Originally Posted by bocastephen

From what I've seen in the media, they are only interested in interviewing people who follow Party doctrine. Ample time is given to those who say "if it keeps us safe, I'm all for it"...very little time is given to those who say "I am not sure if I'm comfortable with them doing that..." and no time (none I've ever seen) is given to someone who might say "given the poor test scores, it appears we've wasted over 5 billion dollars without seeing any benefit and this liquid nonsense is distracting us from doing real security".

That's why people like Mike Boyd voice their opinion through web blogs and don't often get invited to comment on television (or get treated rudely when voicing contrary opinions).