![]() |
Originally Posted by zorn
(Post 9447664)
The denial of entry for someone who didn't have their card that day, which would be an actual incidence of foolishly bad customer service...
|
Originally Posted by zorn
(Post 9449144)
One reason I have the expected credentials available at the lounge entrance is not so much for the benefit of AC, but for the benefit of the people behind me in line to get in.
I don't like waiting behind Don't You Know Who I Am, and if I can avoid it, I don't want people waiting behind me in line for no good reason either. |
Can someone explain to me why an Aeroplan SE or E is often requested, even if I am flying in paid business class? Of course, I understand the rationale for the request for such a card, when one is flying on an upgraded business class ticket.
|
To equate a credit card to an aeroplan card is silly. Do you people surrender your driver's licence or SIN card when a retailer asks you for that? Where does it end? Everyone and their dogs got a card for you to carry. AC MLL agents can go figure it out on their computers if I can use the lounge or not. I now put all my airline and rental car card numbers into my PDA, I only carry my credit cards and bank cards.
|
Originally Posted by Sunny Day
(Post 9459839)
Do you people surrender your driver's licence or SIN card when a retailer asks you for that?
If the retailer says they have to swipe your frequent shopper card to get a discount will you refuse in case any camels break their backs? It's their perogative. As is it of a traveller who chooses not to carry the card and hence can be denied admission. Simon |
Their program.
Their card. Their lounge. Their rules. Simple as that. |
they can see status on the pax's boarding pass, so why they would need the card beats me.
or if you're in exec, you're automatically in so that also makes the card pointless. this year's card is nice. i like it. |
Talk about beating a dead camel.....
|
Up to a few years ago, Walmart used to ask customers who return purchases for refund their driver's licence. Why do they need that? Who knows? According to the logic of a few here, it's their store, their policy, their requirements. So we must obey their rules if we want the privilege of refunding our purchases, right? Nope. Privacy Commisioner ruled that no business can ask for and keep track of your personal identification like your driver's licence or SIN. We consumers certainly do not have to give our driver's licence to anyone least of which a retailer. Walmart was asked to stop that practice. Point is just because a company comes up with a rule, it doesn't make it right.
|
Originally Posted by Sunny Day
(Post 9465685)
Up to a few years ago, Walmart used to ask customers who return purchases for refund their driver's licence. Why do they need that? Who knows? According to the logic of a few here, it's their store, their policy, their requirements. So we must obey their rules if we want the privilege of refunding our purchases, right? Nope. Privacy Commisioner ruled that no business can ask for and keep track of your personal identification like your driver's licence or SIN. We consumers certainly do not have to give our driver's licence to anyone least of which a retailer. Walmart was asked to stop that practice. Point is just because a company comes up with a rule, it doesn't make it right.
Who owns the driver's license? Who issues it? Who asked to see it? Why? Answer those questions and then we can discuss logic. |
As I and others have said just because a business comes up with a procedure to deal with customers (I call entry to MLL a procedure), issues a plastic gimmicky card with your name, says a few things about this card is the property of.....does not make it right for the customer. We have to fight to make changes that are good for the consumers. See Walmart story again.
How about this for a change...they have rules for us, let us have rules for them when they deal with us customers. |
Originally Posted by Sunny Day
(Post 9466804)
As I and others have said just because a business comes up with a procedure to deal with customers (I call entry to MLL a procedure), issues a plastic gimmicky card with your name, says a few things about this card is the property of.....does not make it right for the customer. We have to fight to make changes that are good for the consumers. See Walmart story again.
|
"Who owns the Elite card?"
I do. "Who issues it?" Air Canada, to the best of my knowledge. "Who is asking to see it?" Maple Leaf Lounge admins. "Why?" That's what we're trying to figure out, isn't it? We've already established that they can determine our status without a card, so why insist we haul it around? Of course, if you're some sort of perverted philatelist who appreciates pulchritude in pointless plastic pieces and wants to parade it around, who am I to deprive you of your pleasure? For those who believe it's not big deal, I agree, it's not a big deal, but neither is a mosquito. ;) |
Originally Posted by jezsik
(Post 9469188)
"Who owns the Elite card?"
I do. "Who issues it?" Air Canada, to the best of my knowledge. Anyway, I think it would be better for everyone - the airline, the lounge agents, and the passengers and their pet camels, if they could get the 2D bar code readers rolled out and usable for lounge entry. It would presumably be faster for the agent, and faster for the passenger, reduce the possibility of fraudulent entry and lost $ for the airline (since anyone can add "SE" or "E" to their OLCI printed boarding pass, but you'd have to be pretty motivated to crack the 2D code). |
Originally Posted by zorn
(Post 9469342)
Anyway, I think it would be better for everyone - the airline, the lounge agents, and the passengers and their pet camels, if they could get the 2D bar code readers rolled out and usable for lounge entry.
Just a thought. bawm |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:14 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.