this to rapidly become the norm across US carriers.

DOT made this change at the request of US air carriers including AS, with strong consumer backing.. Thus, not surprising that AS is implementing what it asked for.
MSPeconomist likes this.
Often1 is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 11:09 am
  #3  
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: SAN, BOS
Programs: AS MVPG100K, AA ExPlat, QR Platinum
Posts: 2,529
Thank goodness
TravelingZoomer is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 11:29 am
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: PDX, OGG or between the two
Programs: AS Gold
Posts: 3,189
But is this really going to change anything long term? I suspect in a short amount of time everyone will just get the paperwork to re-classify their dog/horse/snake as a, "psychiatric support animal" and we're back to square one. Of course, I'm pleased that something is being done about this but fear it's just a small hurdle for those wishing to work the system.
anteater likes this.
mtofell is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 11:31 am
  #5  
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 2,346
Thank you, Alaska, for leading the way on this!
RAD_PDX is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 11:53 am
  #6  
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: SAN, BOS
Programs: AS MVPG100K, AA ExPlat, QR Platinum
Posts: 2,529
Originally Posted by mtofell
But is this really going to change anything long term? I suspect in a short amount of time everyone will just get the paperwork to re-classify their dog/horse/snake as a, "psychiatric support animal" and we're back to square one. Of course, I'm pleased that something is being done about this but fear it's just a small hurdle for those wishing to work the system.
How many Karens actually have notes for their anti mask idiocy? I suspect most Karens wont bother going through the paperwork
TravelingZoomer is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 12:03 pm
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: PDX, OGG or between the two
Programs: AS Gold
Posts: 3,189
Originally Posted by TravelingZoomer
How many Karen’s actually have notes for their anti mask idiocy? I suspect most Karen’s won’t bother going through the paperwork
Is/was there paperwork required for the current policy of ESAs or was it just (laughing) the honor system? I hope you're right but am pretty sure some doctor that graduated at the bottom of his/her class is scheming a business plan to sell "psychiatric service animal" certifications as I type this.
mtofell is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 12:05 pm
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,619
Originally Posted by Often1
You should expect this to rapidly become the norm across US carriers.

DOT made this change at the request of US air carriers including AS, with strong consumer backing.. Thus, not surprising that AS is implementing what it asked for.
Given this, I'm surprised it's taking so long for airlines to change their rules. If the DOT announcement was expected, they should have had the new rule already written/vetted by legal staff and ready to be announced instantly.

Maybe some customers would have howled about not being to bring their doggies along on holiday travel, but if it's the same on all airlines and is due to a federal rule, there would be no place for those customers to go except to their cars and RVs.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 1:19 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Mexico City, MX
Programs: No airline/hotel status use, Chase UR, Amex MR, CapOne etc
Posts: 266
As a dog owner who flys a lot with his small dog I fully support them getting rid of the ESA loophole. Tired of people free loading while others who play by the rules have to pay. I wonder why Alaska says no dogs all together rather then just charge for it. That being said its concerning me so many people here are popping the champagne that dogs will simply not be allowed bar none, even if you pay. Trust me flying with a dog is expensive and a huge PITA with the paperwork, esp when you play by the rules, I don't usually do it unless I have to.

I don't understand why they simply don't assign certain flights as "dog friendly" maybe just 1 flight a week is enough people will choose that flight. They should do that with infants too, why not have dog friendly flights and kid friendly flights, would make everyones life easier.
PointsPanda is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 1:44 pm
  #10  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Premier Platinum, AS Atmos Platinum
Posts: 2,274
Originally Posted by PointsPanda
I don't understand why they simply don't assign certain flights as "dog friendly" maybe just 1 flight a week is enough people will choose that flight. They should do that with infants too, why not have dog friendly flights and kid friendly flights, would make everyones life easier.
You do realize that kids are not pets, right?
dls25, Calculon, jinglish and 2 others like this.
jsguyrus is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 1:54 pm
  #11  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SFO
Programs: AS — views are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer
Posts: 171
Originally Posted by mtofell
But is this really going to change anything long term? I suspect in a short amount of time everyone will just get the paperwork to re-classify their dog/horse/snake as a, "psychiatric support animal" and we're back to square one. Of course, I'm pleased that something is being done about this but fear it's just a small hurdle for those wishing to work the system.
Originally Posted by mtofell
Is/was there paperwork required for the current policy of ESAs or was it just (laughing) the honor system? I hope you're right but am pretty sure some doctor that graduated at the bottom of his/her class is scheming a business plan to sell "psychiatric service animal" certifications as I type this.
Emotional support animals
Current: airline paperwork
New: ESAs no longer allowed

