FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - FF Elite program opinions
View Single Post
Old Dec 25, 2001 | 5:36 pm
  #16  
venk
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,974
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Plato90s:
For example 1, I wonder what you are upset about. As an AA PLT, you can use the first-class check-in line, even while flying in coach. So there you were, getting preferential treatment, but you're still not happy with AA?
</font>
That one experience was before AA had comped me to Platinum level (actually they had but had not told me about it yet). I was in the coach line. Even if I was not in the coach line it is still a good example of bad relative service on part of an airline.

I was bumped even with the platinum level though! I have never been bumped by UA or CO after reaching elite status even when they have had to resort to bumping and with me arriving just 20 minutes before departure (pre 9/11).

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">
As for your second example, that hardly seems like my experience. People who get pulled for secondary screening don't get on the jetway until the plane is ready for boarding, and in general are allowed to jump to the head of the line as soon as they are cleared.
</font>
In EWR, the secondary screening is done behind the gate check-in counter and you proceed to the jetway (actually the short walkway before the extensible part of the jetway) as soon as you are done. There is nowhere else to go after the screening. Common sense would dictate that they start the secondary screening after the plane is ready for boarding. But then this was AA... :-)

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">

And if you're not happy with the extra security, I suggest you contact the FAA to let them know you are annoyed. AA is merely carrying out the appropriate security provisions.
</font>
Nowhere in my posts have I complained about extra security. As a FF, I want maximum security checks for self-preservation. Even this extra security by US carriers appears to be a joke and more for appearances ("can I touch you on your legs, sir?"). It is how the carriers handle the requirements (e.g., the discretionary profiling that carriers do over and above what FAA selection does) that differentiates them and in my experience cetainly puts AA in a bad light compared to UA or CO. AA's dumb profiling gives me no sense of security over UA or CO.

What is common in all of these bad experiences with AA is that there seemed to be very little individual initiative or common sense steps taken by the ground staff to make it just a little more bearable for the traveller especially when things go slightly awry or there are exceptions. This can be alleviated by hiring good staff but no airline has a monopoly on hiring good staff. It is the corporate culture and management practices that translate to this attention to detail. AA almost feels like a government-owned airline (shudder!)
venk is offline