Community
Wiki Posts
Search

EU 261 for missed connection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2017, 12:48 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,730
Originally Posted by DesertNomad
People ending in SFO are due 300 EUR with a three hour delay, but it was only 2:59 to the runway. The legislation is supposed to be until the door is opened which *was* over 3 hours.
The relevant delay for all flights between Europe and North America is 4 hours, not 3. DUB-SFO is 8,171 km.

Originally Posted by EC

Article 7

Right to compensation

1. Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall receive compensation amounting to:

(a) EUR 250 for all flights of 1500 kilometres or less;

(b) EUR 400 for all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres, and for all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres;

(c) EUR 600 for all flights not falling under (a) or (b).

In determining the distance, the basis shall be the last destination at which the denial of boarding or cancellation will delay the passenger's arrival after the scheduled time.

2. When passengers are offered re-routing to their final destination on an alternative flight pursuant to Article 8, the arrival time of which does not exceed the scheduled arrival time of the flight originally booked

(a) by two hours, in respect of all flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or

(b) by three hours, in respect of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and for all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or

(c) by four hours, in respect of all flights not falling under (a) or (b),

the operating air carrier may reduce the compensation provided for in paragraph 1 by 50 %.

Last edited by irishguy28; Dec 8, 2017 at 12:58 pm
irishguy28 is online now  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 1:14 pm
  #17  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Nevada
Programs: DL,EK
Posts: 1,652
Wiki says: "For type 3 flights delayed by between three and four hours, the compensation is halved to 300."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...ation_261/2004

But I don't see that in the EC261 text.

Originally Posted by Often1
Thirty days would be miraculously fast.
Aer Lingus emailed me today to say that they are sending a check for $1418 (600 EUR x 2) to my US address. Fingers crossed. That was a 6-day response time.

Last edited by DesertNomad; Dec 8, 2017 at 3:35 pm
DesertNomad is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2017, 1:31 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,730
The reduced compensation is intended for those who are rebooked/rerouted/bumped ("offered re-routing to their final destination on an alternative flight pursuant to Article 8"); I don't believe it is paid to people who travel on the flight as originally booked and which is subject to a simple delay.
irishguy28 is online now  
Old Dec 19, 2017, 9:33 am
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Nevada
Programs: DL,EK
Posts: 1,652
We received payment. It was all very easy.
Dambus, sapman986 and DELLAS like this.
DesertNomad is offline  
Old May 19, 2022, 11:38 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 23
Confirming coverage

Good afternoon,

Before I fire off a EU 261 request - please can I check my understanding of my circumstance is correct. Fact pattern:

I flew YYZ->DUB->BHX last week. The YYZ->DUB leg was ~30 mins late leaving due to "the crew bus being stuck in traffic and arriving late to the airport". As a consequence I missed my connection at DUB and was moved onto the next BHX flight by the staff at the DUB transfer desk. The flight landed in at BHX ~4:15 later than my originally ticketed time.

My understanding is given the total delay was > 4 hrs, the total distance was >3,500 km and the cause of the delay wasn't an exceptional circumstance - the amount due under EU261 would be EUR 600 - am I correct? Are there any Brexit related issues / changes to consider given my flight started and ended outside of the EU?

Many thanks
TheHoof.
TheHoof is offline  
Old May 19, 2022, 1:52 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: EIDW
Programs: Aer Lingus Concierge, Radisson Rewards Platinum, BW Diamond, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,968
Should be a valid claim.

In this case it is an EU carrier throughout, guess you were booked on the EI262 to BHX?

Operated by a EU carrier to/from EU you are covered. €600 sounds right.
ROKNA is offline  
Old May 19, 2022, 4:09 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Programs: AerClub - Concierge, Hotels.com - Gold
Posts: 934
Originally Posted by ROKNA
Should be a valid claim.

In this case it is an EU carrier throughout, guess you were booked on the EI262 to BHX?

Operated by a EU carrier to/from EU you are covered. €600 sounds right.
Sounds right. But completely ridiculous. €600 for a four hour delay caused by traffic congestion is absolutely mental, especially in post Covid times with airlines at the pin of their collar.
alserire is offline  
Old May 19, 2022, 7:41 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 23
Yes, I was originally booked on EI262.

