FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Transcon vs. Midcon - A Tale of Two Experiences
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 11:21 am
  #37  
CAL PHL FLYER
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Programs: United 1K,Marriott Platinum Premier,IHC Platinum Ambassador,Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,898
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by radonc1
It's particularly frustrating to contrast the service levels between the "true" transcons and, say, EWR-LAS, which is only about 200 miles shorter.

I think I have been saying this for quite a while. CLE to LAX is also a "transcom" in terms of milage and time (45 min less than EWR) but our level of first class service is markedly degraded from what is delivered coast to coast. What is remarkable is that I will have done 3 of these in three weeks and have gotten no upgrades on the non-stops. This can only mean that CO is selling out the front of the plane and that means that people consider the toned down service to be worth the money when compared with the competition. I just wonder when the competition will wake up and realize that there is a subgroup of passengers willing to pay for a truely premium product.
As you mentioned..They are ALLREADY paying for it..the F/C is sold out and it appears the service level is acceptable..Companies provide service/fares according to what th markets will bear..if this product is soldout on a consistant basis..I wouldnt think there needs to be any change in service..
CAL PHL FLYER is offline