AC Pax Stuck on Tarmac for over 8 hours at YYZ
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: YKF
Programs: AC Elite 50K, Amex AP Plat, Choice Privileges, National Exec Elite, Via Prefrence
Posts: 2,996
AC Pax Stuck on Tarmac for over 8 hours at YYZ
Anyone know if this is true, I thought AC had a rule in place that they had to return to the gate after a certain amount of time.
If even half of these stories are true, all I have to say is WOW
If even half of these stories are true, all I have to say is WOW
#3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YQR
Posts: 2,743
I was on a UAX flight into YQR last year that arrived late in the evening. The bridge wouldn't work and the ground folks were saying there would be a lengthy delay. The captain, a brash Texas type guy, got out on the ramp, looked at the stairs that led up to the bridge and then told the ground agent, 'open the door up there as we're all getting off now.' I'm not sure it was strictly speaking correct to do so, but it probably saved us quite a bit of time and I sure appreciated it. I always wonder when on planes like the CRJ that have their own stairs built in why we have to wait around for the bridge to be fixed or sorted (happens fairly often in my experience) when we could just deplane and be done with it. You'd think in a situation like last night that they could have some air stairs handy to get people off the aircraft even when there wasn't a gate open. It wouldn't take long or many ground staff to make sure everyone was safe and it would save people hours in some cases.
Troubling in the news report--if everything is accurate, of course--is that pax were denied accommodations and food vouchers once the flight was finally cancelled. Is it truly weather-related when the crew times out?
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE 2MM; UA MP Premier Silver; Marriott Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite; Radisson; Avis PC
Posts: 35,255
Anyone know if this is true, I thought AC had a rule in place that they had to return to the gate after a certain amount of time.
If even half of these stories are true, all I have to say is WOW
If even half of these stories are true, all I have to say is WOW
#7
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: YKF
Programs: AC Elite 50K, Amex AP Plat, Choice Privileges, National Exec Elite, Via Prefrence
Posts: 2,996
If you cannot take off in a reasonable amount of time( i.e. less than 3 hours) than the aircraft should proceed back to a gate or offloading area.
Threatening people with a yellow card for speaking up, is not the way to go
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE 2MM; UA MP Premier Silver; Marriott Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite; Radisson; Avis PC
Posts: 35,255
Airstairs and buses seemed to work fine on an empty spot on the tarmac for how many decades, and still done in many countries.
If you cannot take off in a reasonable amount of time i.e. less than 3 hours than the aircraft should proceed back to a gate or offloading area.
Threatening people with a yellow card for speaking up is not the way to go
If you cannot take off in a reasonable amount of time i.e. less than 3 hours than the aircraft should proceed back to a gate or offloading area.
Threatening people with a yellow card for speaking up is not the way to go
#10
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Closer to YTZ
Programs: Fairmont Platinum | AC Gate Lice Status | VIPorter
Posts: 2,554
Sounds like a case of VBITs!
Disorderly and scared. I've never seen the attraction to Sun destinations. What fly all that way to hang out with a bunch of drunk Canadians in the fenced-in resort?
Getting away from it all?
Disorderly and scared. I've never seen the attraction to Sun destinations. What fly all that way to hang out with a bunch of drunk Canadians in the fenced-in resort?
Getting away from it all?
#11
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: various
Posts: 623
How do you figure? Let's find out what happened and base it on facts as opposed to your wild conjecture or opinion. I can tell you that with most of the problems I've had at airports (many not run by GTAA) the problem was most often the airlines bad planning or management of the problem. (I can give you many examples just from AC).
I can assure you that if an airline WANTED it's passengers off an aircraft it would happen touts suite (save and except maybe if there's a state of emergency). That applies especially for AC at YYZ where it has all it's resources and doesn't have to rely on contractors or anyone else for assistance. (By the way I'm talking from my long experience and inside knowledge of working in the industry)
I can assure you that if an airline WANTED it's passengers off an aircraft it would happen touts suite (save and except maybe if there's a state of emergency). That applies especially for AC at YYZ where it has all it's resources and doesn't have to rely on contractors or anyone else for assistance. (By the way I'm talking from my long experience and inside knowledge of working in the industry)
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE 2MM; UA MP Premier Silver; Marriott Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite; Radisson; Avis PC
Posts: 35,255
How do you figure? Let's find out what happened and base it on facts as opposed to your wild conjecture or opinion. I can tell you that with most of the problems I've had at airports (many not run by GTAA) the problem was most often the airlines bad planning or management of the problem. (I can give you many examples just from AC).
I can assure you that if an airline WANTED it's passengers off an aircraft it would happen touts suite (save and except maybe if there's a state of emergency). That applies especially for AC at YYZ where it has all it's resources and doesn't have to rely on contractors or anyone else for assistance. (By the way I'm talking from my long experience and inside knowledge of working in the industry)
I can assure you that if an airline WANTED it's passengers off an aircraft it would happen touts suite (save and except maybe if there's a state of emergency). That applies especially for AC at YYZ where it has all it's resources and doesn't have to rely on contractors or anyone else for assistance. (By the way I'm talking from my long experience and inside knowledge of working in the industry)
#13
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
How do you figure? Let's find out what happened and base it on facts as opposed to your wild conjecture or opinion. I can tell you that with most of the problems I've had at airports (many not run by GTAA) the problem was most often the airlines bad planning or management of the problem. (I can give you many examples just from AC).
I can assure you that if an airline WANTED it's passengers off an aircraft it would happen touts suite (save and except maybe if there's a state of emergency). That applies especially for AC at YYZ where it has all it's resources and doesn't have to rely on contractors or anyone else for assistance. (By the way I'm talking from my long experience and inside knowledge of working in the industry)
I can assure you that if an airline WANTED it's passengers off an aircraft it would happen touts suite (save and except maybe if there's a state of emergency). That applies especially for AC at YYZ where it has all it's resources and doesn't have to rely on contractors or anyone else for assistance. (By the way I'm talking from my long experience and inside knowledge of working in the industry)
Ya, GTAA is amazing. Pffft.
The de-icing nightmare is most of the problem there. I was thankful to only wait 1.5 hours in the de-ice queue last week (3rd in line when arriving at the central pad). Every story out there about long tarmac delays are all about de-icing and re-de-icing and then fuel issues due to the wait.
Then GTAA lets YYZ go gridlock and actually broadcast that status to the planet. Embarrassing as he*l if you ask me. You think AC gridlocked YYZ. Laughable.
#14
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: YVR
Programs: AC*SE MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 4,604
Canada needs a tarmac rule as they just instituted in the States. Here's another one from this winter: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-c...armac-yvr.html
You can't do much about a disruptive pax, but you can certainly handle a bad situation better:
For those who purchases on premium card cards, travel insurance would kick in at this point.
I'm sure that passengers were happy to hear that AC was voted a 4* airline as they deplaned.
You can't do much about a disruptive pax, but you can certainly handle a bad situation better:
Travellers complained that they were given no food throughout the entire eight-hour wait. Orange juice and water were eventually served at the six-hour mark. “The crew fed business class. Nothing was offered to the rest of the passengers,” Matteis said.
Customers who complained to Air Canada agents were told they would not receive any compensation such as accommodation.
Customers who complained to Air Canada agents were told they would not receive any compensation such as accommodation.
I'm sure that passengers were happy to hear that AC was voted a 4* airline as they deplaned.