I don't disagree that the cost to the airline in this instance is significant. However I also have little doubt that were the situation reversed and I was late arriving due to traffic, I'd be shown very little in the way of accommodations and would need to incur significant costs to get to my destination. Thems the rules & it swings both ways.
Kgmm77 and mccartje like this.
TheHoof is offline  
Old May 19, 2022, 11:53 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: EIDW
Programs: Aer Lingus Concierge, Radisson Rewards Platinum, BW Diamond, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,968
Exactly, someone in HQ will learn having the crew hotel on the wrong side of town was a bad idea.

In this case only a small number onboard would have claim as the actual delay was small but its impact on connections possibly significant, so if the 262 was missed, then the 202 to MAN, all the regional UK destinations were missed as well.

Last edited by ROKNA; May 20, 2022 at 12:14 am
ROKNA is offline  
Old May 31, 2022, 2:02 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 23
Quick update - my claim was rejected as falling under "exceptional circumstances".

I've replied challenging their position however if they continue to dig their heels in and refuse - what are the options for escalation?
TheHoof is offline  
Old May 31, 2022, 3:05 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Programs: AerClub - Concierge, Hotels.com - Gold
Posts: 934
Originally Posted by TheHoof
Quick update - my claim was rejected as falling under "exceptional circumstances".

I've replied challenging their position however if they continue to dig their heels in and refuse - what are the options for escalation?
Over a little past a four hour delay? Maybe cut them a break and stop milking it.
alserire is offline  
Old May 31, 2022, 6:36 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 23
Originally Posted by alserire
Over a little past a four hour delay? Maybe cut them a break and stop milking it.
With all due respect, why should I cut them a break? Their obligations are clearly set out in the rules they operate under, and claiming "exceptional circumstance" when I and the rest of the passengers on the flight were able to make it to airport on time is disingenuous.

A failure to plan, both on getting crew to the airport on time and offering a schedule with such a tight connection, is something the airline should accept the consequences of.

As I said in my previous post, were the situation reversed and I was late to the airport and missed the departure by 30 mins - would I be cut a break? I'd suggest not.
sapman986 and Billyfergus like this.
TheHoof is offline  
Old May 31, 2022, 10:18 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA ExPl, DL PM, UA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium, probably some others
Posts: 4,099
Originally Posted by alserire
Over a little past a four hour delay? Maybe cut them a break and stop milking it.
Do you work for EI? The rules are the rules for a reason, and EI knows the risks they take when they put their staff sufficiently far away from the airport to get stuck in traffic. Traffic is not an extraordinary circumstance, and if the OP were to get stuck in traffic and miss their flight, EI would happily take their money for a new ticket.
sapman986 and TheHoof like this.
steveholt is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2022, 3:00 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Programs: AerClub - Concierge, Hotels.com - Gold
Posts: 934
Originally Posted by steveholt
Do you work for EI? The rules are the rules for a reason, and EI knows the risks they take when they put their staff sufficiently far away from the airport to get stuck in traffic. Traffic is not an extraordinary circumstance, and if the OP were to get stuck in traffic and miss their flight, EI would happily take their money for a new ticket.
No but I know people who do. And I know the fine margins they’re operating at. EU261 is ridiculously punitive. I’ve been delayed more than four hours a couple of times and it hasn’t even occurred to me to claim a vast sum of money that I’m not even out expenses wise. Guess some people just want handy cash. Who cares if the airline survives or has to fire people.
alserire is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2022, 3:27 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: EIDW
Programs: Aer Lingus Concierge, Radisson Rewards Platinum, BW Diamond, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,968
Posters issue qualifies as legitimate claim.

The arguments around EC261 have been around for a long time, but the race to make a profit leaves EI exposed. Its not unreasonable to compensate for failure to satisfy the contract
1. Setting MCT's which are too tight (arrive off a TATL on a 300 gate and transfer to south gates...)
2. Tight turnarounds and known risk (e.g. German airports after 11pm) not managed
3. Return to base airport as destination lacks support (or EI hasn't someone under contract locally) to repair a problem but safe to fly but cannot depart again without repair
4. Operated TATL for several years with absolutely no backup/spare

Someone in head office has done the math and worked out what amount of EC261 they want to pay and that is less than the savings made by being 'optimistic'
irishguy28, SandLake and masmadrid like this.
ROKNA is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.