Service animals
Current: no paperwork required
New: Department of Transportation paperwork; dogs only

If the following form is up to date, the DOT does not require a professional's signature for a service animal. Another difference from the ESA paperwork: it is a federal form. Whether the conditions and warnings are a deterrent to fraud, you make the call:
https://www.transportation.gov/indiv...ice-animal-air
mtofell likes this.

Last edited by skyblue; Dec 29, 2020 at 2:00 pm Reason: Clarifying differences in forms
skyblue is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 1:54 pm
  #12  
Formerly known as stellertony
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MEX
Posts: 1,151
Originally Posted by PointsPanda
As a dog owner who flys a lot with his small dog I fully support them getting rid of the ESA loophole. Tired of people free loading while others who play by the rules have to pay. I wonder why Alaska says no dogs all together rather then just charge for it. That being said its concerning me so many people here are popping the champagne that dogs will simply not be allowed bar none, even if you pay. Trust me flying with a dog is expensive and a huge PITA with the paperwork, esp when you play by the rules, I don't usually do it unless I have to.

I don't understand why they simply don't assign certain flights as "dog friendly" maybe just 1 flight a week is enough people will choose that flight. They should do that with infants too, why not have dog friendly flights and kid friendly flights, would make everyones life easier.
I understand the confusion - this announcement only relates to animals previously transported for free in the cabin, and the full statement links to Alaskas pet policy - youre still free to pay to transport your dog in the cabin or the cargo hold.
PointsPanda likes this.
tonei is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 2:16 pm
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,373
Originally Posted by tonei
I understand the confusion - this announcement only relates to animals previously transported for free in the cabin, and the full statement links to Alaskas pet policy - youre still free to pay to transport your dog in the cabin or the cargo hold.
Yes, but the dog has to fit in the appropriate carrier and needs to stay there. Uncaged animals that take dumps larger than the current inflight meal "wrap" are now prohibited.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 2:17 pm
  #14  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, Or USA
Posts: 1,829
Originally Posted by mtofell
But is this really going to change anything long term? I suspect in a short amount of time everyone will just get the paperwork to re-classify their dog/horse/snake as a, "psychiatric support animal" and we're back to square one. Of course, I'm pleased that something is being done about this but fear it's just a small hurdle for those wishing to work the system.
There is no "psychiatric support animal" in the rule. There IS a "psychiatric service animal" reference requiring airlines to treat psychiatric service animals the same as other service animals that are trained to do work or perform tasks to assist a qualified individual with a disability and no longer allowing airlines to impose additional requirements on individuals traveling with psychiatric service animals as a condition of transport. Service animal is previously defined as a dog and no longer requiring airlines to accommodate miniature horses, cats, rabbits, birds and all other service animals that airlines are currently required to transport.

Sorry, no dog/horse/snakes on a plane.
missamo80 likes this.
johnp012001 is online now  
Old Dec 29, 2020 | 6:42 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ORD / MDW / FLL
Programs: DL DM/1MM, AA EXP, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 2,295
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
Yes, but the dog has to fit in the appropriate carrier and needs to stay there. Uncaged animals that take dumps larger than the current inflight meal "wrap" are now prohibited.
Well, so much for flying with my emotional support great dane.
SOBE ER DOC is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.