Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Are the 762's Really That Bad to Fly In?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Are the 762's Really That Bad to Fly In?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2006, 10:37 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: AC 75K
Posts: 259
Are the 762's Really That Bad to Fly In?

Hi All

Long time lurker, first time poster, so please be gentle with me!

Am travelling to the UK in June/July to visit the family and got a great deal YXE-MAN ($838!!!) on an A fare, so 100% miles, status miles etc. Was very pleased with the fare but realise that the aircraft is the dreaded 762.

Just how bad is it sitting in Y transatlantic on the 762's? In a former life I flew countless of the CP 763's to Aus and NZ (or at least as far as HNL from YYZ & YVR) for about 10yrs in both J & Y and found the Y seating v comfortable and roomy.

Am I in for 6.5 hrs of hell from YYZ-MAN in Y in one of the AC 762's? They get an enormous amount of stick here, so much so that you'd think you were going to be strapped to a rack and tortured as you cross the pond. Is that in fact the case? Basically, what should I prepare myself for? Any insights/info /anecdotes greatfully accepted. I've also never used MAN before so any advice/info on that part of my trip would also be most welcome.

Even it is likely to be torture, I'd endure almost anything to avoid LHR in the summertime (!!!) but forewarned is forearmed or something like that.

Love the forum and find it a great resource, even though I fly so little these days that my chances of sitting in J are pretty much 0. Look forward to your replies (if any!!).

Cheers

YXEG
YXEGeordie is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 12:31 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: BKK
Programs: None. I'm cured.
Posts: 825
The 762s in Y are fine. A bit worn perhaps but more room than BA Third World Traveller. Obviously no AVOD or bells and whistles but nothing you were expecting anyway.

Most of the noise you see here about these birds is about the front cabin. Not great if you are expecting the full International J product.

As you said, the best thing about this flight is that it gets you to MAN without the hassle or waste of time connecting at LHR. That's got to be worth something.

MCM.
Minicooperman is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 5:40 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: YXU, ON Canada
Programs: AC LT E50K; AC*MM; SPG LT Gold
Posts: 4,665
There's really very little difference between the 76Xs in the economy cabin. The complaints here are all about the domestic J cabin, which is not comparable to the Int'l Exec First, as MCM points out.

Say hello to Sunderland for me when you're there
Academic is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 5:56 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,550
YXEGeordie: Welcome to the forum.

Have a good flight.
airbus320 is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 6:04 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: YHZ
Programs: Sans souci
Posts: 2,190
Originally Posted by YXEGeordie
... on an A fare, so 100% miles, status miles etc ...
You have been lurking for a while!

Welcome to FT.
AnselmAdorne is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 6:07 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Programs: DL NW
Posts: 119
I'm not familiar with AC's 762s, but I can tell you that US's transatlantic are fairly unpleasant.
jf841 is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 7:36 am
  #7  
cur
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: fwp blood diamond, dykwia uranium
Posts: 7,251
I just don't like the huge projector for entertainment. What a ridiculous idea that was from boeing.
cur is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 10:18 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
If you're not in J and don't have a lot of carry-on, this is actually my favourite bird for transatlantic travel. It is no different from a 763 in Y other than the cabin length is shorter. I find the front cabin in Y to be quite intimate and I like the 2-3-2 configuration of all versions of the 767. Seat pitch is better than BA.

The only downsides are:
- No AVOD and you can be seated far from the screen
- Cabin may be slightly worn (but not horribly)
- less overhead stowage space than on A330/340
The Lev is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 11:16 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 44*38.670N 63*37.548W
Programs: several
Posts: 1,870
Originally Posted by cur
I just don't like the huge projector for entertainment. What a ridiculous idea that was from boeing.
well when the 767 was designed, in 1979-80, do you think they had quality projection video available to them?

It used to be that a on long flight on an AC L1011 or 747 you had to listen to the clickety-click of a projector during the whole movie, until 1982.
jral is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 1:35 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,449
Originally Posted by The Lev
If you're not in J and don't have a lot of carry-on, this is actually my favourite bird for transatlantic travel.
Agree. Have spent many hours on 67's and other than the movie sometimes being hard to see depending on where your seat is, I like the economy layout.

Welcome to FT.
tcook052 is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 1:46 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Programs: SPG - Platinum, Hertz - 5 Star
Posts: 2,387
Originally Posted by YXEGeordie
Hi All

Long time lurker, first time poster, so please be gentle with me!


Am I in for 6.5 hrs of hell from YYZ-MAN in Y in one of the AC 762's?

Welcome t0 FT and please define "hell"

As for the 762, the airplane is fine so long as you are not expecting lie flat beds up front or seat back VOD in the back. Avoid the bulkhead rows in the back if you are tall.

Given the choice between an AC 762 and a high density 757 on a charter, I'd say there is no contest, in favour of AC

DF
Doc Fraud is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 2:17 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,068
The 2-3-2 Y configuration in the 767 is very comfortable from a passenger perspective.Never any bad flights in Y.As others have noted J is where all the noise is.
acysb87 is offline  
Old May 19, 2006, 8:33 pm
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
Originally Posted by acysb87
The 2-3-2 Y configuration in the 767 is very comfortable from a passenger perspective.Never any bad flights in Y.As others have noted J is where all the noise is.
We agree on that......... Y is good J sucks! on the 767
why fly is offline  
Old May 20, 2006, 8:43 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K MM * DL MM * HH Diamond * Marriott Lifetime Titanium * Queen's '92
Posts: 5,950
It is an excellent piece of equipment for meeting noted FT celebrity Ken HAAmer.

Simon
Simon is offline  
Old May 20, 2006, 11:10 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,068
Originally Posted by Simon
It is an excellent piece of equipment for meeting noted FT celebrity Ken HAAmer.

Simon
You do mean the 767-200 series,correct?
acysb87 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.