Originally Posted by
tommyleo
I must disagree with you on this one, Dirkman. If we don't think it was right for UA to remove preferred seating for *A pax, then how can we condone US doing the same? ("Two wrongs don't make a right"?) US's reaction seemed very spiteful. Luckily, the rest of the *A has not yet been as spiteful, for I found out that I will still be eligible for preferred seating on an upcoming Air New Zealand flight.
We can agree to disagree on this point, tommy. The change occured in the middle of the benefit year and I haven't purchased a UA ticket since. Why should US being doing UA any favors? Makes little sense to me.