Air Canada would study Airbus, Boeing for transatlantic narrowbody needs
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-a...-idUSKCN1P82FT
MONTREAL (Reuters) - Air Canada is interested in further developing the use of narrowbody aircraft to serve the transatlantic market and would look at both Airbus and Boeing models, a senior executive said. Mark Galardo, vice-president of network planning at the Canadian national carrier, said in answer to a question that the group would study options including the Airbus A321XLR and the Boeing 737 MAX. However, he told a media briefing it was “premature” to discuss whether Air Canada might order the Airbus A321XLR, a potential future expansion of the Airbus portfolio that sources say the planemaker may launch by the middle of this year. |
Dear AC,
Please make sure Airbus puts more than one lav in your new aircraft, should you choose to purchase them. BR, WTME |
Originally Posted by tcook052
(Post 30654770)
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-a...-idUSKCN1P82FT
MONTREAL (Reuters) - Air Canada is interested in further developing the use of narrowbody aircraft to serve the transatlantic market and would look at both Airbus and Boeing models, a senior executive said. Mark Galardo, vice-president of network planning at the Canadian national carrier, said in answer to a question that the group would study options including the Airbus A321XLR and the Boeing 737 MAX. However, he told a media briefing it was “premature” to discuss whether Air Canada might order the Airbus A321XLR, a potential future expansion of the Airbus portfolio that sources say the planemaker may launch by the middle of this year. |
Interesting. So they will sold as O and Y cabins since I doubt they would put in the pods.
Or worse - they go to Rouge... |
Originally Posted by tcook052
(Post 30654770)
Air Canada ....would look at both Airbus and Boeing models, a senior executive said.
|
Originally Posted by hydrogen
(Post 30654829)
Interesting. So they will sold as O and Y cabins since I doubt they would put in the pods.
.. |
Originally Posted by Jagboi
(Post 30654848)
Is there anyone else who could make a commercial aircraft with transatlantic range suitable for AC's operations???
I mean, I guess AC could throw us all a curveball and order a bunch of Tupolev Tu-204s, Irkut MC-21s, or Comac C919s, but somehow I don't see that happening. IDK, I'm sure I could end up proven wrong, lol. |
Originally Posted by Jagboi
(Post 30654848)
Is there anyone else who could make a commercial aircraft with transatlantic range suitable for AC's operations???
|
And to think that I celebrated the impending end of TATL narrowbody travel when the 757 started to disappear.
|
Originally Posted by eigenvector
(Post 30655466)
And to think that I celebrated the impending end of TATL narrowbody travel when the 757 started to disappear.
I think long-haul flights in a narrowbody can be made to not suck, it's just a question of whether or not the route economics permit them to, and whether or not the airlines want them to. |
Originally Posted by shadowspar
(Post 30655898)
...I think long-haul flights in a narrowbody can be made to not suck...
|
Probably safe on those ones though...
|
Originally Posted by eigenvector
(Post 30655466)
And to think that I celebrated the impending end of TATL narrowbody travel when the 757 started to disappear.
|
Originally Posted by WildcatYXU
(Post 30657053)
TATL travel in a 17/30 seat sucks regardless of the aircraft. And there is no reason why would be a TATL trip in J aboard of an A321XLR equipped with proper lie flat seats worse than a trip in a widebody equipped with a similar seat.
They seem perfectly fine to fly a Y/PY product over the ocean with the 7M8. Premium routes like YYZ-LHR will have the demand to continue commanding multiple widebodies per day, but new, currently uneconomical or marginal routes that might be served by an A321XLR may not justify a true international J product. |
Originally Posted by eigenvector
(Post 30657955)
Is there reason to believe that a future A321XLR operated by AC would be equipped with lie-flat seats?
They seem perfectly fine to fly a Y/PY product over the ocean with the 7M8. Premium routes like YYZ-LHR will have the demand to continue commanding multiple widebodies per day, but new, currently uneconomical or marginal routes that might be served by an A321XLR may not justify a true international J product. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:01 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.