Originally Posted by gleff
For the record, and since there seemed to be some confusion on the matter in another thread, I simply copied and pasted the motion as it was made.
I haven't been around for a lot of what has apparently been posted in the past day or so, but I can certainly confirm that what
gleff posts above is correct.
What we voted on was precisely what the motion was.
As outlined elsewhere I suggested it was doomed to fail due to a small change in the wording, which I do believe would have made it technically impossible to implement.
But
gleff as TB President simply posts motions to a vote after they are proposed and seconded, and that is indeed what was done here.