OK, perhaps this isn't the right thread to bring this up, but I was just editing my signature and I noticed the following error message:I am guessing that [SIZE] in the sigs was disabled as a direct result of the issue mentioned in post #2. However, I think disabling [SIZE] is not the correct action.

I agree that having a huge font in the sig is severely distracting and should be discouraged or perhaps disallowed. However, what about smaller fonts? That's what I'd like to use, but the current policy has apparently disallowed all use of the [SIZE] modifier.

Is there no way to simply limit the value of SIZE that is allowed in signatures, e.g. allowing a max size of 3 (the "regular" font size), but still allowing lower values? Many signatures are still rather intrusive and/or just visually unappealing in the regular font size, while they look perfectly good in a smaller size.

I can see the point of disallowing SIZE=5, but doing that through a blanket prohibition of the SIZE modifier is just the wrong action, IMHO. Small sizes should (perhaps must, if we are to maintain proper visual aesthetics) still be allowed.

What say you?