Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Transit advice; HKG or PEK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2017, 3:01 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Programs: Aeroplan E50/MM, HH gold, Nat Exec Elite, Kimpton Karma
Posts: 2,354
Transit advice; HKG or PEK?

Have the choice of transiting in HKG or PEK. Layover would be a couple of hours. Comfort and food helpful. Would appreciate any suggestions as to which would airport/lounge would offer a better experience.

Thanks in advance.
Bartolo is online now  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 3:10 pm
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE*2MM. SPG Plat life
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by Bartolo
Have the choice of transiting in HKG or PEK. Layover would be a couple of hours. Comfort and food helpful. Would appreciate any suggestions as to which would airport/lounge would offer a better experience.

Thanks in advance.
It's about 50/50 to me. I like HKG a lot better than PEK, but the flight is longer from Canada. I would take the airport with the best connection time.
Wpgjetse is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 3:33 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: YVR
Programs: UA Premier Platinum
Posts: 3,759
HKG by a mile. Comfortable, several good Star Alliance lounges (TG, SQ, UA), organized and efficient.

PEK isn't the total gong show people make it out to be, but HKG is one of the best major airports in the world on every level.
eigenvector is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 3:38 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,918
Originally Posted by eigenvector
HKG by a mile. Comfortable, several good Star Alliance lounges (TG, SQ, UA), organized and efficient.

PEK isn't the total gong show people make it out to be, but HKG is one of the best major airports in the world on every level.
+1. PEK isn't that bad, but as mentioned, lounge-wise, HKG would be very hard to beat. You also get a lot more energy and enthusiasm at HKG.
StuckInYYZ is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 3:40 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,804
Originally Posted by Wpgjetse
I like HKG a lot better than PEK, but the flight is longer from Canada.
If in J, sometimes a longer flight is better, because allowing for a good sleep. This will be especially true if the connection is shorter.
Stranger is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 4:10 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: yyz
Programs: AC*SE 1MM. a bunch of hotel programs.
Posts: 1,592
plus .. transiting in HKG is quick and fairly painless. the transit security in PEK can be horrible at times. HKG overall is a much better airport.
karachi is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 4:14 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
HKG--always.
mapleg is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 4:14 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 733
HKG >> PEK, especially if flying CX. Also the vies into/out of HKG tend to be quite nice. Oh and PEK is run by Chinese ATC which are prone to traffic delays.
Nazdoom is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 5:11 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE*2MM. SPG Plat life
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by Stranger
If in J, sometimes a longer flight is better, because allowing for a good sleep. This will be especially true if the connection is shorter.
I would agree on the overnight return flight, but going there is another story.
Wpgjetse is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 5:29 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Definitely HKG. PEK is subject to bad delays due to ATC (weather and military exercises) so there's real risk of missed connections.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 5:47 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: AC SE MM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 904
HKG is my preferred entry into Asia for a number of reasons:

1) Don't have to deal with delays of the Chinese military arbitrarily closing down the airspace;

2) Transfer desk and security is fast and straightforward at HKG;

3) Lots of lounges to choose;

4) Despite the size, HKG is easy to walk around;

5) Departure and arrival time from YYZ is conducive to getting to the hotel at a reasonable hour, including if you have to connect in the region. Times from YVR are decent as well.

6) Language isn't as much of an issue in HKG as it is in PEK.
YVRtoYYZ is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 6:39 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,920
Hands down it is HKG. There is nothing, absolutely nothing that can be considered good about that bloated airport as a transfer point if not staying in China.

- AC pax must use the Air China lounge. Limited alcohol and mysterious food products of dubious quality are served. It makes the AC domestic MLL seem luxurious in comparison. HKG abounds with delicious food and quality.

- Dirt and filth everywhere. Touch anything and your hands and clothes become soiled. Cleanliness is the byword in Hong Kong where cleaning staff are on the job 24/7. No chance of a HKG washroom smelling like an open latrine as is the case at PEK.

- PEK has rude pax, pushing and shoving and hacking without covering their mouths. Hong Kong airport users skew to civility, much like the folks of Singapore.

- Transfer from AC to CA is an exercise in frustration. Surliness and inefficiency is the M.O. It doesn't matter if in business class, the CA agent still carries on like she's doing you a favour.

- If it's an evening flight, don't expect to hear a boarding call or announcement, because they didn't do it on any of my flights. Maybe it was an Air China thing. My colleague says he had a similar experience with China Eastern.

- Delays cancellations and misconnections are what Beijing international offers.

- If you have a long layover, PEK has the airport Hilton, which is one of the nicest Hiltons I have ever stayed in. Modern, spotless and an excellent breakfast with brilliant staff. In comparison, the Hong Kong Airport Regal seemed more like the worn out Ramada Hotel at LAX.

- If there are IROPS, no worries at all in HKG as the contract agents and airport personnel are the best of the best and are the reason why the airport is so good. At PEK, good luck.
Transpacificflyer is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 6:59 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: TK *G
Posts: 3,099
HKG all the way. I would only suggest PEK if you like to visit a more exotic place and don't mind the possible frustration from delay/rude agents, etc.
songsc is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 7:06 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto
Programs: AC SE100K, Emerald Exec, HHG
Posts: 631
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Definitely HKG. PEK is subject to bad delays due to ATC (weather and military exercises) so there's real risk of missed connections.
I agree with HKG. Easier transit and a better airport experience. The PEK air china lounge isn't that great compared to the Thai, SQ or united lounges in HK.
however, I've encountered more ATC delays out of HKG in the last few months, especially impacting polar routes, so don't assume HKG is smooth sailing; my AC16 flight a few weeks ago was 4 hrs late due to rerouting around china airspace.
sram is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2017, 8:16 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 706
HKG always

Hkg always. Last time I transited at PEK, transit desk refused to issue broading pass because my flight was 3+ hours. Later she made a hand written broading pass and let me through immigration and security. Lines for immigration was 30 minutes long and security confiscated anything that resembled battery and yogurt. CA lounge at PEK was miles behind SG or Thai lounge at HKG.

In fact I wouldn't recommend anything less than 2.5 hours connection time at PEK. HKG one hour is doable as they have agents with signs standing by for tight connection passengers
khkchan is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.