191 on Saturdays, April 2016?
May 11, 2015, 7:58 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: YYJ
Programs: AC 100KSE
Posts: 272
191 on Saturdays, April 2016?
I'm not seeing 191 on Saturday nights, or 190 on Sunday mornings, April 2016. Anyone have a sense of how solid this type of schedule change might be, this far out?
Thanks
Thanks
May 11, 2015, 9:21 am
#2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: YYJ
Programs: AC - SE100K
Posts: 727
I can't see them making 190/191 anything less than daily. It is a huge feeder flight, especially for the evening TATL flights. To make it less than daily would be a bit odd.
The departure time of 190 seems to jump around between 0600 and 0645, so perhaps they haven't put it in the system yet pending a departure time review?
I stand to be corrected.
The departure time of 190 seems to jump around between 0600 and 0645, so perhaps they haven't put it in the system yet pending a departure time review?
I stand to be corrected.
May 11, 2015, 12:34 pm
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE*2MM. SPG Plat life
Posts: 4,644
May 11, 2015, 12:50 pm
#4
Join Date: May 2014
Programs: AC Elite 50K
Posts: 367
Nothing that far out is set in stone. There are lots of reasons why this might be.
Perhaps it didn't run this year, and AC has not uploaded the new April 2016 schedule.
Perhaps there are equipment constraints on A320s for a month or two. (Heavy Maintenance, changing seating on other planes (IE 777s necessitating less transcon flights, necessitating more 320s to pick the passengers.), etc.)
Perhaps the loads/yields are bad and a YVR or YYC connection would more economically serve the passengers.
There are lots of reasons. Like all such things on here, where nobody here has the numbers speculation is the name of the game.
Perhaps it didn't run this year, and AC has not uploaded the new April 2016 schedule.
Perhaps there are equipment constraints on A320s for a month or two. (Heavy Maintenance, changing seating on other planes (IE 777s necessitating less transcon flights, necessitating more 320s to pick the passengers.), etc.)
Perhaps the loads/yields are bad and a YVR or YYC connection would more economically serve the passengers.
There are lots of reasons. Like all such things on here, where nobody here has the numbers speculation is the name of the game.