to the Washington Times for this piece of drivel.

The way they slant the article--from the headline "Airline-security incidents seen as terrorist feints" completely misrepresenting the lead-in paragraph (which says the incidents have "more to do with flukes, red herrings or terrorist probes than with actual, imminent threats, intelligence observers and security officials say," NOT that all the incidents are seen as feints as the headline suggests) to the selections of quotes and people interviewed--is hardly journalism.