Let's see.. mileage runners are maybe .001% of all travelers? Sounds like a great reason for a pejorative strike. At the same time, USAir is kissing off 36.999% of its frequent travelers (non-mileage runners).
I hope USAir now goes Chapter 7 for this action. The rest of the traveling public is better off without them, even though it means decreased competition.
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by FT wannabe:
My argument is that it is more economical for the airlines to cut capacity than to keep feeding off these mileage run fancies.</font>